James Tarkowski

[ARM1968]

5 minutes ago, Legend_in_blue said:

Neither does a fridge we sold for 80 million.

 

Unfortunately for us, a precedent has been set and we deal with it or walk away.

Walk?  Fuch that. We get on our bike and peddle away fast. 

[NaijaFox]

Surely, we can probably get a likely better and younger player abroad than plunking down 50 mil on Tarkowski. 

[UHDrive]

1 hour ago, Leeds Fox said:

 

 

Edited 7 September 2020 by UHDrive

[UHDrive]

1 hour ago, Leeds Fox said:

If we can get him for 30k we’re laughing! 

And then he gets injured and is out for season?

[st albans fox]

1 minute ago, UHDrive said:

And then he gets injured and is out for season?

for 30 grand, it wouldn't matter …….

[UHDrive]

Just now, st albans fox said:

for 30 grand, it wouldn't matter …….

Oh crap, I messed that one up 🙈

[NasPb]

I'll pass on him for 50 million 

[Out Foxed]

57 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

Burnley have got to be carful though. There are certain attributes a club needs to command such a high price. Our stock has somewhat been over exaggerated thanks to our league win. So we are able to sell Maguire for £80m.... and he was also an England regular. Tarks isn’t, Burnley will not get £50m for him and I’d say it’s clear he wants to leave to take his game to the next level, so unless they’re willing to accept a more realistic price they will end up with a disgruntled player on their hands.

it's not just that, the fact we don't just let players leave has increased prices. so they want to do the same and set a precedent. 

[Bezzanator89]

Burnley seemed determined to do to us, what we do to the "Big 6". Swings and roundabouts. Only difference we seem to have actual European aspirations, whereas mid-table mediocrity seems to be Burnley's holy grail every season.

 

The likes of James Tarkowski will not want to settle for that for the rest of his career if he really wants to break into the England side more regularly.

[sphericalfox]

If we pay 50m for a CB, we can forget about any further perm transfers.

[StanSP]

1 minute ago, sphericalfox said:

If we pay 50m for a CB, we can forget about any further perm transfers.

Hamza has the perm covered. Don't need any more. 

[The People's Hero]

Our approach is at nowhere like £50mn or now will it approach that number.

 

 

[glebe_sydneyfox]

41 minutes ago, NasPb said:

I'll pass on him for 50 million 

This

We shouldn't be going near this transfer for anything over £30mil. Fofana is a much more sensible option for us.

[OhYesNdidi]

If they value him at £50m, you better be sure his agent will demand he be paid like one... you’re talking £100k really

[MPH]

27 minutes ago, Bezzanator89 said:

Burnley seemed determined to do to us, what we do to the "Big 6". Swings and roundabouts. Only difference we seem to have actual European aspirations, whereas mid-table mediocrity seems to be Burnley's holy grail every season.

 

The likes of James Tarkowski will not want to settle for that for the rest of his career if he really wants to break into the England side more regularly.

 

Covid-19 has changed things big time. There’s no doubt we accepted a reduced figure for Chilly than we could have got. So this statement only applies to last season...They are a below average sized club that generates below average income so they can reject big money but those assets will run down their contract and leave for little or no value and a club their size can’t afford to do that for long without landing themselves in a hole..

Edited 7 September 2020 by MPH

[hackneyfox]

4 hours ago, st albans fox said:

Apparently Brentford have a 20% sell on clause 

We don't know how much Brentford sold him for (the 20% is on the profit Burnley make).

[Heymister2015]

This guy regularly gets thrashed against the top teams! Fofana is the man to get. Already smocked cigars in the company of mbappe and Neymar. 

[lcfcbluearmy]

Rob tanner has just said on the radio he doesn’t think we are interested and as far as he knows we haven’t been in contact this summer

[Kevin Russell]

I’d like to see him at Citeh, but he’s don’t see us paying stupid money....next!!

[NasPb]

11 minutes ago, lcfcbluearmy said:

Rob tanner has just said on the radio he doesn’t think we are interested and as far as he knows we haven’t been in contact this summer

I'm fine with that 

[Nick]

2 minutes ago, NasPb said:

I'm fine with that 

 

 

Well, if you weren’t it’d surely have been written in CAPS.

[jmono84]

I can see a double deal for this guy and McNeil. Maybe around £50m and Burnley can fiddle the Tarkowski fee so Brentford get less from the transfer clause.

[Nick]

4 minutes ago, jmono84 said:

I can see a double deal for this guy and McNeil. Maybe around £50m and Burnley can fiddle the Tarkowski fee so Brentford get less from the transfer clause.

I reckon we will pay £35 million but not till deadline if there’s any truth in this whatsoever.

[stu]

27 minutes ago, lcfcbluearmy said:

Rob tanner has just said on the radio he doesn’t think we are interested and as far as he knows we haven’t been in contact this summer

@UpTheLeagueFox being used by the club as a smokescreen to push through another CB signing? Fofana maybe?

[Dahnsouff]

2 minutes ago, stu said:

@UpTheLeagueFox being used by the club as a smokescreen to push through another CB signing? Fofana maybe?

Maybe part of the the Clubs mole hunt and @UpTheLeagueFox has just been made