Gary Eatfood Posted 1 February 2020 Posted 1 February 2020 2 minutes ago, UniFox21 said: But if its a penalty then the rest is irrelevant. It is, but it just doesn't sit well with me that a goal can be scored after the incident, to dismiss all of that, and then wait three minutes for a penalty to be awarded. Perhaps a review system like cricket or tennis would work better? Maybe then play could be halted as soon as a manager wants to review a decision? Just a thought.
davieG Posted 1 February 2020 Author Posted 1 February 2020 55 minutes ago, davieG said: Match of the Day running order Liverpool vs Southampton Watford vs Everton West Ham vs Brighton Bournemouth vs Aston Villa Leicester vs Chelsea Crystal Palace vs Sheffield United Newcastle vs Norwich Update from the merc MOTD running order: Liverpool vs Southampton, Watford vs Everton, West Ham United vs Brighton, Bournemouth vs Aston Villa, Leicester vs Chelsea, Crystal Palace vs Sheffield United, Manchester United vs Wolves, Newcastle vs Norwich City.
Super_horns Posted 1 February 2020 Posted 1 February 2020 11 minutes ago, steveherbe said: And the Watford game gets the screeching woman as commentator We seem to have her a lot - got called sexist by someone on another forum for calling her loud ! 7 minutes ago, jammie82uk said: Never a second yellow based on that for delph Probably why they looked so pumped up to keep us out although wasn't hard. Nigel wasn't great with his subs although not his fault Issac Success really doesn't live up to his name and it seems Chalobah was injured again. And really all 3 Everton goals were avoidable.
MrsJohnMurphy Posted 1 February 2020 Posted 1 February 2020 23 minutes ago, steveherbe said: And the Watford game gets the screeching woman as commentator you mean the 12 year old boy?
surrifox Posted 1 February 2020 Posted 1 February 2020 Grealish just runs in to Lerma and throws himself over
baldeagle Posted 1 February 2020 Posted 1 February 2020 Match of the day being predictable as always all about Chelsea and Tammy then about 1 second at the end saying we’re doing alright
Sunbury Fox Posted 1 February 2020 Posted 1 February 2020 Right, so we have twice as many shots on goal as Chelsea and all of the analysis is about hypothetical sh1t that Abraham might have done if he wasn't sh1t..
Trav Le Bleu Posted 2 February 2020 Posted 2 February 2020 1 hour ago, UniFox21 said: Admittedly Liverpool could've had a penalty earlier in the game, so both hard done in that aspect. But, once again a key decision goes for Liverpool. Yeah I thought that was too. Two seemingly clear penalties. One for each side, so cancels out, but that's not the point. As far as I'm concerned, over half the time VAR is missing stuff or giving off sides by 1 or 2 mm, whilst otherwise interrupting the flow. Hate it!
Trav Le Bleu Posted 2 February 2020 Posted 2 February 2020 1 hour ago, jammie82uk said: Never a second yellow based on that for delph Again with VAR, did they review that? They should, because the player doesn't get the chance to appeal it. I'm waiting for someone to get sent off, VAR agreeing with ref and then it getting overturned on appeal weeks later.
jammie82uk Posted 2 February 2020 Posted 2 February 2020 24 minutes ago, Trav Le Bleu said: Again with VAR, did they review that? They should, because the player doesn't get the chance to appeal it. I'm waiting for someone to get sent off, VAR agreeing with ref and then it getting overturned on appeal weeks later. Var can’t review yellow cards
surrifox Posted 2 February 2020 Posted 2 February 2020 1 hour ago, Sunbury Fox said: Right, so we have twice as many shots on goal as Chelsea and all of the analysis is about hypothetical sh1t that Abraham might have done if he wasn't sh1t.. Exactly . I couldn’t believe what a crock that analysis was - making the case for Abraham being a shoo in for England by showing a series of shots of him making poor decisions and reacting too slowly
Super_horns Posted 2 February 2020 Posted 2 February 2020 They seemed to rush through it all - at the end Wrighty was cut off talking about Norwich for example.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 2 February 2020 Posted 2 February 2020 9 hours ago, jammie82uk said: Var can’t review yellow cards Which is stupid, because sometimes they have far more far reach in effects than a single goal.
Corky Posted 2 February 2020 Posted 2 February 2020 8 hours ago, Super_horns said: They seemed to rush through it all - at the end Wrighty was cut off talking about Norwich for example. Well, why review actual chances when we can look at Tammy Abraham falling over and not moving?
yorkie1999 Posted 2 February 2020 Posted 2 February 2020 10 hours ago, surrifox said: Grealish just runs in to Lerma and throws himself over The kicking a ball past a player then running into him and going over like you've been shot tactic is wearing a bit thin now and i'm suprised the refs arn't cottoning on to it, maybe something to do the fact championship players, which no doubt Grealish will be if Villa go down, don't get into the England squad.
Unabomber Posted 2 February 2020 Posted 2 February 2020 What happened to Rudiger when he scored his first? He had a little fit looked quite concerning.
surrifox Posted 2 February 2020 Posted 2 February 2020 19 minutes ago, Unabomber said: What happened to Rudiger when he scored his first? He had a little fit looked quite concerning. Probably struggling to remember the exact choreography for his goal celebration given that it’s hardly ever required
Hammo Posted 2 February 2020 Posted 2 February 2020 34 minutes ago, Corky said: Well, why review actual chances when we can look at Tammy Abraham falling over and not moving? Those of us who attended yesterday were able to make our own analysis of Abraham. He’s rubbish. And a cheat.
CUJimmy Posted 2 February 2020 Posted 2 February 2020 11 hours ago, Trav Le Bleu said: Again with VAR, did they review that? They should, because the player doesn't get the chance to appeal it. I'm waiting for someone to get sent off, VAR agreeing with ref and then it getting overturned on appeal weeks later. Happened already with Son on Gomez.
Guest Cujek Posted 3 February 2020 Posted 3 February 2020 On 01/02/2020 at 23:09, MrsJohnMurphy said: you mean the 12 year old boy? She was Co commentating on spurs man City on 5 live. I had never heard her before and it sounded like they had a competition winner come and help commentate and that winner was a 12 year old boy. She kept using some of the worst clichés in football, "man City try to walk the ball in to the goal" etc. It was only when half time came and the studio people thanked the commentary team, I realised it was a woman. I genuinely don't think I was being sexist, I just think she is shit.
Phube Posted 15 February 2020 Posted 15 February 2020 Nice criticising of a correct decision, but the obvious shoulder barge foul/obstruction on Madders not even shown, let alone discussed!
Trav Le Bleu Posted 15 February 2020 Posted 15 February 2020 Danny Murphy being a bell-end again, saying that it would be a bad thing if Man City are disqualified from CL as it would set a precedent for other big clubs. We WANT it to set a precedent for other big clubs, you tool!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.