AjcW Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 I can’t believe Valery still gets games for Southampton. I know Ralf like fixing people but that lad is beyond help 1
Mash21 Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 8 minutes ago, seanfox778 said: Beauty of a goal by Mahrez Vintage Mahrez, absolutely brilliant finish.
Koke Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 Man City are playing Mahrez as a false 9. They can play this well without a recognised out and out striker. Hope we can do the same.
Mash21 Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 3 minutes ago, Goober said: Yeah City are romping their way to this title. Too good I think with the inconsistency show in the season, if city can go on a bit of a winning run then they could win the title easily.
Mash21 Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 1 minute ago, Koke said: Man City are playing Mahrez as a false 9. They can play this well without a recognised out and out striker. Hope we can do the same. I think it shows the quality Man City possess when they don't even have a recognised striker and they're top of the league. Credit to pep as much as I don't like him 1
Arkie Bennett Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 Mahrez's first touch is wondrous. Our 9-0 record could be under threat.
Sunbury Fox Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 8 minutes ago, Goober said: Yeah City are romping their way to this title. Too good Let's not get ahead of ourselves.
Koke Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 Barnes- Vardy ' Mahrez Maddison Tielemans Ndidi Imagine the carnage this team would cause. 1
FOXSE Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 Let's see where man City are on the 7th of March....
Sharpe's Fox Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 (edited) . Edited 26 January 2021 by Sharpe's Fox
Sharpe's Fox Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 I would expect Man City to win the league from here but wouldn’t be surprised to see Pep play Benjamin Mendy as a rush goalie for 3 games, bottle it completely then blame the FA. 1
PhillippaT Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 5 minutes ago, Koke said: Barnes- Vardy ' Mahrez Maddison Tielemans Ndidi Imagine the carnage this team would cause. The universe decided it wouldn't be allowed
TJB-fox Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 Man City could threaten our 9nil here if they step on the gas again
KingsX Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 Think Sterling was offside for their fifth? All of us LCFC fans watching this game and pulling for West Brom to hold it to eight ... reminds me of Derby fans desperate for Sheffield United to win 1
jamfox Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 Was just thinking the same, its lambs to the slaughter
David Hankey Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 1 hour ago, Leicester_Loyal said: Correct, but that doesn't sit right with me, they just change the rules as they go along to protect themselves. That's all this 'interpretation of the rules' is about, protecting themselves week after week. I agree.
David Hankey Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 54 minutes ago, Babylon said: Well the law makers disagree with you. Well they may do now but as I say the incident AT THE TIME was not against the rules or laws of the game.
David Hankey Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 Allardyce will be gone in morning, Chelski, perhaps?
Wymsey Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 Reckon West Brom should've stuck with Bilic, as at least he would've made them more competitive..
foxfanazer Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 Southampton down to 11th now. What an odd season this is
Corky Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 West Brom have conceded three goals or more in five consecutive home league matches. Must be a record?
Guest Electric Yetis Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 Southampton's form has fallen off a bit hasn't it? Hadn't really been paying attention but as it stands they are 11th. Doesn't seem five minutes since they were top.
Babylon Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 10 minutes ago, David Hankey said: Well they may do now but as I say the incident AT THE TIME was not against the rules or laws of the game. Because the caveat used for another offside scenario could be interpreted that way. They’ve now closed that loop hole because it was a farce, people were miffed because no matter what the laws said it’s not right. Hence the change.
Recommended Posts