desertfox2 Posted 8 August 2017 Posted 8 August 2017 3 hours ago, matty98 said: Chelsea need home grown players we don't, if they didn't I'm sure they wouldn't be looking at Drinkwater Exactly and it looks like it's him for 30 odd million or Barkley for 50 so in that case it doesn't look so crazy. Still makes letting Loftus Cheek and Chalobah go a odd move.
Gerard Posted 8 August 2017 Posted 8 August 2017 18 minutes ago, Abrasive fox said: Don't believe everything you read in The press. clever leak from Swansea, we enquired- yes. They then decided to let it be known we bid 40m, we didn't, we said that's what we'd be prepared to pay. The timing of that was after Everton put out an initial bid, to let them know they rejected 40, so 35 was nowhere near.... It's how it works. Really? Swansea and us are mutual back scratchers then.
brucey Posted 8 August 2017 Posted 8 August 2017 6 hours ago, st albans fox said: Has he changed his profile pic on Instagram? If so, what was it? he's not changed it for ages
st albans fox Posted 8 August 2017 Posted 8 August 2017 4 minutes ago, brucey said: he's not changed it for ages Thanks - moronic Chelsea tweeters following in some Roma fans footsteps
LinekersApples Posted 8 August 2017 Posted 8 August 2017 2 hours ago, RODNEY FERNIO said: Oh yes we did .. well that's what was reported anyway If you enquire about a creative player and find out they're valued above 40m.... and then another club bids more than 40m.... a player who has asked to leave and who is probably worth more than said player has a price within the market.
Fox 4 Life Posted 9 August 2017 Posted 9 August 2017 9 minutes ago, Ashley said: Fake? It's not on his Instagram page so must be fake
elvisfmcfly Posted 9 August 2017 Posted 9 August 2017 11 minutes ago, Ashley said: Fake? I cant find his account on there now.
Ashley Posted 9 August 2017 Posted 9 August 2017 From what i seen it was 'deleted'. But to me it looks a fake.
Brainy Posted 9 August 2017 Posted 9 August 2017 Who would be sad enough to mock something like that up
st albans fox Posted 9 August 2017 Posted 9 August 2017 3 minutes ago, Ashley said: From what i seen it was 'deleted'. But to me it looks a fake. Would be very naive to post something ahead of anything official. Players must be aware of their responsibilities in this regard.
brucey Posted 9 August 2017 Posted 9 August 2017 55 minutes ago, Fox 4 Life said: It's not on his Instagram page so must be fake Poor fake, his Instagram account is danny_simpson, not dannysimpson... (also, that's a screenshot of twitter - from at least two months ago, before they changed the square profile pics to round ones) Regards, from FT's resident players social media stalker x
Trav Le Bleu Posted 9 August 2017 Posted 9 August 2017 Also that 1 hour ago, Ashley said: Fake? Clearly a fake, cos at half five this afternoon Danny Simpson was having a medical at Chelsea.
Lambert09 Posted 10 August 2017 Posted 10 August 2017 On 8 August 2017 at 14:08, Gerard said: Really? Swansea and us are mutual back scratchers then. Why? Are they going to say they put a £50 m bid in for Mahrez
Bert Posted 10 August 2017 Posted 10 August 2017 7 hours ago, Ashley said: From what i seen it was 'deleted'. But to me it looks a fake. The key to me is that it was posted in Leicester. Simpson is well known to be living in Manchester, whilst it's not out of the question he could be in Leicester it seems even less convincing at that time when trainings done for the day.
Guest Cujek Posted 10 August 2017 Posted 10 August 2017 8 hours ago, Ashley said: Fake? Nope, we really did win the premier league
LexicalChoice Posted 10 August 2017 Posted 10 August 2017 9 hours ago, brucey said: Poor fake, his Instagram account is danny_simpson, not dannysimpson... (also, that's a screenshot of twitter - from at least two months ago, before they changed the square profile pics to round ones) Regards, from FT's resident players social media stalker x You should be a detective. Great eye!
wardyfox86 Posted 10 August 2017 Posted 10 August 2017 1 minute ago, pmcla26 said: We bid £40 million with add ons of up to £5 million more. Paul Clement confirmed it this week also when he was asked if there had been contact from other clubs and he said yes there has been a bid from one other (than Everton) and interest shown from more clubs. And you think it's got nothing to do with the fact that, if Clement said "nope, only Everton have made a bid for him" then there is no 'auction' as such for the player. Therefore, Everton can sit tight and hope Swansea get twitchy. C'mon, managers are as good as agents at playing the media game.
yorkie1999 Posted 10 August 2017 Posted 10 August 2017 28 minutes ago, pmcla26 said: Furthermore, Swansea don't need to or want to sell so it doesn't matter what Everton bid unless it matches their valuation. It'd be like our situation with Roma and Riyad. And even if they match the valuation, they only have permission to talk to the player. The club are still not forced to sell.
Leeds Fox Posted 10 August 2017 Posted 10 August 2017 8 hours ago, yorkie1999 said: And even if they match the valuation, they only have permission to talk to the player. The club are still not forced to sell. Matching a valuation doesn't give a team permission to speak to a player.
Harry S Posted 11 August 2017 Posted 11 August 2017 It says chadwick daily mail at the bottom corner sooooo
foxinsocks Posted 11 August 2017 Posted 11 August 2017 We're in a spot where two of our best players are tempted to leave for "bigger" clubs. Both riyad and dd are earning 100k pw apparently. ... so its not the money. Yet...How did spurs keep hold of dyer when utd came calling? Personally... if i was rich enough would be prepared to keep a want away player to send the message to the rest of the squad Lets see how southampton get on with van dyke
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.