Big Dave Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 Let’s hope that Southampton are this piss poor on Sunday.
Md9 Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 3 minutes ago, StanSP said: @The Bear And neves tested positive for COVID sorry if was posted further back
filbertway Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 That's wolves not scoring again this season! They're pathetic enough with Neto dragging them through games.
foxfan92 Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 West Brom have suddenly worked out how to win a game of football and their playing like a different team, scoring for fun. Feel really sorry for whichever poor team plays them next in the league... 4
Guest Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 32 minutes ago, filbertway said: If they can't tell he's onside with no lines then they need to sacked. Terrible. Bin the whole thing. Oh yeah he absolutely looks onside but the broadcast angles are often pretty misleading, which I guess is the point of the lines in the first place. I don't disagree at all the the current system is woefully inadequate and the people responsible for operating it aren't up to it, but sacking it off would mean more of these particular situations (i.e. the TV images show the player visibly/clearly onside but he's given off anyway) not fewer. 26 minutes ago, Super_horns said: But they did the lines to the wrong player .. I don't think that's what happened - they didn't draw a line to the attacking player at all because they didn't have the angle to do so. The line they drew is to Vestergaard, not Bartley.
UpTheLeagueFox Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 12 minutes ago, foxfan92 said: West Brom have suddenly worked out how to win a game of football and their playing like a different team, scoring for fun. Feel really sorry for whichever poor team plays them next in the league... My worry is that they'd park the bus, which they may still do. A bit more confidence from them may leave them more open.
StanSP Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 I'd gladly try and get Pereira in summer if West Brom go down. 2
filbertway Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 1 minute ago, Guest said: Oh yeah he absolutely looks onside but the broadcast angles are often pretty misleading, which I guess is the point of the lines in the first place. I don't disagree at all the the current system is woefully inadequate and the people responsible for operating it aren't up to it, but sacking it off would mean more of these particular situations (i.e. the TV images show the player visibly/clearly onside but he's given off anyway) not fewer. Having had referee mistakes pre and post VAR. I'd rather go back to human error. Purely as I miss being able to celebrate a goal. The joy that it's taking out of the game is much bigger than the "benefit" of the game. For me anyway 3
Guest Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 1 minute ago, filbertway said: Having had referee mistakes pre and post VAR. I'd rather go back to human error. Purely as I miss being able to celebrate a goal. The joy that it's taking out of the game is much bigger than the "benefit" of the game. For me anyway Yep I'm with you on that. I was massively in favour of it being brought in, and I still am in favour of the principle of using technology to help officials get decisions right, but the current implementation is so poor. Like you say, it takes away much more than it adds. 4
Nuneatonfox in Manchester Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 Who’s on VAR? That’s laughable, not Dean again is it? The wrong bloody player what an absolute buffoon.
Zear0 Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 Thought they were meant to keep the flag down for tight calls? It would have been a goal then if they went on-field. Not saying its easy, but the officiating is so inconsistent you don't even know where you stand with some decisions.
Super_horns Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 8 minutes ago, Guest said: Oh yeah he absolutely looks onside but the broadcast angles are often pretty misleading, which I guess is the point of the lines in the first place. I don't disagree at all the the current system is woefully inadequate and the people responsible for operating it aren't up to it, but sacking it off would mean more of these particular situations (i.e. the TV images show the player visibly/clearly onside but he's given off anyway) not fewer. I don't think that's what happened - they didn't draw a line to the attacking player at all because they didn't have the angle to do so. The line they drew is to Vestergaard, not Bartley. Not sure - only going by what has been said by others. Honest mistake in real time by the assistant not corrected by the VAR?
Guest Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 Just now, Super_horns said: Not sure - only going by what has been said by others. Honest mistake in real time by the assistant not corrected by the VAR? My understanding is lino flagged, VAR went to check and get the lines out but there wasn't an angle from which they could draw a clear line to the attacker in question as he was obscured by a teammate and a defender. Thus they couldn't provide a definite conclusion either way so stuck with lino's decision. He definitely looked onside from the angles we saw on TV. 1
The Bear Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 The FA needs to sack Mike Riley asap and just go with how VAR is used with the rest of Europe. It's getting beyond a joke now. 1
Big Dave Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 16 minutes ago, StanSP said: I'd gladly try and get Pereira in summer if West Brom go down. I think he would be a great buy. I have seen him play a few times, and he really stands out. Wonder what his value would be?
SuperMike Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 Ralph told his men to step up three gears or they wont be in the team to play Brendan's Blue Bottling Boys at Wembley! Different side altogether in the second half.
davieG Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 15 minutes ago, Guest said: My understanding is lino flagged, VAR went to check and get the lines out but there wasn't an angle from which they could draw a clear line to the attacker in question as he was obscured by a teammate and a defender. Thus they couldn't provide a definite conclusion either way so stuck with lino's decision. He definitely looked onside from the angles we saw on TV. Surely if they couldn’t see any of the goal scorer behind the attacker then he’s onside.
Md9 Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 Do Southampton have their best 11 out or resting anyone?
fox_up_north Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 Surely Southampton won't be this crap come the weekend?
Pliskin Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 Suddenly West Brom don’t look so beatable...... 1 1
Super_horns Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 24 minutes ago, Guest said: My understanding is lino flagged, VAR went to check and get the lines out but there wasn't an angle from which they could draw a clear line to the attacker in question as he was obscured by a teammate and a defender. Thus they couldn't provide a definite conclusion either way so stuck with lino's decision. He definitely looked onside from the angles we saw on TV. Well i suppose in someways that is a good idea if it's not clear and obvious but then we see so many decisions changed which aren't/ 1 minute ago, fox_up_north said: Surely Southampton won't be this crap come the weekend? Of course not - they just have't bothered trying today saving themselves for Sunday.
Lets Be having You Posted 12 April 2021 Posted 12 April 2021 1 minute ago, Pliskin said: Suddenly West Brom don’t look so beatable...... I was thinking exactly the same it's going to be a tough game.
Recommended Posts