Johnthefoxrayner Posted 1 July 2019 Posted 1 July 2019 On 26/06/2019 at 10:19, Deeg67 said: Why should he have to? By saying nothing he's giving the club maximum leverage (unlike a certain someone I could mention) and ensuring there will be no recriminations no matter the outcome. I don't see how any Leicester fan could possibly ask more of a player than what Harry has given us with this potential sale. Maguire has not asked to leave either, he hasn't put a transfer request in,
whoareyaaa Posted 1 July 2019 Posted 1 July 2019 Rodgers probably wants a season with Maguire hence the high valuation, I don't think it would be a good idea to have a new man come in then start selling of your biggest assets.
Countryfox Posted 1 July 2019 Posted 1 July 2019 3 minutes ago, Haywood_6 said: So has interest in Maguire cooled now? Nope ... the shit and the fan are still on collision course ...
Popular Post urban.spaceman Posted 1 July 2019 Popular Post Posted 1 July 2019 38 minutes ago, Stadt said: Honestly we’re idiots if we don’t take £70m+ for him Personally I think we’d be idiots to take anything for him this summer. We should keep the squad together. 6
joachim1965 Posted 1 July 2019 Posted 1 July 2019 33 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said: Personally I think we’d be idiots to take anything for him this summer. We should keep the squad together. It would certainly show the world we mean business.
Stadt Posted 1 July 2019 Posted 1 July 2019 48 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said: Personally I think we’d be idiots to take anything for him this summer. We should keep the squad together. You genuinely wouldn’t take £80m? He’s worth half that realistically. We have replacements and that cash could buy two players of outstanding quality
SouthStandUpperTier Posted 1 July 2019 Posted 1 July 2019 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Stadt said: You genuinely wouldn’t take £80m? He’s worth half that realistically. We have replacements and that cash could buy two players of outstanding quality You could also buy a few overpriced duffers. And we have in the recent past. I'd always rather have the player than the money. Edited 1 July 2019 by SouthStandUpperTier 1
Guest Posted 1 July 2019 Posted 1 July 2019 1 minute ago, SouthStandUpperTier said: You could also buy a few overpriced duffers? And we have in the recent past. I'd always rather have the player than the money. We need to spend regardless though. If Maguire goes for £80m+ then we can budget for a couple of genuinely quality players in addition to Tielemans, rather than having to penny pinch and try to bring in a bargain here and there. Just keeping the squad together isn't enough, you have to keep moving forwards and improving it season after season. The bigger your budget, the more straightforward that ought to be. I could understand it if our squad was already blessed with great depth and balance but it really isn't.
Popular Post SouthStandUpperTier Posted 1 July 2019 Popular Post Posted 1 July 2019 4 minutes ago, Guest said: We need to spend regardless though. If Maguire goes for £80m+ then we can budget for a couple of genuinely quality players in addition to Tielemans, rather than having to penny pinch and try to bring in a bargain here and there. Just keeping the squad together isn't enough, you have to keep moving forwards and improving it season after season. The bigger your budget, the more straightforward that ought to be. I could understand it if our squad was already blessed with great depth and balance but it really isn't. Genuine (established) quality players don't come to Leicester though. Our MO is to buy relatively cheap, young players with the potential to become genuine quality. That is unlikely to change. 8
urban.spaceman Posted 1 July 2019 Posted 1 July 2019 35 minutes ago, Stadt said: You genuinely wouldn’t take £80m? He’s worth half that realistically. We have replacements and that cash could buy two players of outstanding quality Genuinely wouldn’t mate. I won’t get into an argument over what he’s “worth” but I think we’d be foolish to sell him this summer. Realistically I think we can afford Tielemans and hopefully a marquee winger without having to sell Maguire or Chilwell (There are plenty of other names that can be moved on to bring in cash to spend). If we keep this squad together and add well enough for it, we can qualify for Europe this season. If Maguire wants to go next summer then we could easily get £100m for him. 1
Stadt Posted 1 July 2019 Posted 1 July 2019 21 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said: Genuinely wouldn’t mate. I won’t get into an argument over what he’s “worth” but I think we’d be foolish to sell him this summer. Realistically I think we can afford Tielemans and hopefully a marquee winger without having to sell Maguire or Chilwell (There are plenty of other names that can be moved on to bring in cash to spend). If we keep this squad together and add well enough for it, we can qualify for Europe this season. If Maguire wants to go next summer then we could easily get £100m for him. Our transfer business is more intelligent these days so I’d trust us not to make any horrendous mistakes. Liverpool didn’t need to sell Coutinho but that cash bought Allison and VVD, now there’s no guarantee we buy two players that improve us to that extent but, personally, £65m-85m is of greater value to us than Maguire is. I’d like to think we can afford a quality winger and Tielemans but I’m unconvinced, if it’s a case of sell Maguire to get a wide player and Youri then for me it’s thanks a bunch Harry but goodbye 1
Guest Posted 1 July 2019 Posted 1 July 2019 42 minutes ago, SouthStandUpperTier said: Genuine (established) quality players don't come to Leicester though. Our MO is to buy relatively cheap, young players with the potential to become genuine quality. That is unlikely to change. They do if you know where to look - Ricardo would be the obvious example of a player who satisfies my criteria of being an established quality player and yours of being relatively cheap and young. I'm not saying we suddenly start spunking hundreds of millions on galacticos, but I'm absolutely convinced that we could use that money to leave the squad in a better overall state. That doesn't mean we stop buying young talented players on an upwards trajectory - if anything, it means we can buy more of them and we don't have to rely on hoping punts for players like Ghezzal come off. We buy a Ricardo for every position, if you get my drift. I should make it clear - if Maguire stays I'll be very pleased. I love watching him and it'd be a shame to see him go. I still think it'd be a mistake to turn down a massive offer when there are areas of our squad that could really use the investment.
st albans fox Posted 1 July 2019 Posted 1 July 2019 3 hours ago, Guest said: I should make it clear - if Maguire stays I'll be very pleased. I love watching him and it'd be a shame to see him go. I still think it'd be a mistake to turn down a massive offer when there are areas of our squad that could really use the investment. Yes, with benko injured a lot and Calgar a potential bomb scare from time to time, a new centre half should Harry go ......,,
Chrysalis Posted 2 July 2019 Posted 2 July 2019 11 hours ago, Stadt said: Honestly we’re idiots if we don’t take £70m+ for him why?
Chrysalis Posted 2 July 2019 Posted 2 July 2019 (edited) 10 hours ago, Stadt said: You genuinely wouldn’t take £80m? He’s worth half that realistically. We have replacements and that cash could buy two players of outstanding quality We dont have any ball dribbling CB's to replace him. He is unique. Also the transfer market is a lottery, we could easily spend the money on duds. I would only take money for him, if it was a requirement to get tielemans. Also probably minimum 90-100 million. As we need compensating for the fact it will set the team back bedding in a replacement, the duds we will inevitably buy with the money to find another good player. Edited 2 July 2019 by Chrysalis
Popular Post Nickbluefox Posted 2 July 2019 Popular Post Posted 2 July 2019 11 minutes ago, Chrysalis said: We dont have any ball dribbling CB's to replace him. He is unique. Also the transfer market is a lottery, we could easily spend the money on duds. I would only take money for him, if it was a requirement to get tielemans. Also probably minimum 90-100 million. As we need compensating for the fact it will set the team back bedding in a replacement, the duds we will inevitably buy with the money to find another good player. Soyuncu is a ball dribbling CB who has shown to be as good as HM on the ball. I think he'll be awesome if given the time. 6
Guest TaggertvsWise Posted 2 July 2019 Posted 2 July 2019 6 hours ago, st albans fox said: Yes, with benko injured a lot and Calgar a potential bomb scare from time to time, a new centre half should Harry go ......,, I get tired of reading this. He is a young player who needs our support and belief not casual insults thrown at him.
Dahnsouff Posted 2 July 2019 Posted 2 July 2019 5 minutes ago, TaggertvsWise said: I get tired of reading this. He is a young player who needs our support and belief not casual insults thrown at him. Quite agree. Harry really is the messiah it seems. Caglar is a good player, and will get better with more game time. He was a bit rash early doors. But he is no Benny (How we miss you) is he?
Popular Post CloudFox Posted 2 July 2019 Popular Post Posted 2 July 2019 How on earth have people decided that Caglar is a bomb scare? He had one rusty moment that I can remember, but he's barely played enough games and was adapting. He's a great back up with excellent potential. Just what we need, along with Benkovic. 12 1
volpeazzurro Posted 2 July 2019 Posted 2 July 2019 5 minutes ago, TaggertvsWise said: I get tired of reading this. He is a young player who needs our support and belief not casual insults thrown at him. We never learn do we, you're absolutely right. What do people reasonably expect? First it was Chilwell who got an absolute slagging, a kid in his first season up against seasoned professionals, now an England international. Now again Soyuncu. Again a kid who has had a couple of games in a higher standard, pacier and more physical league to what he's used to. As we haven't got the money to go out and buy a ready made Van Dyke or similarly ready made seasoned international fullback etc some fans need to think on. Our model is actually bearing fruit now and i fir one find it quite exciting. How many of our young players are there currently rumours about? Some must sit and clap their hands with glee like demented seals when they witness another rooky mistake because they can then get on their keyboards and big themselves up as a football expert as they wallow in the ability to point out mistakes. Funny how Klopp, Guadiola, Rodgers and Southgate seem to appreciate such young talent yet our knowledgeable keyboard warriors can only find faults. 2
weller54 Posted 2 July 2019 Posted 2 July 2019 13 minutes ago, CloudFox said: How on earth have people decided that Caglar is a bomb scare? He had one rusty moment that I can remember, but he's barely played enough games and was adapting. He's a great back up with excellent potential. Just what we need, along with Benkovic. That's nothing.... Some have already decided Justin is shit because of what he was wearing on his first day walking into training!!.. Justin out!! 1
CloudFox Posted 2 July 2019 Posted 2 July 2019 (edited) 23 minutes ago, weller54 said: That's nothing.... Some have already decided Justin is shit because of what he was wearing on his first day walking into training!!.. Justin out!! #NewsJustOut Edited 2 July 2019 by CloudFox
lgfualol Posted 2 July 2019 Posted 2 July 2019 Can we change the title to "Man City". Anyone that refers to Manchester City as 'City' should get a lengthy ban imo 2
Recommended Posts