Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
FrankieADZ

Craig Dawson

By FrankieADZ, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

coolhandfox

coolhandfox

Posted
Posted
Just now, Ric Flair said:

The positives are he won't be on £100k a week and in the past ge has proven he can play in a back four. Coady is on £100k a week and can't play in a back four.

 

If this is a 18 month deal then we could be better off.

That's my take, he could cost us less. 

 

We could also get a small fee as you could argue Coady is younger so worth more. 

  • Popular Post
ClaphamFox

ClaphamFox

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
2 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

The positives are he won't be on £100k a week and in the past ge has proven he can play in a back four. Coady is on £100k a week and can't play in a back four.

 

If this is a 18 month deal then we could be better off.

image.jpeg.806081162a73e1b0b75dbaee712ab82b.jpeg

  • Haha 5
filbertway

filbertway

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Ric Flair said:

The positives are he won't be on £100k a week and in the past ge has proven he can play in a back four. Coady is on £100k a week and can't play in a back four.

 

If this is a 18 month deal then we could be better off.

Gonna cover at least 5-10% of the Skipp fee. 

 

I've got every faith that we still manage to come out of this worse off. Whilst wasting the day doing a bit of business which will be completely inconsequential.

  • Haha 2
AKCJ

AKCJ

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

The positives are he won't be on £100k a week and in the past ge has proven he can play in a back four. Coady is on £100k a week and can't play in a back four.

 

If this is a 18 month deal then we could be better off.

The negatives are that we'll give Dawson 100k a week and a 3 year deal.

  • Haha 3
StanSP

StanSP

Posted
Posted
Just now, dylanlegend said:

Dawson is actually decent and it gets Coady off the books. 

 

Who is everyone expecting we sign? Maldini? 

I'd take a current Maldini over any of our defenders right now to be fair. 

urban fox

urban fox

Posted
Posted

Just remember when we signed a certain CB in January who couldn't even get into stokes side.

Not saying he is in the same class as Huth, but he is not bad.

adam

adam

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, dylanlegend said:

Dawson is actually decent and it gets Coady off the books. 

 

Who is everyone expecting we sign? Maldini? 

He isn't decent though is he. All the wolves fans say the same.  His legs have gone. He will be no better than the two idiots who are playing for us now.

  • Like 1
Mickyblueeyes

Mickyblueeyes

Posted
Posted

I've missed having a proper defender at the back. We probably havent had one since Fofana left. Evans was injured and Soyuncu an outcast. We've seen in recent times, Amartey, Vestegaard, Faes, Coady and Okoli. Each one has pissed me off multiple times. They have no standards. 

 

Dawson has two things against him - he isnt assured on the ball and his age. But he is a proper defender. Our standards in that area have dropped significantly. 

 

If he has got 6 months left in him, honestly and if we do use him properly, he could be a a very shrewd and lucky signing. 

HankMarvin

HankMarvin

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Ric Flair said:

The positives are he won't be on £100k a week and in the past ge has proven he can play in a back four. Coady is on £100k a week and can't play in a back four.

 

If this is a 18 month deal then we could be better off.

If he is on that kind of money, it’s not really of any benefit to move.

18 months 100k at our spa facilities and he gets to leave as a free and maybe get a juicy contract in America or Saudi at 34.

Can’t see wolves paying more than 50k a week for someone that’s played 1400 mins in 2 seasons with one of those seasons in the tier below.

 

SouthStandUpperTier

SouthStandUpperTier

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, urban fox said:

Just remember when we signed a certain CB in January who couldn't even get into stokes side.

Not saying he is in the same class as Huth, but he is not bad.

I also remember we signed Molla Wagué and Ryan Bennett in Jan too?

 

To me this seems like we are simply trying to dump Coady's contract on Wolves, and taking Dawson is the price we have to pay to do so.

volpeazzurro

volpeazzurro

Posted
Posted

Both Coady and Dawson now are way below the standard we need! We arguably need rid of Coady and Faes. Keep Okoli and Vestergaard plus one new signing with Nelson coming back from injury next season. Nelson couldn't have done worse than the current clowns.

CosbehFox

CosbehFox

Posted
Posted
55 minutes ago, The Bear said:

He's not shit you just had no idea how to use him properly. He's no Van Dijk but he's a very solid sweeper defender and reader of the game. 

 

Trust me, every Wolves fan will be delighted to see him back. He would never have left in the first place but for that ***** Lage getting rid of him because he was too outspoken in the dressing room. 

 

He'll fit what we're trying to do with a back three more than Dawson does now. Dawson will probably fit what you're trying to do defensively too so it makes sense from a footballing perspective. Dawson's age is an issue but it could easily work out. He was probably our best defender last season. 

He’s rubbish, the end. He’s had his good days and now he’s utter pants. See Everton too 

BlueApple

BlueApple

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Mickyblueeyes said:

I've missed having a proper defender at the back. We probably havent had one since Fofana left. Evans was injured and Soyuncu an outcast. We've seen in recent times, Amartey, Vestegaard, Faes, Coady and Okoli. Each one has pissed me off multiple times. They have no standards. 

 

Dawson has two things against him - he isnt assured on the ball and his age. But he is a proper defender. Our standards in that area have dropped significantly. 

 

If he has got 6 months left in him, honestly and if we do use him properly, he could be a a very shrewd and lucky signing. 

 

What use is a "proper defender" who will be 35 by the end of the season and can't string a pass together and these standards you're talking about, Wolves have conceded 52 goals this season, only one less than us.

It's another Ayew, almost every fan can see that it's a pointless signing who won't improve the squad but the club go through with it anyway. 

  • Like 1
Claridge

Claridge

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, adam said:

He isn't decent though is he. All the wolves fans say the same.  His legs have gone. He will be no better than the two idiots who are playing for us now.

He has legs so he must be better

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...