Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
davieG

Stephy Mavididi

By davieG, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
StriderHiryu

StriderHiryu

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

6M euros, you can take punts at that price. 
 

Finnegan’s analysis is great to see. In terms of the eye test he’s really rapid. Pep used wingers that were fast and skilful in terms of being able to beat a man one on one, and pose some kind of goal threat. Guardiola also managed to get Sterling to score tons of goals despite being a pretty poor finisher. The system creates chances, if we get a player with right characteristics, they should do alright. 
 

Based on that I’ll wait till game 5 till I write him off completely and start booing him. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 12
Finnegan

Finnegan

Posted
Posted
Just now, StriderHiryu said:

I’ll wait till game 5 till I write him off completely and start booing him.

we-dont-do-that-here-black-panther.gif

 

Five games is far too long, more like 2.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
ALC Fox

ALC Fox

Posted
Posted

Bringing back an English player brought up at a North London club's academy before going abroad to test himself and excelling on the continent?

 

This is clearly the beta test before we bring in Marcus Edwards in a year's time :D

  • Like 1
Finnegan

Finnegan

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, ALC Fox said:

Bringing back an English player brought up at a North London club's academy before going abroad to test himself and excelling on the continent?

 

This is clearly the beta test before we bring in Marcus Edwards in a year's time :D

 

That's another great name for comparison.

 

Interestingly, Mavididi has a better goal scoring rate of return in Ligue 1 than Marcus Edwards does in Liga NOS for a better club. 

 

  • Like 2
Stadt

Stadt

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Tuna said:

Right footed left winger or a striker? Or both?

He's a winger, definitely not a striker 

  • Thanks 2
KFS

KFS

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, StriderHiryu said:

DezMpJ5.png

 

I think I've cracked our high-tech scouting algorithm lads :ph34r:

It’s basically @Ric Flair ****ing about with Transfermarkt and coming on here to throw us off the scent after last time’s fiasco 

  • Haha 3
Guest Mickyblueeyes

Guest Mickyblueeyes

Posted
Posted

His figures look very good. It’s seems a good signing. Not that I heard of him before but why is there reluctance. 

Daggers

Daggers

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Finnegan said:

 

Statistically the end product is there. 

 

Looking at the three seasons he's been in Ligue 1 and comparing him to Barnes over the same time he has 0.32 goals per game vs 0.36 for Barnes. 

 

In that time Barnes created 0.12 expected goal assists per game vs Mavididi at 0.09.

 

Mavididi makes slightly fewer key passes a game but has a much better take-on success percentage and does a LOT more defensively. 

 

We could do a lot, lot worse really. Bit harsh to question his end product because of the way some twelve year old has edited his Media Studies project to focus more on the dribbling. 

 

 

inb4 Mavididi becomes your defining Flair moment lol

  • Haha 1
  • Popular Post
Finnegan

Finnegan

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
Just now, Daggers said:

 

inb4 Mavididi becomes your defining Flair moment lol

 

I mean, jokes aside, of course he could fail. Any transfer could. 

 

In @Ric Flair defence, I think Tete is a terrific talent and I'm fairly confident he'll go on to have a great career in Europe's top five leagues. He'll be back playing Champions/Europa League football long before us I imagine.

 

In the two seasons that Tete has been out of Ukraine he's played almost identical number of 90 minutes as Mavididi and has 0.48 goals per game to Mavididi's 0.3 and 0.21 assists per game to Mavididi's 0.13.

 

Tete was great on paper and Ric was right to be excited. We don't know why he flopped, realistically there's a good chance he just didn't have time to come in and get settled and get used to the league and club with such a poor man manager in a desperate situation and the morale of the squad in pieces. Or maybe it's more than that, maybe his languid style and smaller frame just aren't cut out for the Prem. 

 

Stephy is definitely far more athletic, he's taller, he's stronger, he's also a local lad born and raised in the Midlands. All of those things could help, as could him playing at a lower level. 

 

We'll see. I'm absolutely not spaffing myself telling everyone he's mustard! But I do think he's a very good find for a Championship team and some of the cynicism is undue. 

 

  • Like 10
mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Lcfc-1992 said:

New number 7?

I reckon 10.  

Ric Flair

Ric Flair

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

 

I mean, jokes aside, of course he could fail. Any transfer could. 

 

In @Ric Flair defence, I think Tete is a terrific talent and I'm fairly confident he'll go on to have a great career in Europe's top five leagues. He'll be back playing Champions/Europa League football long before us I imagine.

 

In the two seasons that Tete has been out of Ukraine he's played almost identical number of 90 minutes as Mavididi and has 0.48 goals per game to Mavididi's 0.3 and 0.21 assists per game to Mavididi's 0.13.

 

Tete was great on paper and Ric was right to be excited. We don't know why he flopped, realistically there's a good chance he just didn't have time to come in and get settled and get used to the league and club with such a poor man manager in a desperate situation and the morale of the squad in pieces. Or maybe it's more than that, maybe his languid style and smaller frame just aren't cut out for the Prem. 

 

Stephy is definitely far more athletic, he's taller, he's stronger, he's also a local lad born and raised in the Midlands. All of those things could help, as could him playing at a lower level. 

 

We'll see. I'm absolutely not spaffing myself telling everyone he's mustard! But I do think he's a very good find for a Championship team and some of the cynicism is undue. 

 

Love you pal

  • Haha 1
trugerkem

trugerkem

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Mickyblueeyes said:

His figures look very good. It’s seems a good signing. Not that I heard of him before but why is there reluctance. 

Because Daka’s figures looked good before we signed him as well 

Jimbo

Jimbo

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, trugerkem said:

Because Daka’s figures looked good before we signed him as well 

But Mahrez no one had ever heard of....

 

Vardys figures were good, but in non league

 

Amartey looked like he would be a good signing

 

Youri Tielemans was a bit trash before he came here

 

Albrighton wasn't good enough for the premier league

 

Ayoze Perez was one of Newcastle's stand out performers

 

Fuchs arrived as a deadball specialist

 

Point is, you never really know what you're going to get when any transfer goes through. There are numerous different, human factors to squeeze into the equation. 

 

This lads figures could be good or could be bad but I don't, and I suspect you don't know either, the style of Montpelier's play, what the manager asks of him, how well he gets in with his team mates, generally how happy he is in his surroundings etc etc etc

 

Some work out, some don't. For £6m I don't see this as much of a risk. Our only problem is if we don't bring someone else in, if he's coming as a starter and then he's trash, we're in a pickle as we've no one to replace him 

  • Like 2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...