st albans fox Posted 15 February 2020 Posted 15 February 2020 3 minutes ago, Phube said: Nice criticising of a correct decision, but the obvious shoulder barge foul/obstruction on Madders not even shown, let alone discussed! Did you think it was a pen ? just a strong defender protecting his goal ....... would be devastated and spitting feathers if that was given against us .....even more so than the dangly offside foot !
Phube Posted 15 February 2020 Posted 15 February 2020 1 minute ago, st albans fox said: Did you think it was a pen ? just a strong defender protecting his goal ....... would be devastated and spitting feathers if that was given against us .....even more so than the dangly offside foot ! No, I personally thought it was obstruction therefore an indirect free kick (never given these days) the Wolves player made no attempt to play the ball, literally just body checked Madders.
UniFox21 Posted 15 February 2020 Posted 15 February 2020 8 minutes ago, Phube said: No, I personally thought it was obstruction therefore an indirect free kick (never given these days) the Wolves player made no attempt to play the ball, literally just body checked Madders. One of those under the category of "I've seen them given". Dean set a precedent of calling fouls for any slight contact so wouldn't have been shocked.
Jaspa Posted 15 February 2020 Posted 15 February 2020 Only mention of Choudhury's first yellow was "he shouldn't have gone in that firmly", despite the fact it was a clean tackle which endangered no-one and won the ball. Completely brushed over of it with the only apparent talking point of the game an offside, which eventually got called offside despite not being called offside for a minute. Also, why were all three presenters wearing the same trainers? I thought BBC weren't into advertising
Red Squirrel Posted 16 February 2020 Posted 16 February 2020 26 minutes ago, Jaspa said: Only mention of Choudhury's first yellow was "he shouldn't have gone in that firmly", despite the fact it was a clean tackle which endangered no-one and won the ball. Completely brushed over of it with the only apparent talking point of the game an offside, which eventually got called offside despite not being called offside for a minute. Also, why were all three presenters wearing the same trainers? I thought BBC weren't into advertising I thought those trainers looked so ridiculous I had to take a picture off the telly as they looked so sh*t
ozleicester Posted 16 February 2020 Posted 16 February 2020 8 hours ago, Red Squirrel said: I thought those trainers looked so ridiculous I had to take a picture off the telly as they looked so sh*t there must be a you porn channel for this
deep blue Posted 16 February 2020 Posted 16 February 2020 10 hours ago, st albans fox said: Did you think it was a pen ? just a strong defender protecting his goal ....... would be devastated and spitting feathers if that was given against us .....even more so than the dangly offside foot ! Nonsense. The defender clearly moved across and took out (elbowed) Madders but, annoyingly, the commentator said the defender just stood his ground. How can they not see what is in clear in front of them on the slow mo? Not obstruction, which would have been an indirect free kick, but a penalty foul because of the movement across and the elbow. It was a 100% penalty. And not just seen through blue specs. My mate, an Arsenal fan and a dispassionate interpreter of the game, confirmed it.
st albans fox Posted 16 February 2020 Posted 16 February 2020 2 minutes ago, deep blue said: Nonsense. The defender clearly moved across and took out (elbowed) Madders but, annoyingly, the commentator said the defender just stood his ground. How can they not see what is in clear in front of them on the slow mo? Not obstruction, which would have been an indirect free kick, but a penalty foul because of the movement across and the elbow. It was a 100% penalty. And not just seen through blue specs. My mate, an Arsenal fan and a dispassionate interpreter of the game, confirmed it. Sorry mate - I spend a lot of time with arsenal fans and I wouldn’t take anything any of them say about the game being worth listening to ...... we have a different view of the incident - fair enough - not nonsense though .....
Red Squirrel Posted 16 February 2020 Posted 16 February 2020 14 hours ago, ozleicester said: there must be a you porn channel for this 23 hours ago, Red Squirrel said: I thought those trainers looked so ridiculous I had to take a picture off the telly as they looked so sh*t Want to fit in? Get the same trainers. BBC MOTD must have a job lot or its product placement. I'll stick to Samba's
davieG Posted 22 February 2020 Author Posted 22 February 2020 1. Chelsea v Spurs 2. Leicester v Man City 3. Burnley v Bournemouth 4. Southampton v Aston Villa 5. Crystal Palace v Newcastle 6. Sheffield United v Brighton
Free Falling Foxes Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 Matter of time before the programme is renamed Var of the Day
Fox_in_a_Box Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 Will just rage if I watch it. We've been ****ed over again by incompetent willy pullers stealing a living. Shambolic officiating.
SouthStandUpperTier Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 90 minutes worth of analysis on incompetent officials. Think I'll give this one a miss.
TheUltimateWinner Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 Can’t watch it tonight. I’ll be fuming all night, only just started to calm down after a few pints
BirminghamFox Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 I’m still fuming and I’m on a bus replacement device back to Brum 😖
HybridFox Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 Our game will probably be brushed under the carpet. Emphasis will be on VAR controversy for Chelsea-Spurs Didn't even cover Ederson clattering Barnes in the reverse game!
Poznan34 Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 Lineker just referred to Man City as 'City' - blasphemy!
Collymore Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 12 minutes ago, Poznan34 said: Lineker just referred to Man City as 'City' - blasphemy! They are. Anyone who calls us "City" are weird.
foxfanazer Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 2 minutes ago, Collymore said: They are. Anyone who calls us "City" are weird. Yeah well weird that
Collymore Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 Just now, foxfanazer said: Yeah well weird that I know.
UniFox21 Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 That was Billings' shoulder? Alli had one allowed for the same thing earlier this year
steveherbe Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 Did MotD just say you are allowed to raise your hands to protect your face?'Since fookin when? I played for 20+ years and never knew that. Must be a new rule introduced to benefit the rich clubs.
foxfanazer Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 Tough one between us and Bournemouth who got screwed more by VAR today
jammie82uk Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 Hasn’t Dele had a couple of goals this season allowed for hitting lower on his arm then what these two incidents in the Burnley game
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.