Stadt Posted 3 January 2016 Posted 3 January 2016 I don't really know a lot about him but his name is cool as fùck so we should sign him
davieG Posted 4 January 2016 Posted 4 January 2016 Leicester City are to pull out of their ambitious bid for Dynamo Kiev defender Aleksandar Dragovic after the Ukraine club changed the asking price. Claudio Ranieri concluded the £3.75million transfer of Demarai Gray from Birmingham on Monday and had signalled a £12m plus add-ons offer for Dragovic. However, Kiev, who are developing a reputation for being difficult to deal with, have raised their price from £16m to £25m. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3384546/Leicester-set-pull-deal-Dynamo-Kiev-defender-Aleksandar-Dragovic-Ukrainian-club-raise-asking-price-25m.html#ixzz3wJobHEJC Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Legend fox Posted 4 January 2016 Posted 4 January 2016 I think that means 16m up front or X amount plus add ins over 20m. They must be skint.
Bayfox Posted 4 January 2016 Posted 4 January 2016 So we offered 12 up front raising to 16 and they decide they want 25. OK we go to 12.5 and they can have the rest when he captains us to champions league glory. Deal
mozartfox Posted 5 January 2016 Posted 5 January 2016 They need to pay Putin's Gas Bill. May be best to move on or get Anderson Perry on the case? Not worth 25m Euros.
ealingfox Posted 5 January 2016 Posted 5 January 2016 Who do these tinpot clubs from the arse end of nowhere think they are eh?
mozartfox Posted 5 January 2016 Posted 5 January 2016 Who do these tinpot clubs from the arse end of nowhere think they are eh? Everton?
Giggsy77 Posted 7 January 2016 Posted 7 January 2016 @AFCPressWatch #LCFC made an increased £16M bid for Dynamo Kiev defender Aleksandar Dragovic but the Ukrainian club rejected it & are holding out for £20M.
Tuna Posted 7 January 2016 Posted 7 January 2016 @AFCPressWatch #LCFC made an increased £16M bid for Dynamo Kiev defender Aleksandar Dragovic but the Ukrainian club rejected it & are holding out for £20M. Just pay the extra 4 million for fuchs sake, its pocket money for premier league teams.
Jaspa Posted 7 January 2016 Posted 7 January 2016 Just pay the extra 4 million for fuchs sake, its pocket money for premier league teams. Probably doesnt work like that. If we go in too eager they'd be holding out for 25mil the next minute and would reject our 15-20m. We need to put pressure on them by keeping our options open because in reality we're in no rush to buy until we possibly let Benny go and even then we've not lost a current starter. Money is still money and we cant be had for mugs once as everyone will try to
Ozwin Posted 7 January 2016 Posted 7 January 2016 It won't be £20M up front anyway. But Spaztic is right, you don't rush these things like you're playing FM.
Vardinio'sCat Posted 7 January 2016 Posted 7 January 2016 If we are prepared to pay £16 million for a CB, what are we prepared to pay for a striker? Defies belief really...
GaelicFox Posted 7 January 2016 Posted 7 January 2016 If we are prepared to pay £16 million for a CB, what are we prepared to pay for a striker? Defies belief really... 40-45m I hope , we are in the big time now baby ! All 20 premier league clubs will be in the 30 richest clubs in Europe in 2016/17
weller54 Posted 7 January 2016 Posted 7 January 2016 40-45m I hope , we are in the big time now baby ! All 20 premier league clubs will be in the 30 richest clubs in Europe in 2016/17 Bournemouth will be able to go to B&Q and upgrade their sheds...
les-tah Posted 7 January 2016 Posted 7 January 2016 Bournemouth will be able to go to B&Q and upgrade their sheds... you leave Bournemouths 9000 fans alone.
MC Prussian Posted 7 January 2016 Posted 7 January 2016 Bournemouth will be able to go to B&Q and upgrade their sheds... If they stay in the Premier League. If not, it'll be enough for one half of it.
Bluearmyfox28 Posted 7 January 2016 Posted 7 January 2016 Is AFCPressWatch reliable? Never heard of the account.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.