AKCJ Posted 3 March 2019 Posted 3 March 2019 3-4-3. Rate the idea, lets see how it goes. Harsh on Gray though to be fair. Played well on Tuesday.
shailen Posted 3 March 2019 Posted 3 March 2019 Interesting. Certainly did not see 3 at the back coming
Jimothy Posted 3 March 2019 Posted 3 March 2019 THREE AT THE BACK!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL, I REPEAT THIS IS NOT A DRILL! WE'RE PLAYING THREE AT THE BACK!!
lgfualol Posted 3 March 2019 Posted 3 March 2019 Finally. Would prefer Soyuncu though, that back 3 would be outpaced by Ulloa.
Scotch Posted 3 March 2019 Posted 3 March 2019 Well, alot of us have been asking for 3 at the back for a while now.... Let's see how it goes.
Babylon Posted 3 March 2019 Posted 3 March 2019 Harsh on Gary who I thought was excellent against Brighton, but a decent fit for the players we have.
urban.spaceman Posted 3 March 2019 Author Posted 3 March 2019 Just now, evil jack said: Oof. Wes back in. Déjà Puel.
AlloverthefloorYesNdidi Posted 3 March 2019 Posted 3 March 2019 So its ok to have Morgan if its a back 3? Interesting
Farrington fox Posted 3 March 2019 Posted 3 March 2019 3 at the back, this might be interesting, should be more solid anyway. Hope I don't regret saying that. Coyb
H.a.r.r.y Posted 3 March 2019 Posted 3 March 2019 2 minutes ago, evil jack said: Oof. Wes back in. that is odd, i would've put sonacyuututuyyyioyi in
foxfanazer Posted 3 March 2019 Posted 3 March 2019 On the face of it I don't like it but fingers crossed it works. COYB!
Tuna Posted 3 March 2019 Posted 3 March 2019 Just now, Babylon said: Harsh on Gary who I thought was excellent against Brighton, but a decent fit for the players we have. Well, he's pushing 60 now.
Wolfox Posted 3 March 2019 Posted 3 March 2019 No messing about then…. Straight in with his own ideas tough on Gray who had a good game Tuesday
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.