Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
davieG

Match of the Day 2019/2020

By davieG, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Phube said:

Nice criticising of a correct decision, but the obvious shoulder barge foul/obstruction on Madders not even shown, let alone discussed! :(

Did you think it was a pen ?  just a strong defender protecting his goal ....... would be devastated and spitting feathers if that was given against us .....even more so than the dangly offside foot !

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Phube

Phube

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, st albans fox said:

Did you think it was a pen ?  just a strong defender protecting his goal ....... would be devastated and spitting feathers if that was given against us .....even more so than the dangly offside foot !

No, I personally thought it was obstruction therefore an indirect free kick (never given these days) the Wolves player made no attempt to play the ball, literally just body checked Madders.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UniFox21

UniFox21

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Phube said:

No, I personally thought it was obstruction therefore an indirect free kick (never given these days) the Wolves player made no attempt to play the ball, literally just body checked Madders.

One of those under the category of "I've seen them given". Dean set a precedent of calling fouls for any slight contact so wouldn't have been shocked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jaspa

Jaspa

Posted
Posted

Only mention of Choudhury's first yellow was "he shouldn't have gone in that firmly", despite the fact it was a clean tackle which endangered no-one and won the ball. Completely brushed over of it with the only apparent talking point of the game an offside, which eventually got called offside despite not being called offside for a minute.

 

Also, why were all three presenters wearing the same trainers? I thought BBC weren't into advertising :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Red Squirrel

Red Squirrel

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, Jaspa said:

Only mention of Choudhury's first yellow was "he shouldn't have gone in that firmly", despite the fact it was a clean tackle which endangered no-one and won the ball. Completely brushed over of it with the only apparent talking point of the game an offside, which eventually got called offside despite not being called offside for a minute.

 

Also, why were all three presenters wearing the same trainers? I thought BBC weren't into advertising :rolleyes:

I thought those trainers looked so ridiculous I had to take a picture off the telly as they looked so sh*t

Trainers.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites
deep blue

deep blue

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, st albans fox said:

Did you think it was a pen ?  just a strong defender protecting his goal ....... would be devastated and spitting feathers if that was given against us .....even more so than the dangly offside foot !

Nonsense. The defender clearly moved across and took out  (elbowed) Madders but, annoyingly, the commentator said the defender just stood his ground. How can they not see what is in clear in front of them on the slow mo?

 

Not obstruction, which would have been an indirect free kick, but a penalty foul because of the movement across and the elbow.

 

It was a 100% penalty.  And not just seen through blue specs. My mate, an Arsenal fan and a dispassionate interpreter of the game, confirmed it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, deep blue said:

Nonsense. The defender clearly moved across and took out  (elbowed) Madders but, annoyingly, the commentator said the defender just stood his ground. How can they not see what is in clear in front of them on the slow mo?

 

Not obstruction, which would have been an indirect free kick, but a penalty foul because of the movement across and the elbow.

 

It was a 100% penalty.  And not just seen through blue specs. My mate, an Arsenal fan and a dispassionate interpreter of the game, confirmed it.

Sorry mate - I spend a lot of time with arsenal fans and I wouldn’t take anything any of them say about the game being worth listening to ......

 

we have a different view of the incident - fair enough - not nonsense though ..... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Red Squirrel

Red Squirrel

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, ozleicester said:

there must be a you porn channel for this

 

23 hours ago, Red Squirrel said:

I thought those trainers looked so ridiculous I had to take a picture off the telly as they looked so sh*t

Trainers.JPG

Want to fit in? Get the same trainers. BBC MOTD must have a job lot or its product placement. I'll stick to Samba's

Trainer 2.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davieG

davieG

Posted
  • Author
Posted

1. Chelsea v Spurs
 
2. Leicester v Man City
 
3. Burnley v Bournemouth
 
4. Southampton v Aston Villa
 
5. Crystal Palace v Newcastle
 
6. Sheffield United v Brighton

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...