Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, CosbehFox said:

At left back? We don't have an outstanding prospect there within the youth ranks. Just Luke chuffing Thomas. 

Agree with you.

 

But the suspicion with this club is that he will be a shoe in and we will 'have' to play experienced heads in other areas as the team is too inexperienced.

 

It seems to be a continual theme for the club. Experienced players are allowed to fail over and over again, our own young players are not afforded the same opprtunties.

 

A young player comes in from a large club and they get 30 appearances.

Edited by kenny
Posted
1 minute ago, kenny said:

our own young players are not afforded the same opprtunties.

How much have Thomas and Nelson played? Stolarczyk too? 

Posted
Just now, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Not going to pretend to know anything about him but hopefully he's this L1 tour's Kerrea Gilbert.

Pretty much the same when we're last in league one, we didn't know what to expect from Lloyd Dyer, Max Gradel or even Tom Cleverley. 

  • Like 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, TheGoldenGod said:

Thats the thing, I got the impression Mukasa was a talented lad with not the right attitude that knew he was returning to the glorious Man City after...hopefully this lad has a better temperament and tries to prove himself!

I think it is very difficult to assess the attitude of loanees over the last couple seasons. He started very well from what I recall and imo got sucked into the toxic cesspit our club had become. Hard to imagine anyone thriving at a club that was imploding at pace.

Posted
2 minutes ago, StanSP said:

How much have Thomas and Nelson played? Stolarczyk too? 

I don't class those as 'youth' any more.

 

Stol - 25 years and 95 senior apps.

Thomas - 25 years and 180 senior apps.

Nelson - 22 years and 83 senior apps.

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, FLAN said:

Mukasa was probably shocked by the sheer lack of professionalism and wanted out after a few weeks. Who could blame him 

A player with the right attitude would still put in good performances, just like JJ did!

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, StanSP said:

Playing Style: Noted as an “explosive pace” fullback with “strong defensive capability”, according to Manchester City F.C'

That's interesting to hear. For the way the gaffer plays, you'd want someone with these characteristics:

 

- Good on the ball so they can get involved in the build-up as they will often join the attack as we dominate the ball. Like JJ under Enzo. 

- Be an attacking outlet that can overlap or underlap a winger to join the attack, think of Kerkez when he was at Bournemouth.

- Be fast so that they can help out when we lose the ball on transition, like Djed Spence at the World Cup. 

 

My understanding was that he was one of those "not quite good enough to be a winger so converted to full back" types, so hearing he's good defensively is a real bonus. If you think of Luke Thomas, I don't think he's good at any of the three above sadly. 

  • Like 3
Posted

Shouldn’t be too hard for him to get in ahead of Thomas

 

If he plays well and we go up we could probably get him on loan again for the season after as well

Posted
27 minutes ago, StanSP said:

Who's the youth competing for LB? 

Mirsad Ali, but judging from the Cadíz game he's still a ways off being first team ready so maybe needs a L2/NL loan

Posted

I'm surprised at some negativity, we've got 50/60 games to play this season and we only had one left footed full back, I imagine the playing time will be shared with Luke Thomas, I think it's a good signing personally! He's got a little bit of experience playing mens football as well, which is good.

  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...