Popular Post urban.spaceman Posted 7 September 2020 Popular Post Share Posted 7 September 2020 30 minutes ago, AKCJ said: Why don't we offer Burnley £54m Thai Baht and hope they don't notice? £54m in Thai Baht is ฿2,243,133,779. Which, if you convert it back to pounds, is still £54m. I don't think we've thought this all the way through. 19 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKCJ Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 3 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said: £54m in Thai Baht is ฿2,243,133,779. Which, if you convert it back to pounds, is still £54m. I don't think we've thought this all the way through. Just ignore the pound sign that I didn't mean to include. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realist Guy In The Room Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 4 minutes ago, AKCJ said: Just ignore the pound sign that I didn't mean to include. In that case, bloody hilarious. Top banter right there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozartfox Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 To be totally fair to Burnley, 54M for Tarkowski makes much more sense that 80M for Slabhead. But - just like we had Manures pants down, I would hate us to have the same done to us again by Burnley. Sporting bent us over in recent years and our business since has been excellent. Move on Rudders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Miquel The Work Geordie Posted 7 September 2020 Popular Post Share Posted 7 September 2020 14 minutes ago, AjcW said: Did you see the starting line up the other night for the U21's? People who should be in that team aren't getting in until Boothroyd.... dies? nb: I know they won 6-0 but it was only Kosovo Incredible that we've got such a talented generation coming through and the people in charge of them at the two highest levels are bloody bib and cone men. 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKCJ Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 7 minutes ago, Realist Guy In The Room said: In that case, bloody hilarious. Top banter right there. thanks mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babylon Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 34 minutes ago, mozartfox said: To be totally fair to Burnley, 54M for Tarkowski makes much more sense that 80M for Slabhead. But - just like we had Manures pants down, I would hate us to have the same done to us again by Burnley. Sporting bent us over in recent years and our business since has been excellent. Move on Rudders. With two years left on his contract, they are deluded if they think they can get that. Next summer they'll be happy to get £20m for him. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col city fan Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 2 minutes ago, Babylon said: With two years left on his contract, they are deluded if they think they can get that. Next summer they'll be happy to get £20m for him. I’d push the boat out for Tarkowski He’s a very solid CB and would make a big difference to our team A CB pair of Caglar and Tarkowski would be fine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
honeybradger Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 1 minute ago, Babylon said: With two years left on his contract, they are deluded if they think they can get that. Next summer they'll be happy to get £20m for him. Tarkowski is their best player whereas when maguire left he was our 9th best player in our starting lineup. Unless they have a replacement that they know will be top quality lined up theyre probably happy to wait out his contract rather than get a measly 20 mil for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Power Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 Purse strings are very tight at Burnley. Dyche might almost want him to go if it means he can use the £30-35m to strengthen elsewhere - squad is threadbare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TommyK Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 If they don't sell him this year, they'll get less next. Another year older, only one year left on his contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post frany104 Posted 7 September 2020 Popular Post Share Posted 7 September 2020 20 minutes ago, honeybradger said: Tarkowski is their best player whereas when maguire left he was our 9th best player in our starting lineup. Unless they have a replacement that they know will be top quality lined up theyre probably happy to wait out his contract rather than get a measly 20 mil for him. No he wasn’t. He was probably our 4th best player. Stop with this rubbish about Maguire being no good. We got a great price for him but he’s a top player. 6 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric Flair Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 11 minutes ago, frany104 said: No he wasn’t. He was probably our 4th best player. Stop with this rubbish about Maguire being no good. We got a great price for him but he’s a top player. Not during 2018/19 he wasn't, had a very mediocre season. His 1st season with us he was superb though. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dahnsouff Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 https://boards.footymad.net/showthread.php?t=38265543&page=2 Anyone else starting to suspect this is pretty much done and we are waiting for Burnley to get their replacement finalised Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FOXSE Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 1 hour ago, AKCJ said: Just ignore the pound sign that I didn't mean to include. The amount is bhat-shit crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxesWalk Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 18 minutes ago, frany104 said: No he wasn’t. He was probably our 4th best player. Stop with this rubbish about Maguire being no good. We got a great price for him but he’s a top player. In that season he was the 4th best defender in our back 4, Chilwell marginally better but Evans and Ricardo obviously so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babylon Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 59 minutes ago, honeybradger said: Tarkowski is their best player whereas when maguire left he was our 9th best player in our starting lineup. Unless they have a replacement that they know will be top quality lined up theyre probably happy to wait out his contract rather than get a measly 20 mil for him. It’s Burnley, they aren’t going to want to lose him on a free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happy85 Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Nacho Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 7 minutes ago, happy85 said: Champions League Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UniFox21 Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 7 minutes ago, happy85 said: No chance a move to West Ham increases his England chances. Would be a sideways move at best Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post StanSP Posted 7 September 2020 Popular Post Share Posted 7 September 2020 Burnley to West Ham is a backwards move right now, isn't it? 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nettle Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 They'll double his wage? Can't be on that much at Burnley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Costock_Fox Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 1 hour ago, TommyK said: If they don't sell him this year, they'll get less next. Another year older, only one year left on his contract. Not necessarily, Castagne being an example. They accepted £18m last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LCFCJ Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 1 minute ago, StanSP said: Burnley to West Ham is a backwards move right now, isn't it? Maybe not backwards cause they’re both as shit as eachother. Definitely not forward tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicester_Loyal Posted 7 September 2020 Share Posted 7 September 2020 A move to the capital and he'll probably double his wages, can't really blame him. I imagine we'll be interested depending on the fee they realistically want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts