Legend_in_blue Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 Said it weeks ago, there is corruption at the highest level of the game. The FA is doing everything in its power to ensure LiVARpool win the title. It's as clear as day. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
srex9 Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 Isn't the shoulder part of the arm? So it's handball? The definition isn't clear. And it looked like Jonny was perfectly level. When it's that close how can they be sure the ball left the passers foot at that exact moment... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MattP Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 3 minutes ago, TheUltimateWinner said: It’s not accurate though, you’re relying on a HUMAN to pick a frame, you’re relying on a HUMAN to draw these lines. This isn’t clear and obvious. Nailed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Costock_Fox Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 1 minute ago, spacemunky said: I'm switching over to the darts. Less pricks to be fair. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pSinatra Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 Was the game of football so fvcked that they had to introduce this VAR bollocks? I'm not arguing that it favours any particular team. It just feels like it creates more problems than it solves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxestalkisfullofidiots Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 We can all see that making a football match pure and sterile means in loses everything that is great about it, problem is VAR has become exciting from a viewers point of view because it just adds to the excitement, it makes me just want to go watch lower league football, stand on a terrace with a pint of beer in my hand. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peach0000 Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 Surely there's some kind of technology that can actually accurately determine offsides instantly like goal line technology does. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swarles Barkley Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 1 minute ago, Legend_in_blue said: Said it weeks ago, there is corruption at the highest level of the game. The FA is doing everything in its power to ensure LiVARpool win the title. It's as clear as day. literally this kind of decision has happened 4 times this weekend. Not just Liverpool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cujek Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 4 minutes ago, Collymore said: To be fair Wolves are more of a threat to our position than we are to Liverpool so don't mind Liverpool winning this one. It's all about top four now. Agreed, but anyone of the teams can fall foul of these stupid VAR desicions, well apart from Liverpool cheats Something needs to change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Vacamion Posted 29 December 2019 Popular Post Share Posted 29 December 2019 2 minutes ago, spacemunky said: I'm switching over to the darts. 1 minute ago, Costock_Fox said: Less pricks to be fair. I really take serious issue with this post. It's *fewer* pricks. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 1 minute ago, peach0000 said: Surely there's some kind of technology that can actually accurately determine offsides instantly like goal line technology does. Doubt it, the ball is one object, with an offside you're looking at heads, feet, legs, shoulders to see what is ahead or behind, and when the ball is played. Far more technical Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post The Horse's Mouth Posted 29 December 2019 Popular Post Share Posted 29 December 2019 Tell you what is 100% accurate, goal line technology which has never received this level on scrutiny 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ftfagos Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 3 minutes ago, srex9 said: Isn't the shoulder part of the arm? So it's handball? The definition isn't clear. And it looked like Jonny was perfectly level. When it's that close how can they be sure the ball left the passers foot at that exact moment... Anatomically the shoulder is part of the arm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmt Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 Just now, Corky said: Doubt it, the ball is one object, with an offside you're looking at heads, feet, legs, shoulders to see what is ahead or behind, and when the ball is played. Far more technical You could make all the players wear those suits the guy who played Gollum had to wear 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twister Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 how do we even know these lines are correct I have said from the start its open to corruption Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmt Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 For me one of the other huge issues about these offsides is nobody can explain why it is accurate or not, it’s just silence from the top with no accountability whatsoever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vacamion Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 This person has it about right: 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RowlattsFox Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 Now we have had VAR, we can't get rid of it. I haven't followed other countries use of it but haven't heard anything like the problems we've had here and haven't noticed anything in champions League either. Are they just not looking as closely? I get the "it doesn't matter if he's off by 10 yards or 1mm" argument but there got to be better version of the rules. Before VAR, noone would even question these goals apart from maybe it was close but benefit of doubt goes to attacker. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammie82uk Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 Nope not a clue 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tielemans63 Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 11 minutes ago, Vacamion said: Now over live to Scouseley Park: Fixed 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozartfox Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 11 minutes ago, Finnegan said: No offence boys but I'm getting really bored of opinions like this. This is nothing to do with technology, it's accurate. Basically every offside decision I've seen this year has been accurate. I don't gives flying shit if someone is offside by a millimetre or not, there has to be a cut off somewhere. If you're off, you're off, whether you're off by a pixel or by ten metres. It doesn't matter. There has to be a threshold somewhere. Jonny WAS off. If you insist there has to be daylight, for example, you still have to have a cut off somewhere so it ends up being daylight by a pixel or whatever. All people are getting angry about this season is, stupidly, accuracy. You're getting upset at decisions being rightly given that are close. That's retarded. Last season you had decisions going wrong when there was miles off or onside. What do you prefer!? I love a rant about VAR favouring Liverpool as much as anyone but put your bias away a second. Lallana did hit his shoulder and Jonny was marginally off. What about the handball by VVD before sending the ball forward for the goal?? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Horse's Mouth Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 Only use VAR for penalty decisions & reds if we insist on using it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bats8711 Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 I’m fine with offsides is offsides no matter by how much. The problem is when you are dealing with thin margins, there are way too many variables as far as what we are presented with on TV. Mainly: - variance in where where the lines are marked on both attacker and defender. when they showed the freeze frame of the decision on that goal the image was literally pixelated and blurry. How can lines be accurately marked? when they draw the lines on the “armpit” (shoulder) how in the world do they determine where the shoulder begins on an off angle pixelated image? - thickness of the line. Like - it’s way too thick. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Izzy Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 Just now, jammie82uk said: Nope not a clue Just remind me which part of the body they use to measure it? Is it your foot, armpit or what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Eamonn Posted 29 December 2019 Share Posted 29 December 2019 13 hours ago, pmcla26 said: Wouldn’t mind that, each team has a couple of players at least that would be worth having a look at in the summer: Grealish Mings (meh could do worse for centre back cover I guess) Jamal Lewis if Fuchs departs as an understudy for Chilwell Cantwell + Buendia possibly but not sure Ake Callum Wilson Some decent players there, Grealish the standout one and Ake and Wilson good too. Pukki would make the list but with Kel at the minute playing the way he is I don’t think he’s necessary. Agree with all of that. Would add Pukki too. I read somewhere that Chelsea had a buy-back for Ake and were going to activate it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts