Perez or Iheanacho? Poll

[Dahnsouff]

Voted Ayoze, but after today’s game it was bloody close. 

[Dr The Singh]

I love these turd contests

[dayday]

37 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

Where is the neither option?

Who would you play instead?

[Dr The Singh]

Just now, dayday said:

Who would you play instead?

Amartey

[HighPeakFox]

9 minutes ago, Lambert09 said:

I’m surprised we’ve not seen it suggested but I actually would love to see under play there. He’s a menace and is quick and has a good finish. 
 

would be one way of bringing him into the team.

Agree

[goody2028]

Chuck Barnes up top instead 

[TJB-fox]

Everton centre halves will bully Perez all day long and let’s be fair, his finishing is really quite poor. I’m much happier with him just behind the striker. 

[HybridFox]

Depends on the game tbh. I'd be inclined to start Iheanacho against Everton though

[KingsX]

As a striker?

 

Nacho is toilet paper.  You hold your nose, it’s nothing you’d want to watch on action, but it’s designed (if crudely) for the task.

 

Perez is more of a bidet.  A lot classier, but dainty, and less effective.

 

I’m a TP guy.

Edited 24 January 2021 by KingsX

[Blue-fox]

Is there not a youth player/u23 striker we can put on the bench? Ian isn’t the answer unfortunately. 

[Steve_Guppy_Left_Foot]

This time last year ihenacho got a run in the team and did brilliantly. Kept being the player hauled off after an hour when he was motm. Confidence is clearly shot l to bits, I'd love him to rediscover that form but for whatever reason Brendan clearly doesn't fancy him and never has, shown by the fact he was nearly always the first hauled off when he did start, regardless of how he played. If that's the case which imo it clearly is there's no point him being here at all. Sell him and get someone in the manager trusts. I'd give him a run myself but it won't happen. 

[Hammo]

Perez is the better footballer, Iheanacho the better finisher. So it’s a toss up.

 

Both players have had the odd good game in a Leicester shirt but not nearly enough to warrant regular selection, and the fact this thread even exists proves that neither player has justified the big money we paid for them.

[winteriscoming]

Went for Perez. Not saying we are Man City but I think we could do what they do and play without a natural forward. Between Barnes, Under and Perez you could switch it around during matches. Also I still think Ricardo as an option wide could be considered when we play 3 forward players. 

[Lesterlad]

1 hour ago, Sharpe's Fox said:

So after seeing both starting up top in the past month who would you be starting?

Under

[Strokes]

30 minutes ago, goody2028 said:

Chuck Barnes up top instead 

Who do you play on the left side of attack then?

[Shane]

A bit off topic apologies, but if we sign a striker like Edouard in the summer, surely one of these will be leaving? Who would you prefer to leave, Perez or Iheanacho?

 

[Mark]

11 minutes ago, Strokes said:

Who do you play on the left side of attack then?

Ricardo did well the single time he played left wing for us, coincidentally away at Everton where he assisted the only goal.

Can't see Under getting any minutes again otherwise, as Ricardo is going to be picked to play right wing after Albrighton from what Rodgers said last week.

[Strokes]

1 minute ago, Mark said:

Ricardo did well the single time he played left wing for us, coincidentally away at Everton where he assisted the only goal.

Can't see Under getting any minutes again otherwise, as Ricardo is going to be picked to play right wing after Albrighton from what Rodgers said last week.

It could be interesting, I didn’t think of Ricardo. I reckon we’ll see Ayoze or Iheanacho though.

[South Shire Fox]

Rather Iheanacho personally. Looked really sharp when he had a spell in the side last season and with a run of games he’d rediscover that hopefully. 
 

Perez best role is coming on as a substitute for Maddison late on when we’re holding onto a lead. Hes proved a real asset in recent weeks with his close ball control winning us freekicks to take the pressure off. Him as a lone striker though.. meh. Far too lightweight and slow Imo.

[NaijaFox]

15 minutes ago, Mark said:

Ricardo did well the single time he played left wing for us, coincidentally away at Everton where he assisted the only goal.

Can't see Under getting any minutes again otherwise, as Ricardo is going to be picked to play right wing after Albrighton from what Rodgers said last week.

Ricardo will likely be bang average as a right winger.  Ünder is really a wing forward, and frankly a much better option.

[Marshall Cockney Fox]

If Madders had not under cooked three through balls in a row, Nacho might had stoked the 4th home and we'd be saying 'defintely Kel'. Whoever we pick needs the right service.

 

For me Ayoze comes way too deep and will get bullied up top by big defenders.

[Parafox]

Perez has the pace and speed of thought but no finish. Ian has no pace, no speed of thought but relies on the right ball to him and then has the finish. He's no JV and neither Perez nor Ian gives me any confidence in scoring goals. For me, move Barnes more forward/central and have balls through or crosses in from Tielemans, Albrighton and Under. 

[m4DD0gg]

Both utter garbage, if i had to choose it would be perez because he can at least control a football.

 

 

[Clever Fox]

Perez looked a little rusty today but still took up good positions. With a few training sessions and games He will come good.

Plus with him we have the added option of moving Barnes or Under into the center and Perez to the wing. Which in itself can confuse defenders.

 

[lgfualol]

Perez with Barnes and Ünder

Nacho with Barnes and Albrighton