VLC86 Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 42 minutes ago, Bakey said: Makes sense but he is 28 in November, so not that young Yeah I didn’t realise he was 28. 1
Arriba Los Zorros Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 5 hours ago, Blue Fox 72 said: Glad to see your stance on this signing appears to be mellowing somewhat. Maybe in a couple of days you'll be saying gerrimin. Haha! I am very very much against signing Tarkowski it is a reactionary rather than proactive planning transfer and think it goes completely against what has got us to this position in the first place. Trying to tone down my posts to not upset those of a sensitive disposition@HighPeakFox 2 1
VLC86 Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 Just now, Arriba Los Zorros said: Haha! I am very very much against signing Tarkowski it is a reactionary rather than proactive planning transfer and think it goes completely against what has got us to this position in the first place. Trying to tone down my posts to not upset those of a sensitive disposition@HighPeakFox Sometimes deviating from that plan will be needed to sign the right player. Look at Man U under Fergie. Paid over the odds for Robin Van Persie and he didnt fit their usual formula but he pretty much single handedly fired them to the title that year. 3
Brenfox Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 17 minutes ago, Steve Earle said: Let me think, who do I believe? Tabloids and Sky Sports saying Burnley want £54M, or @UpTheLeagueFox saying they want around £30M? In case it isn't obvious, it's Geoff I believe... I've said it before don't believe Geoff. I asked him to play Chesney Hawkes One & Only in Le Venue in 1993. He said yes.......i'm still waiting. 2
UpTheLeagueFox Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 19 minutes ago, Brenfox said: I've said it before don't believe Geoff. I asked him to play Chesney Hawkes One & Only in Le Venue in 1993. He said yes.......i'm still waiting. I only worked there in 1997. YOU ARE FAKE NEWS BREN 2
OllieLodge96 Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 40 minutes ago, Costock_Fox said: Yeah I didn’t realise he was 28. Johnny Evans is 32...
Bakey Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 (edited) 2 minutes ago, OllieLodge96 said: Johnny Evans is 32... He's 28 in November. But Johnny Evans was £3m and a professional who had done it all with Man Utd. Tarkowski has done it at Burnley and would cost at least 10x the price! Edited 7 September 2020 by Bakey 4
st albans fox Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 he's dug himself a bit of a hole saying he wants CL football. if he moves to west ham then its obvious that he just wants a big payday. he could argue a move to us brings him a European adventure and more chance of CL qualification. west ham's board have made a huge rod for their backs over the sale of diangana. so they may well go over the top to secure JT.
murphy Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 56 minutes ago, Arriba Los Zorros said: Haha! I am very very much against signing Tarkowski it is a reactionary rather than proactive planning transfer and think it goes completely against what has got us to this position in the first place. Trying to tone down my posts to not upset those of a sensitive disposition@HighPeakFox We have been linked with Tarkowski in several previous windows. 3
st albans fox Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 Apparently Brentford have a 20% sell on clause
Popular Post Fox seen in Norwich Posted 7 September 2020 Popular Post Posted 7 September 2020 21 minutes ago, Bakey said: He's 28 in November. But Johnny Evans was £3m and a professional who had done it all with Man Utd. Tarkowski has done it at Burnley and would cost at least 10x the price! This just demonstrates what a Steal Evans was Maguire had only done it at Leicester but cost £80m 7
Muzzy_Larsson Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 2 minutes ago, Fox seen in Norwich said: This just demonstrates what a Steal Evans was Maguire had only done it at Leicester but cost £80m The World Cup probably inflated Maguire's value a fair bit. 1
Fox seen in Norwich Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 3 minutes ago, Muzzy_Larsson said: The World Cup probably inflated Maguire's value a fair bit. Sshh, I deliberately ignored that fact to make my point 😏 2
MickeyMouse Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 1 hour ago, Steve Earle said: Let me think, who do I believe? Tabloids and Sky Sports saying Burnley want £54M, or @UpTheLeagueFox saying they want around £30M? In case it isn't obvious, it's Geoff I believe... Cheers Geoff!
OllieLodge96 Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 1 hour ago, Bakey said: He's 28 in November. But Johnny Evans was £3m and a professional who had done it all with Man Utd. Tarkowski has done it at Burnley and would cost at least 10x the price! Pretty sure from what I've read he had a release clause in his contract that made him available for what we got for him if they were to be relegated. If you recall in the summer transfer window before Man City were after him and West Brom quoted about £25m
UHDrive Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 (edited) ' Edited 7 September 2020 by UHDrive Typo
Les-TA-Jon Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 Are we actually in for him? I know we need more CBs and the old adage of 'only sign players good enough for the first 11' but if we did get him, does Evans drop to the bench? Surely not?
Leeds Fox Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 1 hour ago, UHDrive said: If he wants a move then slap a transfer request in. 28 yrs old in November is stupid business for anything over 30k + add ons. If we can get him for 30k we’re laughing! 1
Leeds Fox Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 33 minutes ago, Les-TA-Jon said: Are we actually in for him? I know we need more CBs and the old adage of 'only sign players good enough for the first 11' but if we did get him, does Evans drop to the bench? Surely not? They’ll rotate as required surely. We have Europa League too, or we could be going to a back 3 potentially. 1
SecretPro Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 1 hour ago, UHDrive said: If he wants a move then slap a transfer request in. 28 yrs old in November is stupid business for anything over 30k + add ons. I could literally almost buy him myself.
ARM1968 Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 1 hour ago, Les-TA-Jon said: Are we actually in for him? I know we need more CBs and the old adage of 'only sign players good enough for the first 11' but if we did get him, does Evans drop to the bench? Surely not? Nah. Pretty obvious we’re going 3 at the back next season I think. So an extra CB is required. However big Tark’s does not impress me, has no resale value and is frankly about as underwhelming as signing Cattermole. 1
Legend_in_blue Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 6 minutes ago, ARM1968 said: Nah. Pretty obvious we’re going 3 at the back next season I think. So an extra CB is required. However big Tark’s does not impress me, has no resale value and is frankly about as underwhelming as signing Cattermole. Neither does a fridge we sold for 80 million. Unfortunately for us, a precedent has been set and we deal with it or walk away.
Dahnsouff Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 That link from Sky Sports stating Burnley wanting double (West Ham’s £27m bid) seems to be completely without basis, and just standard made up tosh. Relates I assume to the reported (but unverified) £50m buyout clause.
Pliskin Posted 7 September 2020 Posted 7 September 2020 Burnley have got to be carful though. There are certain attributes a club needs to command such a high price. Our stock has somewhat been over exaggerated thanks to our league win. So we are able to sell Maguire for £80m.... and he was also an England regular. Tarks isn’t, Burnley will not get £50m for him and I’d say it’s clear he wants to leave to take his game to the next level, so unless they’re willing to accept a more realistic price they will end up with a disgruntled player on their hands.
Recommended Posts