Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
ScouseFox

Sir Alex

By ScouseFox, in General Football and Sport

Recommended Posts

whoareyaaa

whoareyaaa

Posted
Posted

Rubbish. Not as good in the tackle or range of passing.

 

Lamapard owes half his goals to Makelele.

 

He is a better tackler yes but Lampard is the more intelligent player and the better all round player with his only downfall being his tackling.

 

Lampard’s career statistics are mind-boggling: 800 appearances, 241 goals and 124 assists.

Compare this with Steven Gerrard's 159 goals and 100 assists in 629 appearances, and with Xavi's 84 goals and 89 assists in 733 appearances.

Hugo Sanchez

Hugo Sanchez

Posted
Posted

Wait how old is Ramsey and how old is Gerrard ? Gerrard struggle with injuries just like Ramsey has, when he was younger. Say arsenal win the league and champions league this season ? Will that prove my point ?

Uncle Albert

Uncle Albert

Posted
Posted

I can end the debate right now, by the time Steven Gerrard was 21 he had already won the League Cup, the FA Cup and the UEFA Cup, Ramsey has won 0, now please Hugo quit with the bollocks.

kingfox

kingfox

Posted
Posted

Hopefully there's a chapter specifically about Mads Timm, now he is a player who is better than Gerrard and Ramsey put together.

 

 19743_300_1000_0_0_1152_1728.jpg

Aus Fox

Aus Fox

Posted
Posted

Gerrard, Lampard, Ramsey in that order. Ramsey is looking good at the minute but has got a long long way to go in his career before he can be mentioned in the same sentence as Gerrard and Lampard.

The big difference between Gerrard and Lampard is the big games throughout their careers in the big games Gerrard takes it to new levels of brilliance. He digs in and single handedly wins games. I can't recall a game where Lampard has done this

If you switch the players clubs could you see Lampard winning the champions league that night in Istanbul not to mention a few of the earlier rounds.

Guesty

Guesty

Posted
Posted

Since he's dishing the dirt on everyone I hope other people let his secrets out of the bag (if he's got any).

 

Seem's a bit petty and like he's selling some of his integrity for a quick buck - he might not even be writing a book if it wasn't for the players he's slagging off.

marko

marko

Posted
Posted

He is a better tackler yes but Lampard is the more intelligent player and the better all round player with his only downfall being his tackling.

 

Lampard’s career statistics are mind-boggling: 800 appearances, 241 goals and 124 assists.

Compare this with Steven Gerrard's 159 goals and 100 assists in 629 appearances, and with Xavi's 84 goals and 89 assists in 733 appearances.

 

So Lampard's better than Xavi as well? 

 

If Lampard had to get through as much work as Gerrard he wouldn't have scored that many. He had carte blanche to get forward without having to worry about tracking back anywhere near as much as Gerrard. On the assists stat, Gerrard has a superior assists to games ratio and I dare say this would be even higher if he had had the quality of striker in front of him that Lampard has done during his Chelsea career.

 

It's obviously a subjective matter, but for me Gerrard is the superior passer in both short pass and long pass, as well as the speed of the pass. I often think Lampard isn't as good at retaining the ball and plays a few terrible passes.

 

Lampard certainly can't haul a team up from the floor like Gerrard. There are countless matches that Gerrard has pretty much won Liverpool the match single-handedly with his tenacity and drive. I genuinely can't recall Lampard doing this.

Bert

Bert

Posted
Posted

He is spot on about Gerrard though, if Gerrard was from Chile nobody would rave about him. He's shit. Utterly shit, I'd honestly say I'd rather have Scot Parker on his day.

Well he's not utterly shit is he. Junior Lewis was utterly shit.
Kitchandro

Kitchandro

Posted
Posted

He is spot on about Gerrard though, if Gerrard was from Chile nobody would rave about him. He's shit. Utterly shit, I'd honestly say I'd rather have Scot Parker on his day.

 

lol

Uncle Albert

Uncle Albert

Posted
Posted

He is spot on about Gerrard though, if Gerrard was from Chile nobody would rave about him. He's shit. Utterly shit, I'd honestly say I'd rather have Scot Parker on his day.

 

FML.

 

Which two idiots decided to have sex and produce you? Seriously, I want to meet them and slap the male in the face.

Bert

Bert

Posted
Posted

Haha.

Love a good old autobiography so I've pre-ordered this from Amazon for £11.25.

Corky

Corky

Posted
Posted

He is spot on about Gerrard though, if Gerrard was from Chile nobody would rave about him. He's shit. Utterly shit, I'd honestly say I'd rather have Scot Parker on his day.

 

Scott Parker can't pass forward.

DennisNedry

DennisNedry

Posted
Posted

I don't think you can use trophies a player has won when deciding how good they are. That depends on the team they are in.

 

On Ferguson, he's a fantastic manager but he's a cvnt, I thought everybody already knew that.

Mark_w

Mark_w

Posted
Posted

He is spot on about Gerrard though, if Gerrard was from Chile nobody would rave about him. He's shit. Utterly shit, I'd honestly say I'd rather have Scot Parker on his day.

 

Are you trying to be Kingfox?

I don't understand. :blink:

foxfanazer

foxfanazer

Posted
Posted

Some absolute shite being spoken on here tonight lol

Gerrard has never been a top player? Have a word with yourselves. Just cuz Fergie was a great manager doesn't mean everything he says is right

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...