desertfox2 Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Take our best player off and bring on our worst defending a lead with a few minutes to go, great idea. 2
lgfualol Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Fvcking donkey brained muppet. Easily winning and he brings on the worst player we have. 3
North Leeds Fox Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Trying to do the same thing and expecting different results. Nothing will change until he goes 1
NewburyFox Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 We were doing fine until that sub and he went and conceded ALL the initiative. Absolutely embarrassing. Bin him off.
phoneticerror Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 2 minutes ago, FosseSpark said: Sack Rodgers and we will finish top 6 or 7. No way fresh eyes will make the same stupid, quasi clever tactical decisions that continually undermine us. Bullsh*t. We’ll be lucky to end top 10, even if we sack him now.
Matt_Lcfc Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 What was thinking behind bringing Vestegaard on? I’m convinced that he only made that change for the sake of making three substitutions.
LCFCCHRIS Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 (edited) Has he got Stockholm syndrome from the past few late capitulations??? The only possible reason to bring on vestegaard is a) if you want to give him confidence, that backfired! Or b) you want to concede a goal. Edited 13 February 2022 by LCFCCHRIS
Dames Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 1 minute ago, Kopfkino said: The sub made **** all difference ffs. I wouldn’t have made it but it hasn’t cost us. Pure confirmation bias where no matter what happens now, there’ll be something to find to beat Brendan with no matter the merits Vestergaard if he was able to jump should have been able to get too and clear the ball. Also the set up for defending the corner would have completely changed to accommodate him. Its weak to hold it against Rodgers in isolation but there is a bank of these decisions that is building and building up. 1
phoneticerror Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Just now, lgfualol said: Fvcking donkey brained muppet. Easily winning and he brings on the worst player we have. This is going too well. We need a challenge… Vesty, you’re up!
AjcW Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 That’ll be the 274737771 time he’s brought on lurch and we’ve immediately conceded… We were coping fine (again) but obviously a back 5 was needed. Invite pressure. Concede. Done.
StanSP Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Did he really bring on Vestergaard to protect a 1 goal lead How many times has that been successful? Not watched the game but were West Ham even looking like scoring before the lazy giant was brought on?!
Stinkenzo Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 I'm not passionately Rodgers out but I'm past caring if he was to go
Cadno'r Cymoedd Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Just now, urban.spaceman said: Still Rodgers in and I’m not sorry. Would you have made that sub?
Gazza M Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Achieved to injure JJ. Guy should not have started. Then displayed his stupidity with a sub that upset the set up at the back and then conceded from a corner late.
lee7 Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Still think Rodgers needs to go despite the second half performance. 1
ChrisFilter Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 1 minute ago, urban.spaceman said: Still Rodgers in and I’m not sorry. Me too. He clearly hasn't lost them. 2
dmayne7 Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 3 minutes ago, lcfceaves said: It was, it wasn’t handball it closer to his shoulder Almost off his elbow. Half on the sleeve. Might be different if he headed it onto that part of his arm or hadn't directly led to the goal but to out it straight in with his arm is wrong and shouldn't count
Ross 'LCFC' Turner Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 I really am sick of him, the idiot just never learns
Popular Post don_danbury Posted 13 February 2022 Popular Post Posted 13 February 2022 1 minute ago, urban.spaceman said: Still Rodgers in and I’m not sorry. freak 1 4
Shane Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Just classic Brendan isn't it, always got to overthink it. Literally no reason to bring on Vestergaard. Hopefully he's gone soon 2
darko2k7 Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 The sub literally made no difference to the result stop finding any excuse to hammer him every time something goes wrong . He makes a goal line clearing header you then say Rodgers is a genius
beepee1984 Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 6 minutes ago, Kopfkino said: The sub made **** all difference ffs. I wouldn’t have made it but it hasn’t cost us. Pure confirmation bias where no matter what happens now, there’ll be something to find to beat Brendan with no matter the merits Maddison and Tielemans off??? And a CB on! It's like he wanted to defend - which would only be a good tactic if we could actually defend!
BigGibbo Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 The player's turned a corner tonight. Rodger's couldn't unfortunately though.
Popular Post Milo Posted 13 February 2022 Popular Post Posted 13 February 2022 He really can’t help himself, can he. Man of the match/most creative player off, worst defender on. What could possibly go wrong? 5
Recommended Posts