Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Bilo said:

Call me dense, but is there any particular reason why King Power couldn't use Leuven to nominally buy a player or two and then 'loan' them to us in exchange for one of our youth or fringe players?

Spent a few minutes trying to work out the relevance of being called Denise.

  • Haha 4
Posted
18 minutes ago, VLC86 said:

Spent a few minutes trying to work out the relevance of being called Denise.

Only at weekends.

  • Haha 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, MPH said:


 

I think the concept of a contract is lost on some people  . Would fans prefer a Fofana situation where a. Player shows public disloyalty and wants to break their contract? Instead, a players shows the loyalty, behaves professionally  throughout and still gets vilified. It’s baffling.

When a player badly underperforms in the last year or two of his contract, they are obviously going to have questions about their commitment. 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, UniFox21 said:

Saw a few pundits commenting they were happy no clubs were relegated due to point deductions, bullshit.

I think the PL probably was happy.

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, ealingfox said:

 

Not sure when this rule changed if it did but I'm sure it used to be distributed between EFL clubs rather than PL clubs. Disgraceful if they've changed that rule to suit themselves.

Surprised?

  • Sad 1
Posted

“First, it’s worth recalling the PL originally said the starting point for the Club should have been -8 points. The Club got this down 2 by co-operation & another 2 at the hearing to 4 - it could have been much worse had the Club not done as is it did in the case.  

Second, and most importantly, despite being an indirect beneficiary of the contrary, I always believe it’s far better for relegation & promotion to be determined by performances on the pitch and not legal hearings behind closed doors.  Well done Nottingham Forest for doing so  today“

 

They can’t claim that we’ve not co-operated - we’ve cooperated so enthusiastically that we’ve pointed out where they’ve got their own rules wrong. 

Posted

Shocking 🤣  However, it might be beneficial for us as it opens the door to various avenues of addressing unfair treatment and potential counter-suing maybe?!

 

 

Posted
On 19/05/2024 at 10:21, Bilo said:

Call me dense, but is there any particular reason why King Power couldn't use Leuven to nominally buy a player or two and then 'loan' them to us in exchange for one of our youth or fringe players?

Ffp or whatever it is in Belgium. Record purchase about 3.5m. So they could not spend the sort of cash we need without breaking the rules.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 19/05/2024 at 14:00, VLC86 said:

Spent a few minutes trying to work out the relevance of being called Denise.

Sorry to be a bit rude but you might be a bit Denise. ;)

Posted
1 hour ago, Frank Large's Black Book said:


So now that awfully corrupt sorry nice team Chelsea have been green lighted by the PFL to sell their assets (ie training ground) to a sister company and thus avoiding a points deduction, why can't KP do the same.  Apologies if covered elsewhere

The EFL don't allow it so pointless us doing it in the accounting period we were a Championship club.

  • Like 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

The EFL don't allow it so pointless us doing it in the accounting period we were a Championship club.

Prem team from 6th June, rush that shit through :thumbup:lol

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 21/05/2024 at 06:57, les-tah said:

Shocking 🤣  However, it might be beneficial for us as it opens the door to various avenues of addressing unfair treatment and potential counter-suing maybe?!

 

 

100% load of bollox if the UK government forces this to go away. Essentially, all psr and ffp decisions should be thrown out. Everton and forest should get points back etc.

Posted
10 minutes ago, UniFox21 said:

Unsure on the source, but basically as expected. I doubt the punishment is about 8 personally 

 


It’s Percy’s article.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Couple of questions;

1) When will we actually know??  It would be very beneficial to be as soon as......So the club can do something they are really bad at "planning"

2) Are we that much worse than Forest & Everton? ON the PSR front......

3) Presume we haven't got 115 cases to answer??  So Man City heading down to the National League then?

Edited by The boy Linacre
Posted
On 19/05/2024 at 14:39, UniFox21 said:

Saw a few pundits commenting they were happy no clubs were relegated due to point deductions, bullshit.

They’re so thick and in the pocket of the PL. It’s literally their job to publicise the PL. No critical thinking allowed, and heaven forbid if Everton’s deduction was applied when it should have been we would have stayed up. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Wasyls Pec Deck said:

Particularly when we gained no sporting advantage. The only team to ‘cheat’ and get it so wrong that we got relegated.

That's us, the amazing Leicester City.

  • Haha 2
Posted
25 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said:

15 points is utterly laughable.

We'd have to win like 19 games to manage above 40 points.

Spurs in 5th got 20 wins lol

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

It’s not going to be 15 points……. The worst penalty is 10 points for going into administration…. So that is a bollocks statement, yet again. 

Edited by Pliskin
  • Like 4
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...