Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Steven

Wolves A Post Match Thread 4 - 3

By Steven, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

the fox

the fox

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Dr The Singh said:

cP?

 

Could be. Like I said many times before, I'm neither for or against Puel. If the owner thinks that keeping him is good for the club then so be it. If he wants to sack him then so be it. What's important is the the club not managers or players.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nicolo Barella

Nicolo Barella

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, AlloverthefloorYesNdidi said:

Gray had the most chances the first half and tested the keeper ok at least once. His goal in the second half was great. Puel changed nothing, which i thought wasnt right, but apparently laid into them and it was the right choice

 

I dont think it was the game for Simpson though and Puel shouldnt have started him imo.

He had the most chances the first half, but there were so, so many times when he gave the ball away or dribbled his way into a situation where he should have passed through it and it was painfully obvious Maddison should have started there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, 49er said:

Wolves' second goal should not have stood as the ball was outside the quadrant when the corner kick was taken

True.    Why hawk-eye cannot sort that one out is a mystery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dorsetboy

dorsetboy

Posted
Posted

If Maguire is going let's get benkovic back now and get him and soyenchu playing together ready for next season 

 

Simpson was shocking all game he left his side exposed and Mendy had a poor game , ndidi seems to have lost his way a little this season and for the love of God if we get a new manager let him play to vardys strength and use the immense pace we have in our side .

 

We have one of the youngest sides in the league and some very promising young talent 

 

We just need the right man to come in and show them the way ,this unrest can't be doing them any good and I'm sure some will be looking for a way out 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ricey

Ricey

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, the fox said:

An awful team still won. They are inconsistent (beating spurs than losing to CP the next game) but they scored enough goals to win.

That’s my point though. We were beaten by a team that played badly so I’m not taken much solace in the fact they are a good side.

 

They played into our hands today and we still lost.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
gw_leics772

gw_leics772

Posted
Posted

Been out since football ended and not got time to read the whole thread, but i can guess what its like.

 

I'll just echo what every one else has said then - good game that after a slow start, finally found a way through a packed defence. Good subs by puel? And things are looking up ?????????????????????

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Dan LCFC

Dan LCFC

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

That's the 9th game in 11 we've gone 1-0 down.

 

That is the fundamental problem with Puel. We're playing catch-up football all of the time. You will never sustain a jot of success with such an appalling habit.

 

It's too little too late, too many times.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Parafox

Parafox

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, StriderHiryu said:

Well that was game of the season, just sad that we lost it! I feel knackered after watching that! It was the best going forward we've been since Southampton away last season. All of the forward players did well. Anyone who thinks that was boring needs to have a word with themselves.

 

As for our defence... totally shambolic. All of them, Simpson, Maguire, Morgan and Evans culpable for conceding. But you can't blame the manager for that, they were all individual errors and Puel was telling them to calm down at the 90 minute mark.

 

We won't go down this season, so it's all about trying to bed in new players and improve. Gray was good today, Barnes had an impact. Get behind the team I say!

One of the few posts of common sense realism on here. Dreadfully naïve defending, considering how solid we've been so far. I think Puel had the midfield set up right but still cannot find anyone to link up with Vardy, which is probably more to do with the formation he's using. The back four, with the possible exception of Evans, were very poor and almost lost as if they weren't communicating with each other.

How on earth did Morgan, with all his experience, not anticipate the ball over the top for Wolve's 3rd goal and react sooner. By the time he got the ball down off his chest, Jota still had the space and time to knock it forward and leave Wes for dead.

Despite his goal, WM is one of our (many) liabilities.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Parafox

Parafox

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, H.a.r.r.y said:

Awful today, surely this plonker can't be in a job any longer

Defensively, yes, when normally we're pretty decent there. 3 goals away from home against a good, newly promoted team with players I'd quite like to see here? Not as bad as you imply. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
H.a.r.r.y

H.a.r.r.y

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Parafox said:

Defensively, yes, when normally we're pretty decent there. 3 goals away from home against a good, newly promoted team with players I'd quite like to see here? Not as bad as you imply. 

2-0 in the first 10 minutes. no one can shoot nor defend and don't get me started on that abomination of a 'midfield' should cut their wages, not worth that much money. i can find better in the U18 team down the road

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bert

Bert

Posted
Posted

We handed this game to them on a plate. Not only are we too easy to play against but every goal they scored was avoidable and some sort of balls up from us was involved. 

 

Gray and then Simpson to blame for the first. Gray gives the ball away. Simpson lets the man run in from behind him. 

 

Second goal, Ricardo loses his man giving him a free run on Maguire. 

 

Third goal. Firstly N’Didi. He stood off of Neves and then let him wander 10 yards forward before pinging a ball over the top of Morgan. What on Earth was N’Didi doing? He didn’t even consider closing him down. 

 

Fourth goal. Firstly a dreadful attempt of a ball into their box (can’t remember who from) then Neves is again given the freedom of the pitch. Plays a skewed ball forward which Evans half heartedly goes for and Chilwell lets the ball run by and we are 2 on 2 under pressure. EDIT - it was N’Didi. The bloke who can’t pass for shit tries Hollywood in the 93rd lol 

 

The defending was a shambles an absolute disgrace. I actually thought we looked ok going forward. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
shade

shade

Posted
Posted
Just now, Bert said:

We handed this game to them on a plate. Not only are we too easy to play against but every goal they scored was avoidable and some sort of balls up from us was involved. 

 

Gray and then Simpson to blame for the first. Gray gives the ball away. Simpson lets the man run in from behind him. 

 

Second goal, Ricardo loses his man giving him a free run on Maguire. 

 

Third goal. Firstly N’Didi. He stood off of Neves and then let him wander 10 yards forward before pinging a ball over the top of Morgan. What on Earth was N’Didi doing? He didn’t even consider closing him down. 

 

Fourth goal. Firstly a dreadful attempt of a ball into their box (can’t remember who from) then Neves is again given the freedom of the pitch. Plays a skewed ball forward which Evans half heartedly goes for and Chilwell lets the ball run by and we are 2 on 2 under pressure. The defending was a shambles an absolute disgrace. I actually thought we looked ok going forward. 

someone who knows the rules could clarify this for me, but should the 4th goal have been disallowed?

 

the goal scorer was well in an offside position when the ball was played to the guy who passed to him, given that the ball was then passed to him, wouldn’t that have given him an advantage even though he was onside when he received it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...