foxinsocks Posted 6 March 2017 Posted 6 March 2017 Look at the image showing the "shots on target" as 5 to 4.... yet the bars suggest a ratio of 37 to 34 which is much closer to 1:1 than it should be - about 39.4 to 31.6 would have been much better. This makes me wonder if, rather then use some kind of statistical analysis software, the guys at lcfc.com and just guessing how long to make the bars. I didn't check the others - but I think we must demand accurate graphics or the whole this is a waste of time!
Wakeyfox Posted 6 March 2017 Posted 6 March 2017 Surprised no one is asking why drinky and mahrez appear to have been electrocuted imo
Ashley Posted 6 March 2017 Posted 6 March 2017 19 minutes ago, foxinsocks said: Look at the image showing the "shots on target" as 5 to 4.... yet the bars suggest a ratio of 37 to 34 which is much closer to 1:1 than it should be - about 39.4 to 31.6 would have been much better. This makes me wonder if, rather then use some kind of statistical analysis software, the guys at lcfc.com and just guessing how long to make the bars. I didn't check the others - but I think we must demand accurate graphics or the whole this is a waste of time! you being serious?
oxford blue Posted 6 March 2017 Posted 6 March 2017 Must be - shots on target is biased in favour of Hull as not 2:1 ratio Question - is the own goal a 'shot on target'?
Nalis Posted 6 March 2017 Posted 6 March 2017 The change in management clearly hasnt effected the graphics team. Should have kept Ranieri after all.
yorkie1999 Posted 6 March 2017 Posted 6 March 2017 18 minutes ago, Wakeyfox said: Surprised no one is asking why drinky and mahrez appear to have been electrocuted imo Or, more importantly , from where the electricity appears to be emanating from!
Fox42 Posted 6 March 2017 Posted 6 March 2017 39 minutes ago, foxinsocks said: Look at the image showing the "shots on target" as 5 to 4.... yet the bars suggest a ratio of 37 to 34 which is much closer to 1:1 than it should be - about 39.4 to 31.6 would have been much better. This makes me wonder if, rather then use some kind of statistical analysis software, the guys at lcfc.com and just guessing how long to make the bars. I didn't check the others - but I think we must demand accurate graphics or the whole this is a waste of time! I would laugh at this post but as a graphic designer I naturally agree with you. Don't worry pal, I've got your back
DJ Barry Hammond Posted 6 March 2017 Posted 6 March 2017 39 minutes ago, foxinsocks said: Look at the image showing the "shots on target" as 5 to 4.... yet the bars suggest a ratio of 37 to 34 which is much closer to 1:1 than it should be - about 39.4 to 31.6 would have been much better. This makes me wonder if, rather then use some kind of statistical analysis software, the guys at lcfc.com and just guessing how long to make the bars. I didn't check the others - but I think we must demand accurate graphics or the whole this is a waste of time! You should have more issue with the 12 - 6 off target shot bars, because the Hull bar should be exactly half our blue bar... but doesn't appear to be that way!
foxinsocks Posted 6 March 2017 Author Posted 6 March 2017 1 minute ago, DJ Barry Hammond said: You should have more issue with the 12 - 6 off target shot bars, because the Hull bar should be exactly half our blue bar... but doesn't appear to be that way! You're right ... but having found the shots on target sooo flawed i was too distraught to carry on. What does this say about our club's values?
Steven Posted 6 March 2017 Posted 6 March 2017 1 minute ago, foxinsocks said: You're right ... but having found the shots on target sooo flawed i was too distraught to carry on. What does this say about our club's values? Fvck all.
stevelcfc Posted 6 March 2017 Posted 6 March 2017 That's the 3rd different possession % I've seen for the game. Now I feel all out of kilter.
foxinsocks Posted 6 March 2017 Author Posted 6 March 2017 The real crime is often in the coverup rather than the initial simple mistake. ..... let's just sit and watch while the lcfc graphics guys cover their tracks on this one.... ha ha ha... ha ha ha ha Oh i have to go now coz my mum's calling me for supper
Royston. Posted 6 March 2017 Posted 6 March 2017 Hulls foul bar 12 is smaller than our off target 12 or am I going a little ranieri???
Royston. Posted 6 March 2017 Posted 6 March 2017 5 minutes ago, foxinsocks said: The real crime is often in the coverup rather than the initial simple mistake. ..... let's just sit and watch while the lcfc graphics guys cover their tracks on this one.... ha ha ha... ha ha ha ha Oh i have to go now coz my mum's calling me for supper Take your mums supper and eat it in your room like a man
StanSP Posted 6 March 2017 Posted 6 March 2017 2 minutes ago, Royston. said: Hulls foul bar 12 is smaller than our off target 12 or am I going a little ranieri??? it does depend on what the opposition number is
Izzy Posted 6 March 2017 Posted 6 March 2017 30 minutes ago, foxinsocks said: You're right ... but having found the shots on target sooo flawed i was too distraught to carry on. What does this say about our club's values? 12 minutes ago, foxinsocks said: The real crime is often in the coverup rather than the initial simple mistake. ..... let's just sit and watch while the lcfc graphics guys cover their tracks on this one.... ha ha ha... ha ha ha ha Oh i have to go now coz my mum's calling me for supper You need to get proper laid my friend
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.