Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Facecloth said:

 

 

Really?!

 

I thought he was nailed on to go to Spurs.


Am I right in thinking he started out at Barca?

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Super_horns said:

Why is there this hate for the bloke ?

 

Hasn’t spoken positively about Liverpool in the past has he?

He hates the ‘z cars’ theme apparently. Would demand they play Coronation Street instead.

  • Like 2
Posted
19 minutes ago, StanSP said:

Really?!

 

I thought he was nailed on to go to Spurs.


Am I right in thinking he started out at Barca?

Spurs pissed about trying to low ball us (as Levy always does) and they missed out. We told them the price ages ago, they're own fault. 

 

Yes Traore started out at Barca's academy. It's a good deal given that he rarely starts for us. I'm surprised Barca wanted him back but they've probably agreed to do a permanent swap deal for Trincao in the summer as their optional fees are both similar amounts. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, StanSP said:

Really?!

 

I thought he was nailed on to go to Spurs.


Am I right in thinking he started out at Barca?

Apparently he wasn't convinced by Spurs and wanted to look elsewhere.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Big Dave said:

Apparently he wasn't convinced by Spurs and wanted to look elsewhere.

Supposedly he didn't want to play RWB where Conte wanted him for. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Stevosevic said:

Don't think we can take the piss out of Spurs for a good few years after the other week.... 

You’re right, but it’s going to be difficult.

Edited by Spiritwalker
Posted
1 hour ago, Stevosevic said:

Don't think we can take the piss out of Spurs for a good few years after the other week.... 

I bet we can and we will.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Posted
11 hours ago, Asha said:

How much rest does a back-up goalkeeper need? lol

 

10 hours ago, davieG said:

 

Surely he needs games not only for fitness but to maintain his value.

Just my playful way of backing the Scots for the play offs tbh. Can't imagine Danny Ward needs a rest lol

  • Like 1
Posted

Harry Kewell not on the list? I know he had some injuries that held him back, but at Leeds he was an unbelievable player, I would say the best Aussie to play in the PL.

On that list 
Park

Son

Viduka

  • Like 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, Aus Fox said:

Harry Kewell not on the list? I know he had some injuries that held him back, but at Leeds he was an unbelievable player, I would say the best Aussie to play in the PL.

On that list 
Park

Son

Viduka

Good shout. Probably considered home grown as he came through their youth system. 
 

Yorke

Son

Viduka

Posted

I assume this has already been discussed but I just saw the Liverpool palace highlights on MOTD. Why did Craig Pawson on VAR overrule that clear non pen decision on Jota? How can that be deemed a clear and obvious error when it wasn’t a pen? Also he was the same person on VAR that didn’t give the pen against Ederson when he wiped out Fraser for Newcastle. That’s the 2 most dodgy decisions all season from the same guy on VAR. Does anyone genuinely think it isn’t corrupt? 

  • Like 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Unabomber said:

I assume this has already been discussed but I just saw the Liverpool palace highlights on MOTD. Why did Craig Pawson on VAR overrule that clear non pen decision on Jota? How can that be deemed a clear and obvious error when it wasn’t a pen? Also he was the same person on VAR that didn’t give the pen against Ederson when he wiped out Fraser for Newcastle. That’s the 2 most dodgy decisions all season from the same guy on VAR. Does anyone genuinely think it isn’t corrupt? 

Blind people maybe? 

Posted

It’s bull crap from multiple points of view. 
Firstly, it’s not a clear and obvious error, the original decision was no penalty, why is the VAR getting involved?

Then when the referee goes to the screen, why can’t he say nah mate, I’m sticking with my original decision?

Can anyone think of a time when a referee has gone over to the screen and not then overturned the original decision?

If refs aren’t allowed to, what’s the point in having it?

The fact that two professionals have viewed that and said it’s 1) a penalty and 2) a clear and obvious error is baffling at best and questions really need to be answered, because these decisions always appear to favour the bigger teamS.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Aus Fox said:

It’s bull crap from multiple points of view. 
Firstly, it’s not a clear and obvious error, the original decision was no penalty, why is the VAR getting involved?

Then when the referee goes to the screen, why can’t he say nah mate, I’m sticking with my original decision?

Can anyone think of a time when a referee has gone over to the screen and not then overturned the original decision?

If refs aren’t allowed to, what’s the point in having it?

The fact that two professionals have viewed that and said it’s 1) a penalty and 2) a clear and obvious error is baffling at best and questions really need to be answered, because these decisions always appear to favour the bigger teamS.

I think the PL are going to be in trouble with IFAB again over VAR. the protocols say that the on field ref has precedent over the VAR but it seems that PGMOL are instructing the on field ref not to over rule the VAR 

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...