Vardy & LCFC Charged by the FA - Charges Accepted & Personal Hearing Requested

[Bob Weasel Fox]

This is still winding me up, it's beyond a joke how much that fat cunt has wound me up.

Been in a bad mood (Worse than usual ) since Sunday and it's not changed once.

I hope something happens to him on Thursday, another sub standard performance causing a massive brawl with him being the centre of it and getting hurt, another major fuck up causing him to be stuck off/The FA take action (Never gonna happen, they're always gonna back their boys), get a bad injury during the game, a sniper in the crowd...I dunno, I just want this man to fail now, he already has failed but it needs to be acknowledged.

Won't really help our situation but it'd certainly be karma.

Obviously I wouldn't condone any sort of violence

But this fat Spurs supporting **** does make my blood boil aswell Matt, has potentially ruined a great season

[Captain...]

Agree with every word of this but I'm not sure any manager in the whole of the Premier League would've reacted like that, let alone the fans - so difficult to say that we should react like Ranieri when I'm not sure I could've.

 

I've never booed a referee before but as a paying season ticket holder I want to see a fair, consistent match and he ruined any chance of that so don't regret booing him off the pitch.

 

I'm not saying don't boo the cvnt, but throwing water at him and confronting him after the game is going too far. I'm sure that Ranieri would like to buy him a nice new pair of cement shoes, but he isn't just being a nice guy by not talking about. He's smart, he knows the game and he knows there can be consequences so he doesn't talk about it. Vardy should have done the same the consequences of his outburst, however justified he may have been, could be devastating.

[messerschmitt]

Could Vardy appeal and claim he was talking to Kante?

[Captain...]

Could Vardy appeal and claim he was talking to Kante?

 

I did wonder if could claim he was saying, "Nooo!, you fvcking can't!" in his northern accent.

 

Like when he said "Oi! Chap!

[st albans fox]

The footage has since been taken down, what we see here is after the game, Jon moss confronting and pointing in the face of other officials.... funny that eh

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

 

He asked who Andrew Neville was - 'is he the secretary?'. and he went back to confront him. whether this was because AN said something as he walked past or more likely wanted to complain about the treatment he got leaving the pitch.

[suffolk fox]

Why would anyone throw water at a man who has just been running around for 90 minutes? He probably found it refreshing. If you're going to throw something, throw coins, or darts, something that's actually going to hurt the fat pr1ck, you know?

Perhaps it was a colostomy bag after the old uns had abused Gold and Sullivan. It was a highly charged football match swearing happens both Gold and Sullivan should be ashamed Leicester fans swoar at us etc, etc. Deary me.

[Guest ttfn]

I did wonder if could claim he was saying, "Nooo!, you fvcking can't!" in his northern accent.

Like when he said "Oi! Chap!

Should use the John Terry excuse of "did you think I called you a fvcking cvnt?"

Apparently that stands up in a court of law so should be no problem getting off at the FA.

[Floridafox]

Although there's no conspiracy, we've been unfortunate with the price we've had to pay with both our sendings off this season. In the Arsenal game, there's no doubting Simpson's two bookings were soft and probably the second yellow crowd inspired, and it cost us at least a point, almost certainly 3.

On Sunday, we were undone by a referee who was uncomfortably out of his depth and let events get the better of his judgement. No way was Vardy's first a yellow so the second yellow would have been academic. As it was, the sending off probably cost us 2 points as we were easily the more dangerous team up to that point.

But we bounced back well in adversity after Arsenal and I reckon we'll do it again.

Excellent. Can we make this thing said on the matter and move on to talking tactics, team selection and teams with nothing to play for on the beach already

[Matt]

Not sure this has been posted anywhere, i've not seen it.

 

 

FA writes to Andy Carroll and Slaven Bilic over Leicester comments

 

The Football Association has written to Andy Carroll and Slaven Bilic in relation to their comments following West Ham's 2-2 draw at Leicester on Sunday.

 

The Hammers striker and his manager have until close of business on Thursday to reply to the FA which will consider whether the pair's comments questioned the integrity of match referee Jon Moss.

 

Carroll felt the stoppage-time penalty given against him for a tackle on Jeff Schlupp - converted by Leonardo Ulloa to rescue a point for the Premier League leaders - was wrong.

 

"It was always going to happen [a penalty]," he told Sky Sports' Geoff Shreeves after the game.

 

"It's hard for the ref, but all game it's been happening… then you see the one that was given against me, he's gone down before I've even got him. 

 

"He's [schlupp] took a touch, the ref's looking to even it [the game] out."

 

Carroll had equalised from the penalty spot with six minutes to play when Moss - who had earlier sent off Leicester goalscorer Jamie Vardy for simulation - ruled Wes Morgan had dragged down Winston Reid following a corner.

 

Aaron Cresswell quickly gave Hammers the lead which they held until Carroll was penalised five minutes into stoppage time.

 

Vardy has been charged with improper conduct following his dismissal, while the FA is also investigating allegations Moss was verbally abused by Leicester officials after the game.

 

 

 

Atleast they have a change to respond, a chance to explain theirselves instead of being charged from the off.

 

Although i'm not sure why Bilic has been mentioned, i'll be honest I struggled to understand his interview but I took it that he was sticking up for the referee and supporting him basically saying 'they have a hard job' - He probably didn't mean any of it, but just to save any trouble just claimed to have those opinions.

[StanSP]

He asked who Andrew Neville was - 'is he the secretary?'. and he went back to confront him. whether this was because AN said something as he walked past or more likely wanted to complain about the treatment he got leaving the pitch.

 

I thought he said 'is he talking to me'

But I don't know what Neville might have said so the context is a bit out.

[DJ Barry Hammond]

You can't point a finger towards someone's face but you can label them a cheat in public! 

Since when should anyone be able to effectively rule someone a cheat with sparse and questionable evidence and expect them not to react?. Kids have little  to do with it really - they'll cope and set their own standards if people stop pampering them and sheltering them from reality. 

Exactly what is "decent" and defensible in denying someone a penalty when he's clearly and evidentially being held back and then ruling him a cheat for capitalising on the initial offence? That's not cheating it's showing an opponent they shouldn't get away with fouling him.  

Is punishing the victim rather than the culprit the sort of example an official should set the precious kids for all that it is so often the way these days?.

In fact where was the referee's "example" to anyone in the supposedly required "fair administration of the rules"

He was totally wrong in the Vardy instance but in so many others he punished the relatively innocuous but allowed more blatant offences to go unchecked.

Apply that to a courtroom and the judge might just as well forget the tedium of weighing the evidence and simply spin a coin to decide guilt or otherwise. A great example to kids, that, yet it was apparent from start to finish. There was no consistency whatsoever and the level of offending by both sides went from bad to worse until it was all but farcical to see in the end, particularly in the penalty areas.

At any one instance you could see all sorts of fouls. It's hardly surprising that players react when the referee totally ignores so much that's going on (even when it was clear for him to see) but then picks someone out almost at random.

This is crap Thracian and you know it!

One of the biggest points people forget - the only reason you know there was an arm on Vardy's shoulder is because of the behind the goal camera... However it's impossible to tell that from behind them to any certainty.

You also seem to forget that the referee is deemed the judge of the field... They, based on the evidence provided have to make a decision in line with the lose laws that can be interpreted in various ways. If you speak out against a judge - you get done for contempt, regardless of the reasons - so sport imitates the justice of life.

In a way I'm not suprised you've gone to the narrow position on this... It's kind of your modus operandi, but then again, it's quite sad because you're an intelligent guy and better than this.

[TheMightySystem]

Not sure this has been posted anywhere, i've not seen it.

 

 

 

 

Atleast they have a change to respond, a chance to explain theirselves instead of being charged from the off.

 

Although i'm not sure why Bilic has been mentioned, i'll be honest I struggled to understand his interview but I took it that he was sticking up for the referee and supporting him basically saying 'they have a hard job' - He probably didn't mean any of it, but just to save any trouble just claimed to have those opinions.

One thing I don't understand is couldn't anyone charged because of comments made after a game in interviews combat the charges with a right to free speech?

[TheUltimateWinner]

One thing I don't understand is couldn't anyone charged because of comments made after a game in interviews combat the charges with a right to free speech?

I've always thought this too, don't know if anyone has ever tried to fight back?

[FoxSince88]

Wonder why the club haven't censored the bit where schlupp comes and and says F**king N**heads

[WigstonWanderer]

The ref had a bad game. Including giving us a very soft penalty.

TV replays are all very well and may well happen in the future. My guess is that if the ref had a chance to view it again, he probably would have stood by his decision to show a second yellow.

Yes, but what about the first? I keep going on about it but I think that's where the real mistake was made. Without that this whole deluge of shit would never have occurred. The second was more debatable.

Either way, Vardy should have bitten his tongue, but all in the heat of the moment I suppose.

One more thing though. Would Jamie have been quite so outraged if he had really dived? He must have felt in his own mind that he had been fouled. The righteous anger certainly did not look simulated.

[fuchsntf]

Yes, but what about the first? I keep going on about it but I think that's where the real mistake was made. Without that this whole deluge of shit would never have occurred. The second was more debatable.

Either way, Vardy should have bitten his tongue, but all in the heat of the moment I suppose.

One more thing though. Would Jamie have been quite so outraged if he had really dived? He must have felt in his own mind that he had been fouled. The righteous anger certainly did not look simulated.

RE last sentence, or he acted like any typical Anglo-saxon, he got found out, and was so disgusted,

and upset, he had to let it out somehow.

[Great Boos Up]

One thing I don't understand is couldn't anyone charged because of comments made after a game in interviews combat the charges with a right to free speech?

But we don't have free speech, That's America. You can't just say what you want to the media.

[Guest ttfn]

Hypothetically - would you take a 2 point deduction for Vardy being available for the next 2 games?

[Simmo86]

Hypothetically - would you take a 2 point deduction for Vardy being available for the next 2 games?

No

[The Doctor]

Hypothetically - would you take a 2 point deduction for Vardy being available for the next 2 games?

 

I can't see Vardys presence being worth 2 more points from the next two than we should realistically get, and the increased pressure of having Spurs only 3 back would be even more difficult; so no.

[Guest ttfn]

I can't see Vardys presence being worth 2 more points from the next two than we should realistically get, and the increased pressure of having Spurs only 3 back would be even more difficult; so no.

What about 1?

[The Doctor]

What about 1?

 

1 point less and 1 game ban less? Still being 2 games clear of Spurs would be more comfortable so yes.

[Carl the Llama]

The most sickening thing about all this is after catching up on this thread I'm genuinely struggling to tell the difference between this place and that Spurs forum.  Come on chaps.

[Fox 4 Life]

I assume the club will wait until Thursday to respond? Surely better to get this over with so we know what we're working with!

[shen]

I assume the club will wait until Thursday to respond? Surely better to get this over with so we know what we're working with!

 

It probably also means that the FA won't make a final decision either way until after the deadline.