Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

That's Nacho not starting then. 

 

"It’s great that he’s able to make an impact if he starts or coming off the bench. If you play with two strikers, it can affect the balance behind that. Jamie has got three in five games, Ade has scored, Harvey has scored, Youri has scored, the guys you want to be scoring are starting to.”

Posted
4 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

This will be a proper performance start to finish from the chaps.

 

3-0 Vardy, Barnes and Seniorman with the goals

 

 

Lets hope this doesn't go as poorly as your Maddison shout last week :D

  • Haha 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, turlo said:

That's Nacho not starting then. 

 

"It’s great that he’s able to make an impact if he starts or coming off the bench. If you play with two strikers, it can affect the balance behind that. Jamie has got three in five games, Ade has scored, Harvey has scored, Youri has scored, the guys you want to be scoring are starting to.”

And yet Barnes scored in Europe from an Iheanacho assist, Lookman from an Iheanacho assist in the Cup and Tielemans scored in a 4-1 pasting by West Ham. This has actually angered me, just needed him to namecheck Albrighton who also scored from an Iheanacho assist I think?

  • Like 1
Posted

It's a good time to play us..How many points has that Villarreal midfielder cost us I wonder...anyway it's brendans' job to make us look top 6 again so no time like the present 

Posted

 

26 minutes ago, turlo said:

That's Nacho not starting then. 

 

"It’s great that he’s able to make an impact if he starts or coming off the bench. If you play with two strikers, it can affect the balance behind that. Jamie has got three in five games, Ade has scored, Harvey has scored, Youri has scored, the guys you want to be scoring are starting to.”

Really don’t understand this bollocks he’s spouting. We’ve been playing a 4-2-3-1 with the ball and a 4-4-2 without the ball with Maddison playing that Number 10/Second striker role.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, TheStig said:

If Perez is available surely Rodgers is going to play him........

If he does, then Perez is hanging on to those negatives involving BR with someone or 'something' very embarrassing.

Posted
2 hours ago, st albans fox said:

JJ expected back into full training end October……… guess that means we may see him in the new year ….

Basically like signing a 30m player and the most versatile defender in the country.  

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
46 minutes ago, RowlattsFox said:

A big part of me thinks Perez and Maddison will start. And what's interesting is the fact Perez starting isn't the most annoying. 

If they do, then Rodgers is taking a huge gamble with their confidence. 

 

The single one thing City fans have always been 'good' at is singling out their own players. The crowd are just waiting for Perez and Madders heavy touch. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Finnegan said:

 

Yeah I was going to pick out this quote. 

 

What frustrates me no end is that a manager that's supposed to have studied and followed the principles of Total Football has such an entrenched view of roles. 

 

Iheanacho isn't just simply "a striker", he's a footballer with a basket of skills and attributes just like the rest of them. He can be deployed wherever he fits and clearly he fits well in the gap between Vardy and the midfield, the same gap is Maddison is getting played in. 

 

How can you watch the build up to Barnes goal against Napoli and minimise Iheanacho to just "a striker?" 

 

It's no wonder Iheanacho can never get a break if his manager just sees him so one dimensionally. 

I don’t think you’ve interpreted that correctly imo. The whole balance of the team does change when we play ian. Everyone seems to think he can play at cam because when he plays he likes to drop deep, but that’s just not the same. As much as he does like to drop deep, he’s also good at playing off the last defender, which is very different to Maddison, those two players are not interchangeable without changing the system. As much as madders is out of form, we can’t drop him for ian and expect everything else to be the same.

 

Its also frustrating that everyone then interprets this as Rodgers hates ian and doesnt understand how good he is. Rodgers is where he is for a reason, and we’re on foxestalk for a reason.

Edited by Dusty
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
57 minutes ago, pmcla26 said:

Kasper

 

Ricardo 

Cags

Vesty

Castagne

 

Ndidi 

Youri 

 

Perez

Iheanacho

Barnes 

 

Vardy 

 

Lookman, Maddison and Daka off of the bench if we're chasing the game. 

Pretty much the team i expect....but not Maddison off the bench if we are chasing!

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Dusty said:

I don’t think you’ve interpreted that correctly imo. The whole balance of the team does change when we play ian. Everyone seems to think he can play at cam because when he plays he likes to drop deep, but that’s just not the same. As much as he does like to drop deep, he’s also good at playing off the last defender, which is very different to Maddison, those two players are not interchangeable without changing the system. As much as madders is out of form, we can’t drop him for ian and expect everything else to be the same.

 

Its also frustrating that everyone then interprets this as Rodgers hates ian and doesnt understand how good he is. Rodgers is where he is for a reason, and we’re on foxestalk for a reason.

 

When Iheanacho plays with Vardy he drops immensely deep, he's even been known to drop as far as defensive midfield to offer for a pass. He absolutely is interchangeable with another player who considers themselves an attacking midfielder, he himself described himself as a 10 when we first signed him. 

 

The only thing he's not great at is defensive work rate but quite frankly Madders hasn't done much of that recently either. 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Dusty said:

I don’t think you’ve interpreted that correctly imo. The whole balance of the team does change when we play ian. Everyone seems to think he can play at cam because when he plays he likes to drop deep, but that’s just not the same. As much as he does like to drop deep, he’s also good at playing off the last defender, which is very different to Maddison, those two players are not interchangeable without changing the system. As much as madders is out of form, we can’t drop him for ian and expect everything else to be the same.

 

Its also frustrating that everyone then interprets this as Rodgers hates ian and doesnt understand how good he is. Rodgers is where he is for a reason, and we’re on foxestalk for a reason.

I interpreted it the same as @Finnegan and @Ric Flair in that he’s not going to start Kels who is a “fantastic player” but doesn’t (in Rodger’s eyes) “do enough” without the ball. Yes, he’s not a tracking back, closing down kind of guy naturally but he has and will do it. He’s also such a threat with the ball and continued to create goals from nothing for himself or create key chances for others with his assists or just the attention they need to give him. 
 

It annoys me a bit that Kane gets all this praise for being able to drop and link while Kels doesn’t. The only thing for him (which is good and bad, but more good) is that he can be a little greedy. He scored a worldie on Wed but could have given it to Daka on a plate (I think they joked about it afterwards, so no harm no foul), but his confidence in himself when he’s on makes him really potent and I think he deserves a start. 
 

I’m more worried about the other end of the pitch and how weak we look from crosses and set pieces. Cags is like a bull in a china shop at the moment. Westy seems a bit puny and Kasper can’t seem to pass to anyone nicely if anyone puts him under mere-ist bit of pressure. Burnley will lump crosses, bully and press even more than usual, and they’ll be desperate for the win 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, pmcla26 said:

Kasper

 

Ricardo 

Cags

Vesty

Castagne

 

Ndidi 

Youri 

 

Perez

Iheanacho

Barnes 

 

Vardy 

 

Lookman, Maddison and Daka off of the bench if we're chasing the game. 

Perez really???

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Finnegan said:

 

Yeah I was going to pick out this quote. 

 

What frustrates me no end is that a manager that's supposed to have studied and followed the principles of Total Football has such an entrenched view of roles. 

 

Iheanacho isn't just simply "a striker", he's a footballer with a basket of skills and attributes just like the rest of them. He can be deployed wherever he fits and clearly he fits well in the gap between Vardy and the midfield, the same gap is Maddison is getting played in. 

 

How can you watch the build up to Barnes goal against Napoli and minimise Iheanacho to just "a striker?" 

 

It's no wonder Iheanacho can never get a break if his manager just sees him so one dimensionally. 

Well said 👏 

Posted
1 hour ago, Paninistickers said:
3 hours ago, st albans fox said:

JJ expected back into full training end October……… guess that means we may see him in the new year ….

Basically like signing a 30m player and the most versatile defender in the country.

We won’t see him back to his previous levels until next season. Given how long he’s been out it will take half a season to get back up to speed, and we’ll be at the business end of the season so less chance to give him game time 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...