Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
bovril

Unpopular Opinions You Hold

By bovril, in General Chat

Recommended Posts

Fox92

Fox92

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, LiberalFox said:

Jokes about Spurs not winning anything are a bit boring. Also we don't have a rivalry with Spurs. I don't want us to turn into Forest who think they are rivals with Liverpool. 

The forced rivalry is weird, I can't stand the chants we will no doubt come out with next season (especially considering we've been relegated in between), but Spurs' fanbase seems entitled so I don't want them to win anything. Same with Leeds and Newcastle.

ramboacdc

ramboacdc

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, LiberalFox said:

Jokes about Spurs not winning anything are a bit boring. Also we don't have a rivalry with Spurs. I don't want us to turn into Forest who think they are rivals with Liverpool. 

Forest claims they have a rivalry with Liverpool? Good lord that is a stretch and a half....

Corky

Corky

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, LiberalFox said:

Jokes about Spurs not winning anything are a bit boring. Also we don't have a rivalry with Spurs. I don't want us to turn into Forest who think they are rivals with Liverpool. 

Agreed. Hope this Leeds thing ends soon, too. "Ooh, their fans have been nasty about us on Twitter. Let's spend pages moaning about it".

MPH

MPH

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, LiberalFox said:

Jokes about Spurs not winning anything are a bit boring. Also we don't have a rivalry with Spurs. I don't want us to turn into Forest who think they are rivals with Liverpool. 


 

I agree that we won’t have a rivalry with Spurs, but it DID  leave a bitter taste in my mouth how they carried on during our league winning season. Kane didn’t help himself with the picture of the Lions and you can blame Vardy and his response if some see it as a rivalry.

 

 

i will admit however, marking jibes about them not winning much recently is a lot of fun for reasons already mentioned.

Sly

Sly

Posted
Posted

It annoys me that each county votes at different times.
 

Why isn’t everyone voting tonight for a new local councillor and then this tallies up, so the party with the most votes runs the country. 
 

Also, why oh why am I voting on who the police chief commissioner is. 85% of people have no idea or can not resonate with them. It’s like conducting interviews at work, then ask every member of staff to vote on who they want. 

 

It is all a farce. I need to buy an island in the middle of the ocean somewhere. 

ozleicester

ozleicester

Posted
Posted (edited)

The entire justice system needs a shake up...  Blackstone's ratio and innocent until proven guilty isnt viable in modern society.

Edited by ozleicester
Daggers

Daggers

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, ozleicester said:

The entire justice system needs a shake up...  Blackstone's ratio and innocent until proven guilty isnt viable in modern society.

Found guilty, eh?

 

The bastards. 

  • Haha 2
Mike Oxlong

Mike Oxlong

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Sly said:

It annoys me that each county votes at different times.
 

Why isn’t everyone voting tonight for a new local councillor and then this tallies up, so the party with the most votes runs the country. 
 

Also, why oh why am I voting on who the police chief commissioner is. 85% of people have no idea or can not resonate with them. It’s like conducting interviews at work, then ask every member of staff to vote on who they want. 

 

It is all a farce. I need to buy an island in the middle of the ocean somewhere. 

The person formerly known as HRH The Prince Andrew looks forward to his invitation to your island and in line with established protocol requests that suitable arrangements are made for him to receive “daily massages” during his stay 

  • Haha 1
Dunge

Dunge

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, Parafox said:

I may be in a minority but, BGT is an entertaining talent show.

I’m certain you are in a minority but I agree.

filthyfox

filthyfox

Posted
Posted

Anything Government related that you have to rely on is SHIT.

 

THREE EFFING MONTHS for an access to work application to even be sniffed, let alone fully assessed!

 

2 years for a breathing related health issue to be seen by a consultant. 

 

I am SO GLAD the country is heading for change!

  • Like 1
filthyfox

filthyfox

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 02/05/2024 at 16:14, Fox92 said:

The forced rivalry is weird, I can't stand the chants we will no doubt come out with next season (especially considering we've been relegated in between), but Spurs' fanbase seems entitled so I don't want them to win anything. Same with Leeds and Newcastle.

I will never agree with anything that states I shouldn't HATE Spurs with every sinew, and the core of my being!

Edited by filthyfox
Parafox

Parafox

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Dr The Singh said:

Its the talentless ones that make it entertaining 

 

Yes, but there's some amazing acts that turn up.

Zear0

Zear0

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

Can you be racist against a Moldovan dancing dog ?? 

I have been in the past.

  • Haha 2
FoxyPV

FoxyPV

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, filthyfox said:

Anything Government related that you have to rely on is SHIT.

 

THREE EFFING MONTHS for an access to work application to even be sniffed, let alone fully assessed!

 

2 years for a breathing related health issue to be seen by a consultant. 

 

I am SO GLAD the country is heading for change!

If only there was some obvious reason.....

 

Fvxk the tories

Screenshot_20240504-202343.png

Zear0

Zear0

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, FoxyPV said:

If only there was some obvious reason.....

 

Fvxk the tories

Screenshot_20240504-202343.png

That include the £350mil a week? 

  • Haha 1
kenny

kenny

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, Zear0 said:

That include the £350mil a week? 

It overlooks the years in grey where labour were in power. I can't think of a good reason why the creator of the graph would do that.

leicsmac

leicsmac

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, kenny said:

It overlooks the years in grey where labour were in power. I can't think of a good reason why the creator of the graph would do that.

Because there are enough data points over enough time (nearly 50 years) to establish the rather obvious point about funds a critical social service adequately and who doesn't as it is.

  • Like 1
kenny

kenny

Posted
Posted
Just now, leicsmac said:

Because there are enough data points over enough time (nearly 50 years) to establish the rather obvious point about funds a critical social service adequately and who doesn't as it is.

It's certainly a point of view.

 

It's also interesting that it stops at 2017. 

 

I am sure there is no reason for that either. It would be a shame if the data was manipulated for nefarious means.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...