Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Tuna

Southampton Home Match Thread

Recommended Posts

Guest seanfox778
Posted

3 points please Leicester! Looking forward to this.

Posted
Just now, Ian Nacho said:

Still don't like the fact were playing 3 defensive midfielders at home against a team in the bottom 3. Not much else choice though in terms of options. 

I agree but if it means that essentially the 3 up front can focus solely on stretching Southampton and getting in behind then I'm fine about it. If those 3 are free to attack and not worry about tracking back etc then that could be a very effective tactic.

 

Depends how high up the pitch the midfield 3 can win the ball tbh.

Posted

Rather have no CM on the bench at all, than a fully fit Silva.

 

100% he will never play again for us, which I think is a shame when you see him persisting with underperforming players like Iheanacho and Gray. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Ian Nacho said:

Still don't like the fact were playing 3 defensive midfielders at home against a team in the bottom 3. Not much else choice though in terms of options. 

I genuinely think he is trying to develop Wild to play a little further forward to get more involved in an attacking sense.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Ian Nacho said:

Still don't like the fact were playing 3 defensive midfielders at home against a team in the bottom 3. Not much else choice though in terms of options. 

Best Chelsea away, man city and Everton away with them 3 in the middle 

Posted
Just now, Paddy. said:

I agree but if it means that essentially the 3 up front can focus solely on stretching Southampton and getting in behind then I'm fine about it. If those 3 are free to attack and not worry about tracking back etc then that could be a very effective tactic.

 

Depends how high up the pitch the midfield 3 can win the ball tbh.

I'd have personally gone with Ghezzal over Albrighton but happy with the formation.

 

I imagine we will see Barnes and Ghezzal second half when its still 0-0

 

 

Posted
Just now, Babylon said:

Three defensive midfielders is shit but the proof is in the pudding.

It also allows our full backs to basically play as wingers.

 

Bizarre the reasons for it need spelling out.

Posted

When one of the most exciting things about being a Leicester fan is checking if Sean got it right at 2pm... lol 

Posted
1 minute ago, whoareyaaa said:

I'd have personally gone with Ghezzal over Albrighton but happy with the formation.

 

I imagine we will see Barnes and Ghezzal second half when its still 0-0

 

:nigel:

Posted

Think aside from Evans being injured and Barnes currently being an unknown commodity in the first team (for us in the prem) it seems to be Puel’s first choice starting eleven. Fingers crossed Barnes gets on and kicks on from West Brom!

Posted

Not unhappy with that starting 11, will be expecting the full backs to be bombing on and almost playing as wingers in support of the front 3 with cover provided by our midfield.

 

Wouldn't be surprised if at some stage Puel does what he did in the Man City game and Hamza moves out wide right and switch to 4231 with Maddison moving in more centrally and changes in 2nd half with Barnes/Gray coming on - ahead of Ghezzal please!

Posted
10 minutes ago, Ian Nacho said:

Still don't like the fact were playing 3 defensive midfielders at home against a team in the bottom 3. Not much else choice though in terms of options. 

 I don’t like 3 defensive mids, and he has got choices, but chooses to play it safe

Posted

Interesting formation against a team that will park the bus. Intrigued to see how this plays out. Strong looking bench too, Demari seems brighter coming into the game later and, of course, Harvey.

 

COYF

Posted
10 minutes ago, EnderbyFox said:

Shane Long starts upfront for them, 2 goals in his last 50- that's Okazaki levels of goal scoring. Bound to bag at least 1 today lol

That’s a hat-trick for him today then! 

Posted
10 minutes ago, walkerleeds said:

It also allows our full backs to basically play as wingers.

 

Bizarre the reasons for it need spelling out.

They already do play like that. All the extra dcm does is take creativity out of the middle.

Posted

Can we all agree, at least tacitly, that Puel’s team selection is difficult to criticize - and that as a result, our hive mind should remember that if things go tits up?

Posted
2 minutes ago, UPinCarolina said:

Can we all agree, at least tacitly, that Puel’s team selection is difficult to criticize - and that as a result, our hive mind should remember that if things go tits up?

Image result for well that sounds sensible gif

 

so...no :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...