Leicester fan BANNED after jumping barrier to hug son of late owner Vichai Srivaddhanaprabha

[StanSP]

18 minutes ago, sylofox said:

Rules are rules. Just as Grays yellow had to be given this guy needed a ban.

just reminded me that Bamba didn't get booked for taking his shirt off when celebrating last weekend 

[ChownLC]

Attention seeking bellend, the guy forcing a selfie with Top should've also been banned.

[Raj]

Deserves it and lucky it wasn't a longer ban. What makes him so special that he feels he can do that when most of us would probably want to give Top a hug for what he's been through. Same sort of people who messed up our trophy parade for the championship game. Some people think they are entitled to do this "cos they're hard core innit"???

Edited 17 November 2018 by Raj

[Raj]

1 hour ago, purpleronnie said:

Please tell me that's not true.

 

Someone actually tried to get a selfie?

 

If that's true my hatred of selfies intensifies.

Yes it's true unfortunately.

There are some dumb bastards in the world.

[mod hero]

Just to be clear, the lad in question who jumped over the boards (who I’ve known for a very long time) did not ask for a selfie. 

[broughtonblue]

For clarity...

 

The tw@t asking for the selfie was in the east stand about opposite the dug outs. The c0ck that ran on the pitch was from the family stand.

[nwl fox]

3 hours ago, Ashley said:

No.

 

 

Was it you Ashley ?

[Costock_Fox]

1 hour ago, broughtonblue said:

For clarity...

 

The tw@t asking for the selfie was in the east stand about opposite the dug outs. The c0ck that ran on the pitch was from the family stand.

The most compelling argument for swapping the Kop and Family stand that I’ve heard so far.

Edited 17 November 2018 by Costock_Fox

[nwl fox]

22 minutes ago, broughtonblue said:

For clarity...

 

The tw@t asking for the selfie was in the east stand about opposite the dug outs. The c0ck that ran on the pitch was from the family stand.

Ok that clarifies thanks.

One was a twat the other was a cock ?

[foxinyourbox]

Why go to the papers though?  It gives every cynical bastard opposition fan a stick to hit us with.  An annoying act of self indulgence.

[Manwell Pablo]

Saw this on Facebook and actually commented on our fan page which is extremely rare for me.

 

instead of complaining about the club issuing a ban till the Cardiff game and getting his cronies to complain on social media he should be ringing the club up and thanking them for letting him off so lightly.

 

Sure he is a nice enough lad etc but he’s made a mistake so you take your medicine. Under normal circumstances he’d get a three year ban.

 

Edited 17 November 2018 by Manwell Pablo

[Blue ROI]

Club are absolutely right to ban him. He got off very lightly. Wouldn't happen into a quieter mourning scenario so there is no excuse.

[Suzie the Fox]

Regardless of what our 'opinions' are of this guy ... 

 

At least he has found fame on this forum, and made 4 pages of discussion. Good job guys. 

 

Social Media (Facebook) at its best 

 

 

[ithuriel]

I'd be very grateful if I were him for only getting a short term ban, maybe he can appeal and get a longer one 

[DerbyshireFox]

10 minutes ago, Suzie the Fox said:

Regardless of what our 'opinions' are of this guy ... 

 

At least he has found fame on this forum, and made 4 pages of discussion. Good job guys. 

 

Social Media (Facebook) at its best 

 

 

Come on, give him more credit than that. He’s made the paper and had a petition set up in his honour, he’ll be one of the standbys for I’m a celebrity next 

[Ashley]

1 hour ago, nwl fox said:

Was it you Ashley ?

[Trav Le Bleu]

6 hours ago, Ashley said:

 

He came on from the family stand. 

Should be a new chant.

 

"He came on from the family Stand

And went and got himself banned,

But if no more he bothers Top

They're gonna let the charges drop."

[TheUltimateWinner]

3 hours ago, broughtonblue said:

For clarity...

 

The tw@t asking for the selfie was in the east stand about opposite the dug outs. The c0ck that ran on the pitch was from the family stand.

**** them both

[UpTheLeagueFox]

I remember the guy who ran on the pitch in the 0-5 thrashing by Villa.

He got a three year ban.

He would've missed seeing us at home 2004 - 2007.

That was a bloody reward, not a punishment!!

[PhillippaT]

3 hours ago, TheUltimateWinner said:

**** them both

They can have each other - apparently it would seem they're compatible..?

[Suzie the Fox]

5 hours ago, DerbyshireFox said:

Come on, give him more credit than that. He’s made the paper and had a petition set up in his honour, he’ll be one of the standbys for I’m a celebrity next 

FT > Mercury  

[tylesta]

5 hours ago, UpTheLeagueFox said:

I remember the guy who ran on the pitch in the 0-5 thrashing by Villa.

He got a three year ban.

He would've missed seeing us at home 2004 - 2007.

That was a bloody reward, not a punishment!!

He actually got banned from home ground for life.

[Manwell Pablo]

4 hours ago, tylesta said:

He actually got banned from home ground for life.

 

He was actually aggressive towards Ian Walker though wasn’t he. I can see why the club has been lenient. 

 

Although if he actually has gone to the mercury for sympathy and they run the story, if I were the club I’d be increasing the ban. 

[cambridgefox]

There are rules you have to adhere to,grieving or not, and the club have been fairly lenient due to the circumstances.

You could go on a 2 week holiday and miss 3 home league games.

[tylesta]

4 hours ago, Manwell Pablo said:

 

He was actually aggressive towards Ian Walker though wasn’t he. I can see why the club has been lenient. 

 

Although if he actually has gone to the mercury for sympathy and they run the story, if I were the club I’d be increasing the ban. 

They can only be increased if he breaches the ban i.e entering the stadium or going with 300 meters of the stadium.