Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
HankMarvin

Tammy Abraham

Recommended Posts

On 02/06/2017 at 11:29, sylofox said:

Not claiming to be itk on this as what I'm saying is from a Chelsea fan. 

 

We were in for him and we made 2 offers both turned down. They will only loan him and we only want to buy him. He claims our second bid was 18m and we offered a buy back clause.

 

As I say that's from a Chelsea fan not the person I get my info from. So it could be total bollox.

What I find most concerning is we are still offering buy back clauses. I know it's not the same thing but thought we would of learnt by now with Kante's release clause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bluearmyfox28 said:

What I find most concerning is we are still offering buy back clauses. I know it's not the same thing but thought we would of learnt by now with Kante's release clause.

We ain't manure if we really want him and it gets us him all well and good.

 

But as I said it was from a Chelsea fan and may be bollox.

 

As for the one release clause Kante he and his agent insisted on it. Would you rather we never signed him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sylofox said:

We ain't manure if we really want him and it gets us him all well and good.

 

But as I said it was from a Chelsea fan and may be bollox.

 

As for the one release clause Kante he and his agent insisted on it. Would you rather we never signed him?

I would rather we learn from our mistake & not put the clauses so low if you have that much faith in a player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Bluearmyfox28 said:

I would rather we learn from our mistake & not put the clauses so low if you have that much faith in a player.

Was it a mistakes turn 5m into 30+m in one season. We had seen something in him but no one else had. Had the big clubs been in for him we would never have got him.

 

Unfortunately it seems the money was wasted last summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, AmarteyAndChill said:

How do these foreign clubs sign these players down with such huge release clauses. It's ridiculous.

Legal requirement to have a release clause in Spain, suspect it is elsewhere too. And sometimes because of that, if you're giving a player a really low release clause, they're going to feel like they're not valued.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dmayne7 said:

Legal requirement to have a release clause in Spain, suspect it is elsewhere too. And sometimes because of that, if you're giving a player a really low release clause, they're going to feel like they're not valued.

I remember that Martins indi signed for Porto after he had a very good World Cup (2014) and I read that he had a £50m release clause and I just thought, what? lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, m4DD0gg said:

Bloody joke.

 

One target missed already. Wonder how many more it will be before we are balls deep into August with the same fecking squad.

Chill, It's still so early. We didn't want him on loan, I agree we shouldn't be a club to prepare players for the top 6 anyway so I'm quite happy. If we negotiated and they wouldn't sell that's just how it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, m4DD0gg said:

Bloody joke.

 

One target missed already. Wonder how many more it will be before we are balls deep into August with the same fecking squad.

You don't even know he was actually a target.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Nickfosse said:

I read that Chelsea were insisting on a loan and guaranteed starts in the league. If true, I'm not sure we could have offered that. 

Not sure we would want to. Why would we want to help develop somebody else's youth when our own can't get a game for us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Nickfosse said:

I read that Chelsea were insisting on a loan and guaranteed starts in the league. Not sure we could have offered that. 

Loan players that we have had in the past inc from Chelsea have come with a clause that basically the more you use the player the less they cost.

 

Makes sense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we have no idea if we ever really wanted him, no idea if we made and offer, no idea what the terms of said offer might have been (if we even made one), no idea what Chelsea were asking, not one single quote from anyone from either Club, nothing from the player and yet we are all certain that Rudkin fvcked up and our club is ruined.

 

This country,

 

X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Innovindil said:

Not sure we would want to. Why would we want to help develop somebody else's youth when our own can't get a game for us. 

Haha I was going to say that. He'd get one game playing left wing and then spend the rest of the season with the youth team and getting 1 u23 game a month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest Cujek
On 2017-6-7 at 05:55, m4DD0gg said:

Bloody joke.

 

One target missed already. Wonder how many more it will be before we are balls deep into August with the same fecking squad.

How do you know he was even a target?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...