orangecity23 Posted 27 June 2019 Posted 27 June 2019 WAAA MAGUIRE IS OVERPRICED. WAAA 80 MILLION SHOULD BUY THE BEST DEFENDER IN THE WORLD, MAGUIRE's NOT WORTH THAT MUCH. Good. **** off and buy that best defender then. We'll keep Maguire, you can fritter your cash away elsewhere.
Koke Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 This much for an unproven 19 year old from the Portuguese league. And they say Maguire is overpriced.
foxes_rule1978 Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 We don’t want to sell him, we have no need to sell him and he has a long term contract here, hence the price tag that we have put on him. It isn’t like a few years ago when these clubs could get players from teams like ours for a cut price.
FrankieADZ Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 11 hours ago, urban.spaceman said: “Leicester City are inflating the market” thats actually pretty funny tbh, since that Utd fan was saying crap about HM not being worth £100mil or roundabouts but forgets all the money theyve spent on players who cant even get in the starting 11 there what a deluded fruit cake, no one is batting an eye lid them spending £50 mil on AWB from Palace but we set an £80-100mil price tag on HM and we get called, hypocritical much
fuchsntf Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 12 minutes ago, FrankieADZ said: thats actually pretty funny tbh, since that Utd fan was saying crap about HM not being worth £100mil or roundabouts but forgets all the money theyve spent on players who cant even get in the starting 11 there what a deluded fruit cake, no one is batting an eye lid them spending £50 mil on AWB from Palace but we set an £80-100mil price tag on HM and we get called, hypocritical much The ones complaining,das Not hardened Core Manutds fans. They are the plastics,from around the globe.....shitstirring it ,as usual.!
sylofox Posted 28 June 2019 Author Posted 28 June 2019 We really should know our place. We should be so happy the manc clubs want him. How about we pay them to take him?
reynard Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 If Man Utd or Man City or Liverpool or Chelsea want any player from any club then that club should always set a premium price of plus 20%. These clubs are loaded and should be made to pay the maximum amount possible for any player. Clubs in the Premier League don't need to keep selling their best players and it isn't good for the health of the game if a few clubs have most of the best players on their books. It is also bad for the National team as young English, and indeed British pros, are not getting game time. I think it would be excellent if temas like us, Wolves, Everton etc started offering money for the best young players at sides like Chelsea, Man City etc just to unsettle their clubs. After all we can probably offer more prospects of playing regular football. Of course agents are the big stumbling block in all of this.
ClaphamFox Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 13 hours ago, Paninistickers said: I don't think the media give two hoots who plays where. Instead, as a commercial enterprise, they make more money speculating on big club player/politics/strategy....Any business minded editor worth his salt would demand accurate well sourced stories...but ideally stories which mass numbers want to read This. The idea that the media is involved in some kind of conspiracy to force the transfers of players to 'big' clubs is so obviously ridiculous if you pause to think about it even for a few seconds, yet you hear it repeated all the time. The media knows that people in this country love football - it's a huge business. During the close season, when there is little actual news to report on, transfer speculation is the only way to fill the pages/airwaves. Some of the rumours may have substance, most probably won't. It really doesn't matter. There are lots of rumours about our players right now simply because we have a very good young squad with a number of players who are only going to improve. That attracts transfer gossip, but it's not a conspiracy.
whoareyaaa Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 12 hours ago, urban.spaceman said: “Leicester City are inflating the market” 47 Million for Fred
The Guvnor Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 So Man Utd interested in Bruno Fernandes from Sporting.... And they think we take the piss .?
Dahnsouff Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 4 minutes ago, whoareyaaa said: 47 Million for Fred I'll see your £46m for Fred and raise you a £75m for Lukalump
urban fox Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 12 minutes ago, reynard said: If Man Utd or Man City or Liverpool or Chelsea want any player from any club then that club should always set a premium price of plus 20%. These clubs are loaded and should be made to pay the maximum amount possible for any player. Clubs in the Premier League don't need to keep selling their best players and it isn't good for the health of the game if a few clubs have most of the best players on their books. It is also bad for the National team as young English, and indeed British pros, are not getting game time. I think it would be excellent if temas like us, Wolves, Everton etc started offering money for the best young players at sides like Chelsea, Man City etc just to unsettle their clubs. After all we can probably offer more prospects of playing regular football. Of course agents are the big stumbling block in all of this. This is exactly what I have been saying here and elsewhere. how would they like it if we tried to pinch the likes of Foden from them. The only stumbling block is probably the fact that they pay wages that are out of our league for people to warm their bench just so other clubs cannot get them.
whoareyaaa Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 4 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said: I'll see your £46m for Fred and raise you a £75m for Lukalump 122m combined - bargain
Sol thewall Bamba Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 Agree this should be locked, there's no news. $ky just recirculating the same old shit to drive transfer bets.
Fox85 Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 I hope we dont sell and just continue to improve the squad if we push and manage top 6 next season. Maguire will be worth around 100m. Keep our best players and improve weaker areas and we could be a force
Jacnah Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 12 hours ago, sylofox said: It's not the price that's pissing them off. It's the fact little Leicester won't bow down to them and cave in. We really should give them a pay up or feck off price. Completely agree with this. Whilst there is still definitely the "haves and have nots" when it comes to revenue, Premier League money is diffusing power to a wider number of teams. That is irksome to clubs and fans who have it it all their own way for far to long. Long may it continue
AKCJ Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 4 hours ago, Koke said: This much for an unproven 19 year old from the Portuguese league. And they say Maguire is overpriced. This is the most obscene transfer I think there has ever been.
Dahnsouff Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 Just now, AKCJ said: This is the most obscene transfer I think there has ever been. but, but, but...its fine as he is a "generational talent"
Rusko187 Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 2 hours ago, foxes_rule1978 said: We don’t want to sell him, we have no need to sell him and he has a long term contract here, hence the price tag that we have put on him. It isn’t like a few years ago when these clubs could get players from teams like ours for a cut price. They don't listen to logic, trust me on that. They seem to think that other teams in the Prem develop players for the purpose of the top 4, and that we should roll over on price when they come knocking!
Jon the Hat Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 30 minutes ago, Sol thewall Bamba said: Agree this should be locked, there's no news. $ky just recirculating the same old shit to drive transfer bets. Sky do not own Skybet. Or any other betting company. They sell advertising based on clicks.
Sol thewall Bamba Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 39 minutes ago, Jon the Hat said: Sky do not own Skybet. Or any other betting company. They sell advertising based on clicks. OK, I wasn't aware of that but they're still driving traffic via basically fake news to gain PPC advertising revenue.
Bazly Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 No one seems to know what Arry is valued at. Some foreign hacks have him as £40mn, then the Manchester clubs seem to be thinking £60mn and we seem to be anywhere from £65mn to £100mn. Its like think up a number. If Slim was £30mn Arry has to be £100mn. I'd retire on that money, take my Kodi box with me for August to May and chase women the rest of the time. Maybe we need more female refs, to speed Arry up a bit on the field?
PaulW Posted 28 June 2019 Posted 28 June 2019 24 minutes ago, Bazly said: No one seems to know what Arry is valued at. Some foreign hacks have him as £40mn, then the Manchester clubs seem to be thinking £60mn and we seem to be anywhere from £65mn to £100mn. Its like think up a number. If Slim was £30mn Arry has to be £100mn. I'd retire on that money, take my Kodi box with me for August to May and chase women the rest of the time. Maybe we need more female refs, to speed Arry up a bit on the field? Glad to see you wouldn't waste it on anything trivia.
Danizen Posted 29 June 2019 Posted 29 June 2019 https://www.football365.com/news/f365-says-man-utd-must-go-hard-and-high-for-maguire Reading this has made me hope we harden our resolve and put off a transfer until at least next year. Things are lining up for us perfectly and we can't let it all go to waste by dismantling the squad without any fight.
sylofox Posted 29 June 2019 Author Posted 29 June 2019 On 28/06/2019 at 09:12, whoareyaaa said: 122m combined - bargain Maths not a strong point? Or did I miss something
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.