HoustonFox Posted 10 February 2018 Posted 10 February 2018 I’m cheering Riyad. Eff all of you that ain’t
Tom12345 Posted 10 February 2018 Posted 10 February 2018 Wtf? Now he takes Diabete. He was playing well. 1
ARTY_FOX Posted 10 February 2018 Posted 10 February 2018 Mahrez and iheanacho to both score. Mahrez to Finnish the game on a hat trick
JamesfromlondonLCFC Posted 10 February 2018 Posted 10 February 2018 i seriously dont get why we bought silva off for for simpson... and certainly not in place of james. mind-blowing 1 1
MC Prussian Posted 10 February 2018 Posted 10 February 2018 Mahrez... Interesting. Not that it'll have much influence on the way this game is going.
Heart-Shaped Fox Posted 10 February 2018 Posted 10 February 2018 Should have taken off Fuchs. We're chasing the game and Chillwell is much more attacking
foxes_rule1978 Posted 10 February 2018 Posted 10 February 2018 Just now, kingfox said: If it ain't broke, don't fix it. 1-1 and he makes an unnecessary change, stupid. I don’t know what the change was for, we didn’t look troubled in that first half 1
Wasyls Pec Deck Posted 10 February 2018 Posted 10 February 2018 Haha those 2 subs perhaps an acknowledgement his change at half time has gone tits up 1
funkyrobot Posted 10 February 2018 Posted 10 February 2018 I swear the grass is long. The ball isn’t rolling well and earlier on they got caught out with Sterling and not to mention Kasper’s fkin kicking.
biggs Posted 10 February 2018 Posted 10 February 2018 Should be better now...hopefully both will prove a point
EnglishOxide Posted 10 February 2018 Posted 10 February 2018 1 minute ago, kingfox said: If it ain't broke, don't fix it. 1-1 and he makes an unnecessary change, stupid. He's not responsible for a collection of mistakes at the back. Defence were sleeping, simple as.
limeydale Posted 10 February 2018 Posted 10 February 2018 If Mahrez don't win this for us ...I don't wanna hear another peep from the Algerians.
SheppyFox Posted 10 February 2018 Posted 10 February 2018 I’m a big supporter of Puel, but taking off Silva was full borat mode. 1
The Doctor Posted 10 February 2018 Posted 10 February 2018 1 minute ago, foxes_rule1978 said: I don’t know what the change was for, we didn’t look troubled in that first half Well no, but for dragovics goalline block and schmeichel we'd have gone in behind. We were defending well but they were causing problems
Tuna Posted 10 February 2018 Author Posted 10 February 2018 1 minute ago, SheppyFox said: I’m a big supporter of Puel, but taking off Silva was full borat mode. Can only assume it was an injury. Defies logic otherwise. 1
kingfox Posted 10 February 2018 Posted 10 February 2018 1 minute ago, foxes_rule1978 said: I don’t know what the change was for, we didn’t look troubled in that first half There was no need for it was there, we were looking decent. If it's an injury then I'll hold my hands up, a straight up tactical change then Puel has had a mare. 2 minutes ago, EnglishOxide said: He's not responsible for a collection of mistakes at the back. Defence were sleeping, simple as. There was no need to change it though, changes the right side, three mins in we concede down the right side. 1
Suzie the Fox Posted 10 February 2018 Posted 10 February 2018 Just now, SheppyFox said: I’m a big supporter of Puel, but taking off Silva was full borat mode. We switched tactics. (dunno why though as we we had started to grow into the game)
Recommended Posts