Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Ric Flair said:

I don't get the man, I really don't. He's the most peculiar manager we've ever had. Please can this be the end.

THe only end is for you to jump off a cliff i'm afraid, the owners have made it clear, they believe in him, like a cult leader

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, The Doctor said:

Or a narrow 4-2-3-1 with in effect 3 number 10s?

It’s plausable. I think we will play Nacho and Vardy up top with Madders behind. 

 

Looking forward to the egg on my face at kick off lol  

Posted
7 minutes ago, UPinCarolina said:

As others have stated, I expect our front 4 to float all over the place.

 

Feels like we’re scoring goals today.

As long as the back 4 do not do the same like last week.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Jattdogg said:

Anyone starting to feel like puels team selection is as random as pulling out for safe sex.  Lots of hope and faith.

99% of people on this forum won't understand your point, most have never seen a pussy in flesh let alone wet there tackle in one

  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)

People moaning about the changes are probably the same people moaning about how rubbish we were against Bournemouth. Bloke can’t win it’s clear things needed to be changed so he’s done it now he’s in the wrong 

Edited by baldeagle
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

Really hope  this is one of those 5 nil thrashing games. Vardy with a hat trick, ghezzal with a sweet prince like goal and slab head with a thundercvnt

Edited by Jattdogg
Posted
1 minute ago, mozartfox said:

As long as the back 4 do not do the same like last week.

Amartey is a little more stable than Ricardo, IMO. Seems like we’ll transition to a 3 at the back going forward? Someone else mentioned this and it makes sense.

Posted (edited)

Four at the back with

 

Amartey - Evans - Maguire - Chilwell

 

Morgan out to suspension, no Pereira. Seems to me Puel has learnt his lesson from the previous game(s).

Maguire/Evans should be our preferred centre-back line-up for the near future, anyway.

 

And Iheanacho either up front alongside Vardy or as a winger. :schmike:

Edited by MC Prussian
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Dr The Singh said:

99% of people on this forum won't understand your point, most have never seen a pussy in flesh let alone wet there tackle in one

Waiting for someone to post a pic of their cat

Posted
Just now, Ric Flair said:

Very little pace in that side, it's going to be a turgid afternoon.

Vardy, Iheancho and even Ghezzal can be quick if needed.

 

Speed isn't everything.

I'd rather we create our own chances instead of relying on pace alone.

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, 80footgiraffe said:

Still no Soyuncu or Diabate. I really dont know what Puel is up to at this point.

Explain the negative please,because I am getting confused.....

many posters are quoted they are happy and satisfied.....then comes along,for no reason your comment....

Please discuss with the posters who are happy with selection and  why  you are disgusted...

 

Because it just confuses me.....

Edited by fuchsntf
Posted

A fair few changes again - not necessarily a bad thing as something had to give. Probably confirms the fact that even after all this time, Puel has no idea what his strongest team is.

Posted

Surely this is the last game you’d drop Ricardo for and start Amartey. We could have got away with Silva midfield too instead of two cloggers

Posted
1 minute ago, MC Prussian said:

Vardy, Iheancho and even Ghezzal can be quick if needed.

 

Speed isn't everything.

I'd rather we create our own chances instead of relying on pace alone.

It's all set up for 70% possession, them being camped in their half and us finding it frustratingly difficult to work any openings. It'll be passed from defender to defender, in to a midfielder, back to defender, out to a winger, jockeyed along quite slowly so the opposition can form a wall, worked inside, back outside and then eventually an aimless cross in. At least there's potentially 2 strikers rather than 1 today to try and attack any crosses, Iheanacho is a bit stronger in the air so let's hope we find a bit of space. 

 

 

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Very little pace in that side, it's going to be a turgid afternoon.

And you would change this how? Ricardo?

Edited by UPinCarolina
Posted
Just now, Mark said:

Surely this is the last game you’d drop Ricardo for and start Amartey. We could have got away with Silva midfield too instead of two cloggers

 

I'm kind of inclined to agree with this. 

 

Huddersfield are dog-shit at the moment. 

 

Far too defensive if it plays out like it looks and I'm not anti-Puel by any stretch but meh. 

 

Tired of seeing Vardy isolated up front as well.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...