Great Boos Up Posted 14 January 2016 Posted 14 January 2016 In a way, we are lucky Cambiasso went. That's a new one ! Thinking about it, it did force the issue that there was a massive hole to fill; and we bought Inler and Kante as additional choices to the courting of Islam Slimani and Veretout. I bet they have both kicked their agents in the b@lls.
Vardinio'sCat Posted 15 January 2016 Posted 15 January 2016 That's a new one ! Yeah, I didn't really expect that to fly! Others who have seen more games than me would undoubtbly beg to differ. I never saw Cambiaso in the flesh, so what do I know?
Countryfox Posted 15 January 2016 Posted 15 January 2016 Yeah, I didn't really expect that to fly! Others who have seen more games than me would undoubtbly beg to differ. I never saw Cambiaso in the flesh, so what do I know? You missed out then puss .... He was a maestro and a pleasure to watch, his vision, incisive passing and motivation to other players was brilliant .... But would he be better for us now than DD ?? ..... Possibly not ... But great to have on the bench and a (big) cut above Inler .... although I think he will improve if he stays.
brookfox Posted 15 January 2016 Posted 15 January 2016 Got to imagine with both James coming back to fitness and Amartey looking like signing we're all set for holding midfielders leaving Inler free to leave.
Ric Flair Posted 15 January 2016 Posted 15 January 2016 I still don't want him to leave but I suppose it's inevitable.
HighPeakFox Posted 15 January 2016 Posted 15 January 2016 I'd be sad if he leaves - whatever his difficulties assimilating, he seems a good pro, has talent.........that one pass in the cup at Spurs gave us a glimpse of his pedigree, I hope we get to see more, but would understand if we don't.
HoustonFox Posted 15 January 2016 Posted 15 January 2016 He looked pretty pissed off on Wednesday when he didn't get to come on as a sub... I think in a way that's good as it shows he's hungry to play...
MPH Posted 15 January 2016 Posted 15 January 2016 Going out on a loan move would be great. If he plays a belter we'll be able to get more money for him than we would right now
Thracian Posted 15 January 2016 Posted 15 January 2016 He looked pretty pissed off on Wednesday when he didn't get to come on as a sub... I think in a way that's good as it shows he's hungry to play... I'd imagine both King and Inler will be on the bench against Villa and will be used in the Cup match next week. We can't run our club according to Inler's International requirements. Other players have the same considerations too but it's Leicester City paying their wages and for Leicester's manager to select his teams as he sees fit. King had easily as much right to be aggrieved at not being picked as Inler, but he just gets on with it. What Inler's done lately - and at last - is to show enough improvement to at least merit a place in the squad. Whether he can add to that remains to be seen. Biased eyes might see it differently but, for me, he's still not earned the right to take anyone's place.
richardsfoxes Posted 15 January 2016 Posted 15 January 2016 Depending on where Claudio see's Amartey playing surely brings questions to Kings and Inler's future, i mean King is what 27 years old he doesn't want to be sitting on the bench and is he really going to get ahead of Ama, Kante, Drinky and you have the young lad coming through Hamza.
foxes21 Posted 15 January 2016 Posted 15 January 2016 Depending on where Claudio see's Amartey playing surely brings questions to Kings and Inler's future, i mean King is what 27 years old he doesn't want to be sitting on the bench and is he really going to get ahead of Ama, Kante, Drinky and you have the young lad coming through Hamza. I have a feeling Drinkwater, Kante, Amartey, King & James will be our 5 central midfielders, next season. Inler to leave in the summer..
Wymsey Posted 15 January 2016 Posted 15 January 2016 I think he should play a bit against Villa; a team that will try and push forwards.
lifted*fox Posted 18 January 2016 Posted 18 January 2016 In retrospect he probably should have played a little bit against Villa. In the second half we definitely needed someone to grasp the game by the balls - we couldn't hold on anything in the middle of the park. The more I think about it the more baffling the Okazaki / De Laet substitution becomes. Absolutely baffling.
Stevosevic Posted 18 January 2016 Posted 18 January 2016 In retrospect he probably should have played a little bit against Villa. In the second half we definitely needed someone to grasp the game by the balls - we couldn't hold on anything in the middle of the park. The more I think about it the more baffling the Okazaki / De Laet substitution becomes. Absolutely baffling. I agree, i would have thought he'd bring on Inler or Kind seeing how the game was going.
MC Prussian Posted 28 January 2016 Posted 28 January 2016 Swansea are allegedly after him. Swiss tabloid "Blick" report today that the Welsh club, led by Inler's former manager Francesco Guidolin (whom he knows from his days at Udinese), would like to sign Inler on loan until the end of the season.
Ric Flair Posted 28 January 2016 Posted 28 January 2016 Swansea are allegedly after him. Swiss tabloid "Blick" report today that the Welsh club, led by Inler's former manager Francesco Guidolin (whom he knows from his days at Udinese), would like to sign Inler on loan until the end of the season. Might be a good move for all parties and Amartey's
Monsell1976 Posted 28 January 2016 Posted 28 January 2016 Might be a good move for all parties and Amartey'sAgreed, would be even better if they allowed us to send dyer back at no cost as well
Babylon Posted 31 January 2016 Posted 31 January 2016 Stuff popping up on Twitter about him going to Hamburg.
dannythefox Posted 31 January 2016 Posted 31 January 2016 Stuff popping up on Twitter about him going to Hamburg. to be fair if James is nearly back it wouldn't be a problem.
Tuna Posted 31 January 2016 Posted 31 January 2016 He's a 'champion' as Claudio would say. Useful to have around, but unfortunately going out of the cup means his season is over.
lgfualol Posted 31 January 2016 Posted 31 January 2016 Would rather keep him and send James on loan but Inler will want to keep his captaincy and play at the Euros.
MPH Posted 31 January 2016 Posted 31 January 2016 Wonder if that's why the French bloke is maybe signing
MC Prussian Posted 31 January 2016 Posted 31 January 2016 Swiss newspapers say trying to sign Inler on loan comes with a heavy financial burden, which has prevented potential suitors taking him on - his loan fee for half a year/season is quoted as being in the region of 3 million Euro (£2.3m).
ramboacdc Posted 31 January 2016 Posted 31 January 2016 Swiss newspapers say trying to sign Inler on loan comes with a heavy financial burden, which has prevented potential suitors taking him on - his loan fee for half a year/season is quoted as being in the region of 3 million Euro (£2.3m). thought as much. massive money contract is the only reason he hasn't moved.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.