Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Bluearmyfox28 said:

The answer always appears so obvious and realistic yet somehow they get it so wrong baring Enzo. 

Our recent appointments have been dreadful apart from Enzo. 
Even under Enzo it was a bore fest to watch. 
It will be more down to luck than good judgement who we end up with next imo. 

Edited by winteriscoming
  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, winteriscoming said:

Our recent appointments have been dreadful apart from Enzo. 
Even under Enzo it was a bore fest to watch. 
It will be more down to luck than good judgement who we end up with next imo. 

I do disagree about the bore fest under Enzo, you can’t help how the opposition sets up against you week in week out. But that’s a conversation for another day lol 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Bluearmyfox28 said:

I do disagree about the bore fest under Enzo, you can’t help how the opposition sets up against you week in week out. But that’s a conversation for another day lol 

You’re right it is a conversation for another day. 
I’ll just agree to disagree with you. 😂

  • Haha 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, GLC said:

Interesting, I hear Martin had additional talks over the weekend and is looking more and more likely to be the manager

Ughhh, you’re the one who knows about the kits next year too right? :( 

  • Like 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, GLC said:

Interesting, I hear Martin had additional talks over the weekend and is looking more and more likely to be the manager

You v @Ric Flair on this one. 
 

sure Ric said he’d heard we hadn’t even spoke to him 👀 we all hope it’s the latter of course. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Nolucklcfc said:

You v @Ric Flair on this one. 
 

sure Ric said he’d heard we hadn’t even spoke to him 👀 we all hope it’s the latter of course. 

Happy to be wrong, just sharing what I’d been told. 
said in the original post that the guy was 50/50 on info. But he’s been on the money the last 2 times. 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, GLC said:

Happy to be wrong, just sharing what I’d been told. 
said in the original post that the guy was 50/50 on info. But he’s been on the money the last 2 times. 

I hope he’s terrible for info haha. 

Posted
2 hours ago, The Ipswich said:

We've heard it's David Wagner. I work for a well-known sports broadcaster and Wagner fits because a) Out of Work so no compensation and b) Did a good job at Huddersfield and Norwich working on a shoestring budget.

Top and Rudkin currently having a hart to hart to decide on this oneimages(4).jpeg.79c227e4d80c0f740bb09a3a3e484297.jpeg

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, GLC said:

Happy to be wrong, just sharing what I’d been told. 
said in the original post that the guy was 50/50 on info. But he’s been on the money the last 2 times. 

I remain sceptical. Martin would be an absolutely terrible choice for so many reasons—it’s almost impossible to identify a logical thought process that would lead to him being appointed. Having been plunged down two divisions by our defensive abjectness, are we really about to appoint somebody who is famous for his inability to coach a defence? At a time when the club’s relationship with the fans is at an all-time low, are they really going to make an appointment they know will make things even worse? Left to their own devices, I suppose Top and Rudkin might just make a decision as bad as this—hopefully our new Sporting Director and CEO will steer us away from it.

 

 

 

 

Edited by ClaphamFox
  • Like 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, ClaphamFox said:

I remain sceptical. Martin would be an absolutely terrible choice for so many reasons—it’s almost impossible to identify logical thought process that would lead to him being appointed. Having been plunged down two divisions by our defensive abjectness, are we really about to appoint somebody who is famous for his inability to coach a defence? At a time when the club’s relationship with the fans is at an all-time low, are they really going to make an appointment they know will make things even worse? Left to their own devices, I suppose Top and Rudkin might just make a decision as bad as this—hopefully our new Sporting Director and CEO will steer us away from it.

 

 

 

 

I've come to the conclusion that Foxestalk is completely out of step and our fanbase will think that Martin will be great for us, cos' Top says so.

Posted
26 minutes ago, ClaphamFox said:

Left to their own devices, I suppose Top and Rudkin might just make a decision as bad as this—hopefully our new Sporting Director and CEO will steer us away from it.

I think this is the key, there isn't a doubt in my mind that Top and Rudkin will want him and will of spoken to him.

 

It could just be lazy links, I was told similar to GLC, I have a family member who works around the Forest Academy who told me, so its definitely not a concrete link that you would put a bet on. But I guess no smoke without fire etc.

 

But yes, if it is true and we are genuinely in advanced talks with him, then it certainly would tell me that the new director is just the fall guy and they are doing what they want. I would find it hard to believe a new Director coming in would pick Martin as the number 1 choice, but like I say you'd bet your house, if left to their own devices Top and Rudkin will be trying to sell him the dream. I actually think Martin will go abroad and turn us down if the rumours of him being spoken to are true. But I guess we just strap ourselves in and hope its either nonsense or nothing more than hes applied and by default under consideration.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...