Viva Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 10 minutes ago, Steve Earle said: Why on Earth not? He’s a proven PL goalscorer. We got £40-50m for Maddison in the same circumstances. Oh come on, you can’t compare him to Maddison!
ian__marshall Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 Might as well keep him for £8m. Would score for fun in this league. He must have parked in Rudkin's reserved parking space on his first trip to the ground with the way we've treated him since he signed. Feel for the lad he's been absolutely top class, deserves far better than Forest.
Viva Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 I don’t want to be keeping anyone that doesn’t want to be here. If he wants to go, then let him go. 3
ARTY_FOX Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 8 mil is so beyond ridiculous that anyone who sanctions it needs sacking immediately. The fact its to forest should see them jailed for hate crimes. 4
Diffco Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 Just now, Viva said: Oh come on, you can’t compare him to Maddison! You technically can, his goal/assist ratio to games played was unreal the last 3 years
Viva Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 Just now, Diffco said: You technically can, his goal/assist ratio to games played was unreal the last 3 years You really can’t! He’s not worth anything close to what Maddison went for.
TrickyTrevLeftPeg Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 With year left on his contract. 15mill tops. 8mill is outrageously low though. 2
Lambert09 Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 Some prem teams try to charge near 8m for a years loan… no chance we let him go for that youd think 15m would be a minimum
st albans fox Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 has to play in a front two and I don’t see maresca doing that. Seen him bullied by big defenders for years so the championship would be a challenge but there’s a reason why he’s a big scorer in the fa cup over the years Does he count as a home grown as he came through Man City’s academy ?? surprised it’s as low as £8m - thought we may get 12m but with a year left and big wages we’re suffering the relegation tax discount on our sales he’s 27 so buying club unlikely to make much on resale need to get past the forest angle - we can’t hang onto players in their final year where we get a reasonable offer. 1
ithuriel Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 All depends if the new manager wants to keep him and he wants to stay, not a bad striker on his day but often has a touch like a baby elephant and if his confidence goes he can be worse than a drunk Slimani. 1
mozartfox Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 14 minutes ago, ARTY_FOX said: 8 mil is so beyond ridiculous that anyone who sanctions it needs sacking immediately. The fact its to forest should see them jailed for hate crimes. Agree. This could be the cock-up that finally rids this Club of Teflon Jon.
moore_94 Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 Piroe tends to occupy the same kind of areas that Iheanacho would, and if we do sign Piroe then I doubt either would be happy about being sat on the bench For all we know Maresca might not want to keep him or Nacho might not want to stay With just 1 year left on his contract we unfortunately have very little negotiating room, if the only other club interested in him are Roma who we know would probably have offered us about £2m for him... I was hoping for £10-15m if we were going to lose him though
STUHILL Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 £15million is the minimum we should get, and that is only if Enzo doesn't want him and/or he wants to leave. Otherwise, he should be staying and starting every week! 2 1
Nolucklcfc Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 Absolutely no chance 8 million is true, not a chance. The director of football wouldn’t let it happ … oh balls
STUHILL Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 2 minutes ago, jonny_wright said: Big wage with a year left - gotta sell really a 35-50% reduced wage for 12 months for a proven goal scorer. I wouldn't sell.
Dahnsouff Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 (edited) Thing is, we don’t know what agreements are made with individual players should we be relegated but f*** me, surely that cannot in any way be true Edited 1 July 2023 by Dahnsouff
Diffco Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 23 minutes ago, Viva said: You really can’t! He’s not worth anything close to what Maddison went for. You definitely can, nacho per 90 is comparable in assists and much better in goals
Steve Earle Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 29 minutes ago, Viva said: Oh come on, you can’t compare him to Maddison! 🤔 Can’t compare best and second best player challenge? I think you can! I’m not arguing that we’d get £50m for Kels, but equally I can’t think why we’d think of selling for less than £20m. 1
Dahnsouff Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 Just now, Diffco said: You definitely can, nacho per 90 is comparable in assists and much better in goals And you expect people to say, ‘well he would be ace if he played’ Come on, specs off, the fact Rodgers never picked him badly impacts his cost unfortunately
whoareyaaa Posted 1 July 2023 Posted 1 July 2023 We should be looking to get at least 15/16m, would like him to stay depends if he wants to and the manager wants him I guess
Recommended Posts