Poll - Shakey In or Out?

[Bourbon Fox]

 A simple poll to gauge the mood. At this point in time, do you think we should give CS more time or have you seen enough? 

[Dr Marco]

like we say in french: "un oeuf is un oeuf"

[Merging Cultures]

Out

[ARTY_FOX]

Shouldn't have got the job in the first place. Out. 

[Tuna]

He has to go. One win in 11 is pathetic.

[Mark]

Too reactive.

 

The changes he made today were right but he waited too long till we were chasing the game again. Time to move on from this failing 4-4-2 or go.

[Lestoh1]

Out.

[filthyfox]

I'd sack Rudkin first... but why waste time in the last 3 minutes bringing on King? (Too late)

[Redouane]

11 minutes ago, Dr Marco said:

like we say in french: "un oeuf is un oeuf"

N'importe quoi 

[Guest ttfn]

Not fair to sack him yet but it's hard to see a way back from here.

[m4DD0gg]

Out

[ROB-THE-BLUE]

Out. Sadly. He's out of his depth. 

[Strokes]

We are doomed if he stays at the helm. I do like the fat orange twat but unfortunately we need a proper leader.

[woznotwos]

Depends on the alternative. Wouldn't get rid unless someone decent already lined up

 

[Buce]

 

He's absolutely clueless and he's taking us down.

 

Out.

[Samilktray]

We may aswell have Paul Merson in charge

[simFox]

[promised land]

2 minutes ago, ttfn said:

Not fair to sack him yet but it's hard to see a way back from here.

Why should he keep his position then?

 

What has he done to earn that if it’s not fair to sack him? 

[Kitchandro]

Shouldn't even be a question.

 

Anyone who watches football can see we are a disgrace. It's a matter of when, not if, so let's get rid before things get out of hand.

 

I'm wondering why Shakespeare should get more time despite never showing anything as a manager, whilst a man who brought us the league title went when we were in the same position.

[Guest ttfn]

Wider issue here is that we missed a golden opportunity to go in a different direction this summer. 

 

Whoever comes in during the next international break (I'd say it's getting towards odds-on that we'll have a new manager in place before the Man City home game) will just be fire-fighting through December (when there are 7 games) and will still have the same problems Shakespeare has with regards personnel. Implementing the sort of change this club needs is not going to happen mid-season and nor is it going to happen just by changing the manager.

 

That said Shakespeare, dealt a crap hand, is playing it extremely poorly and can have few complaints if he's given his marching orders in the next month if things don't change drastically.

[SheppyFox]

He should have gone after Bournemouth. 

[Daggers]

“We had a lot of possession, it was always important that first goal. The good thing was the players resilience - you saw the never say die attitude today.”

 

”...I thought it was at least what we deserved tonight.”

 

Get out, you clueless sack of shit.

[Guest ttfn]

2 minutes ago, promised land said:

Why should he keep his position then?

 

What has he done to earn that if it’s not fair to sack him? 

Nothing, I am quite conflicted by this as I never thought he should have got the job in the first place and am unsurprised that we're back where we were 8 months ago.

 

Fundamentally though I don't think it's right to say "you're the man" and then make a change after 8 games. I said a few weeks ago that it was fair to judge after 12 games and even if the results weren't good, as long as we were headed in the right direction philosophy/strategy/performance-wise I'd be behind him. That's looking unlikely right now.

[marcymarc666]

 

[Gazza M]

Still acting like the caretaker manager, not the manager. Stamped his mark on the team nil.