Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
29 minutes ago, Marky mark said:

Wouldn’t it make sense to just pay him off like we did vesterguard 

last year etc 

 

nothing more then a low league championship player prem wages not good enough in league 1

Someone must think we are better paying him to be here than paying him not to be.

Posted
1 hour ago, Marky mark said:

Wouldn’t it make sense to just pay him off like we did vesterguard 

last year etc 

 

nothing more then a low league championship player prem wages not good enough in league 1

Id rather use the money to pay off Faes and Mavididi. Whilst BDCR is limited ability wise, he seems like a decent guy and wont cause any issues or potentially be a bad influence on the youngsters. He will also give 100%. Same cannot be said for the other 2 wasters 

  • Like 3
Posted
On 03/08/2026 at 22:46, Paninistickers said:

Sorry mate, that has to be challenged. I've watched him forensically.

 

On the rare times he touches the ball it's a lottery whether it's a scuff, stubbed toe,.air shot,.miskick,.under hit pass or a (superficially decent) flick round the corner (which I think is a reflex, survivalist 'get rid of it in a way I look professional' manoeuvre he's developed)

 

Of course, like any recreational player he can sometimes kick a ball with relative grace. He clipped in a decent goal at Norwich and calmly finished at Derby. But technically, i mean on a real, granular  technical level, most 5 a side pub players can kick a ball like those.two goals were kicked.  Both were kind of stroked home - which is more to do with timing than technicality.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Spot on. The idea hes technically good is a myth. He seems to have little to no core strength and without that stability it provides you can never be a technically good player at a professional level.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Marky mark said:

Wouldn’t it make sense to just pay him off like we did vesterguard 

last year etc 

 

nothing more then a low league championship player prem wages not good enough in league 1

Yes, but he has to agree.

 

He has to be willing to take a reduce amount, or it not worth it.

 

If he want paying for the whole year he may as well stay. 

Edited by coolhandfox
Posted

The only reason to pay him off if he won't take a reduced amount would be if he was disruptive, but by all accounts he's a good pro so unless he'll do a mutual agreement with lower pay off just keep him around

Posted

Like with Thomas. Yet another manager comes in, picks Bobby Reid for no reason, and it’s like we have 10 men. 

 

Is Russell just completely thick, is he being forced to play him, or what is it?

Posted
1 minute ago, UniFox21 said:

Was in the right places, but should be scoring. Yes we think he's shit, but a player of his quality should be putting at least one of those home.

His overall (lack of) impact outside the box is the biggest issue. The ball doesn’t stick, he’s physically less effectual than even Thomas.
 

With Reid, Cullen, Thomas, Alves and Skipp we have half the outfielders unable to compete physically. We can put a good XI out but it needs to be balanced 

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

You would have thought that League one would be his level, but obviously not.

 

In this league we need a big striker like Steve Howard. In fact he’s only 50 do you think he’d come out of retirement.

  • Like 2
Posted
39 minutes ago, Wortho said:

You would have thought that League one would be his level, but obviously not.

 

In this league we need a big striker like Steve Howard. In fact he’s only 50 do you think he’d come out of retirement.

Defo not 

down the park on a Sunday is his level 

  • Haha 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Paninistickers said:

weak as an adjective doesn't nearly do it justice. 

 

Wings of a butterfly is the nearest power level I can think of

 

.

floats like turd, stings like a ladybird 

  • Haha 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...