Rusko187 Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 15 minutes ago, Manwell Pablo said: Yeah that's what I think they'll say. I think he's made his decision to go in and by the time it would of become obvious to him that he was off balance he was well past the point of no return so a none argument for me but sure that's what they'll say. Either that or they will just say it's two feet which I guess it is in fairness to them but blatantly not intentional Do we know if we are going for an appeal yet? Surely got to be at least worth a go. Yes read this morning we will appeal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingcarr21 Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 19 minutes ago, Manwell Pablo said: Yeah that's what I think they'll say. I think he's made his decision to go in and by the time it would of become obvious to him that he was off balance he was well past the point of no return so a none argument for me but sure that's what they'll say. Either that or they will just say it's two feet which I guess it is in fairness to them but blatantly not intentional Do we know if we are going for an appeal yet? Surely got to be at least worth a go. Foxes to contest Vardy red card BBC Radio Leicester Posted at9:39 Leicester City are to appeal against the red card shown to striker Jamie Vardy in Saturday's 2-2 draw with Stoke City. We also understand the Football Association are likely to seek comments from both clubs regarding alleged coin-throwing by fans at the game on Saturday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st albans fox Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 21 minutes ago, kingcarr21 said: To me their argument is daft. How do you pull out of the challenge if you aren't in control? To me that makes no sense. My fear is the FA will do all they can to not rescind the card just to save Pawson. Out of control means you cannot change where you are headed because you are in mid air. They will argue that he could have avoided making the tackle by pulling his legs in towards him. It's a tough arguement to make but they don't really have to prove anything - we do! Vardy could argue that making himself into a 'ball' by tucking his legs in could have been even more dangerous to the opponent. Still think they will protect pawson by rejecting any appeal. Much easier to reject the appeal than accept it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingcarr21 Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 1 minute ago, st albans fox said: Out of control means you cannot change where you are headed because you are in mid air. They will argue that he could have avoided making the tackle by pulling his legs in towards him. It's a tough arguement to make but they don't really have to prove anything - we do! Vardy could argue that making himself into a 'ball' by tucking his legs in could have been even more dangerous to the opponent. Still think they will protect pawson by rejecting any appeal. Much easier to reject the appeal than accept it. I will be surprised if we win the appeal. Its the right decision but we wont get it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vocey Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 Can't see us winning the appeal...you can see why the ref has given it (doesn't mean it's correct decision) but makes it almost impossible to overturn. Will the ban increase if we have an unsuccessful appeal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poxyfoxy Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 It'll get rescinded Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manwell Pablo Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 1 minute ago, Vocey said: Can't see us winning the appeal...you can see why the ref has given it (doesn't mean it's correct decision) but makes it almost impossible to overturn. Will the ban increase if we have an unsuccessful appeal? It shouldn't do, as much as you can see why he gave it you can see why he perhaps shouldn't. They tend to increase bans if you take the piss we clearly have grounds to question this decision at the very least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vocey Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 15 minutes ago, Manwell Pablo said: It shouldn't do, as much as you can see why he gave it you can see why he perhaps shouldn't. They tend to increase bans if you take the piss we clearly have grounds to question this decision at the very least. Agree on both points there. Here's hoping anyway, would be nice to have Vardy up against Williams and Jagielka on boxing day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Costock_Fox Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 If it doesn't get overturned it will be a complete farce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davieG Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 Do they give reasons why an appeal has failed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Costock_Fox Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 If anyone watched that Sky program with Kammy and Ben Shepperd they slowed it down and GJ pushes Vardy that causes Vardy to kick his standing leg, he trips over and that is clearly the reason both feet are off the ground. Guessing this is the way we portray it in the appeal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filbertway Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 2 minutes ago, Costock_Fox said: If anyone watched that Sky program with Kammy and Ben Shepperd they slowed it down and GJ pushes Vardy that causes Vardy to kick his standing leg, he trips over and that is clearly the reason both feet are off the ground. Guessing this is the way we portray it in the appeal Are you sure he didnt just do that thing where he basically trips himself up? This is the first time I think I've ever been on Vardy's side after a refereeing decision, no way it's a red for me. He's gone down under pressure and tried to win the ball. Fairly confident it'll be rescinded unless the FA decide to protect Pawson. Is it the FA or Premier League that pick referee's for fixtures? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain... Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 I completely understand why the ref gave it, it looked like he had launched himself at the ball and that is dangerous, but as soon as you see that he was being pushed and pulled by Johnson and that his back leg clips his front leg his attempt at winning the ball, which he did and had every right to go for, turn into a dangerous lunge, but that was Johnson's fault not Vardy's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighPeakFox Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 Although I think the ref got it very wrong, I can entirely see why he gave it - watching it on tv live, it looked absolutely dreadful at speed, without the benefit of having seen it various time since, which we now have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridport007 Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 I think the push made both feet come off the floor. It's a yellow at most for me. I'm getting really bored with how sterile they are trying to make the game. Good tackles are regularly receiving yellow and red cards on a regular basis. I can see why the ref made the call...just, but if they don't do the correct thing and rescind it, then frankly it's all become a bit of a joke. Also, Simpsons hand was behind his neck, not trying to stop the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chapero82 Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 I cant see it being overturned this will be the same excuse http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/10702148/ref-watch-were-citys-goals-onside-red-card-for-zlatan-ibrahimovic-dermot-gallagher-examines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxy boxing Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 he was clearly going for the ball and actually got a bit of it, utterly disgraceful decision by the referee and evan the match of the day pundits thought it was unjust, are refs trying to show they are not favoring us like they were acussed of last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiv Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 16 minutes ago, chapero82 said: I cant see it being overturned this will be the same excuse http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/10702148/ref-watch-were-citys-goals-onside-red-card-for-zlatan-ibrahimovic-dermot-gallagher-examines They can overturn the red card but still support the referee's match day assessment. I think it's 50-50. But do think we have a chance if they argue that Vardy was pushed. He even said immediately after the challenge to Bojan, "I couldn't do anything, he pushed me". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom's Pasta Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 I really worry for the game if this is upheld as a red card, it's gonna become a bloody non contact sport at this rate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARTY_FOX Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 Wasn't a red for me. The lack.of control comes from the push on Vardy. If there's a foul there it comes before the tackle is even made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dayday Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 This is Leicester City we don't get nothing from the f.a. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babylon Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 12 minutes ago, dayday said: This is Leicester City we don't get nothing from the f.a. I thought Spurs said the FA fixed it for us to win the league? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lgfualol Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 Can't imagine it will be rescinded. Maybe they will shorten the ban? On the bright side, with Vardy not in the team and Musa not up to it yet, we might actually play some football on the floor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClaphamFox Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 2 minutes ago, lgfualol said: Can't imagine it will be rescinded. Maybe they will shorten the ban? On the bright side, with Vardy not in the team and Musa not up to it yet, we might actually play some football on the floor. Is shortening the ban an option? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lgfualol Posted 19 December 2016 Share Posted 19 December 2016 Just now, ClaphamFox said: Is shortening the ban an option? Probably not. Would help with rotation if it was though. 3 games in 7 days will be tough if Ranieri keeps with the usual lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.