filbertway Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 24 minutes ago, winteriscoming said: The Leeds keeper is dreadful. He really isn't 1
winteriscoming Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 13 minutes ago, filbertway said: He really isn't Ok. We’ll see Sunday. Every time I see him he looks extremely dodgy.
Wymsey Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 Just now, winteriscoming said: Ok. We’ll see Sunday. Every time I see him he looks extremely dodgy. He's only 20 years old. Am sure Kasper Schmeichel was dodgy at times at that age.
Corky Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 I take it Karren Brady won't be calling for the season to be declared null and void this time? https://www.theguardian.com/football/2020/mar/14/west-ham-karren-brady-calls-for-premier-league-cancellation-coronavirus 1 3
CrispinLA in Texas Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 (edited) West Ham above Spuds, Chelski and Arsethumb. Luving it! Edited 26 January 2021 by CrispinLA in Texas
David Hankey Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 2 hours ago, Leicester_Loyal said: 1. I've never blamed Rodri nor Man City. 2. If that's the case, why would it now be ruled out less than a week later? 3. Once again just shows a lack of consistancy from one week to the next with officiating, I think that's what a lot of people have a problem with, so it's ok for Man City to score like that, but when WBA score like it this weekend, it'll now be ruled out Whether the rules have been changed now, tomorrow or at the end of the season the FACT remains that when the "incident" happened Rodri did nothing wrong. That's all I'm pointing out, therefore the goal was good. It has nothing to do with being a big club or not.
HankMarvin Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 (edited) 5 minutes ago, SuperMike said: West Ham now 4th! Dildo brothers and Eve Vorley will be chuffed Edited 26 January 2021 by HankMarvin
Kingleicester Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 39 minutes ago, SAFC1 said: How open are Leeds?! They’re 2-1 up away from home... it’s ridiculous. Absolutely fair play to them, great for the neutral, looking at the teams that came up with them, there doing something right,
peach0000 Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 3 minutes ago, CrispinLA in Texas said: West Ham above Spuds, Chelski and Arsenal. Luving it! Don’t forget Liverpool as well
David Hankey Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 2 hours ago, pmcla26 said: There's a difference between not understanding why the goal was allowed and understanding why it was allowed but still questioning why a big 6 club has benefitted from yet another refereeing error, decision, interpretation of the rule.. whatever you want to call it. There was no refereeing error nor a mis-interpretation of the rules. As the rules stood at the time on that day the goal was good. It would have been an injustice had it been ruled out.
Kingleicester Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 8 minutes ago, SuperMike said: West Ham now 4th! Must be an odd season 🤣
foxinsocks Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 1 minute ago, Kingleicester said: Absolutely fair play to them, great for the neutral, looking at the teams that came up with them, there doing something right, We will recalibrate them next week 1
CrispinLA in Texas Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 1 minute ago, peach0000 said: Don’t forget Liverpool as well Just mentioning the mega rich London teams matey
David Hankey Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, Babylon said: You do realise they’ve changed the guidance because the laws that technically played him onside, were meant for something else. They’ve closed the loop hole, it’s now offside. I appreciate the "guidance" may have changed but there was no need to do so. There was no loophole to close. Had Mings not touched/played the ball then Rodri would have been flagged offside. Tinkering with the laws of the game is so unnecessary and just confuses a simple situation. You could, quite rightly, argued that it was possible "ungentlemanly" conduct but the game is no longer player by gentlemen. Edited 26 January 2021 by David Hankey
StanSP Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 That's one of the goals of the season from Gundogan.
rico Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 Great goal by Saints immediately after Lacazette blows a one on one down the other end
HybridFox Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 15 minutes ago, Kingleicester said: Must be an odd season 🤣 West Ham also did well in THAT season 2
Leicester_Loyal Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 21 minutes ago, David Hankey said: Whether the rules have been changed now, tomorrow or at the end of the season the FACT remains that when the "incident" happened Rodri did nothing wrong. That's all I'm pointing out, therefore the goal was good. It has nothing to do with being a big club or not. Correct, but that doesn't sit right with me, they just change the rules as they go along to protect themselves. That's all this 'interpretation of the rules' is about, protecting themselves week after week.
Vacamion Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 29 minutes ago, CrispinLA in Texas said: West Ham above Spuds, Chelski and Arsethumb. Luving it! Liverpool and West Ham play each other at the weekend, too. If Liverpool lose to Spurs on Thursday (quite possible) it becomes an even more massive game. Marvellous.
Wymsey Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 (edited) Wonder what Allardyce was muttering about towards the lines person there.. Edited 26 January 2021 by Wymsey
Sunbury Fox Posted 26 January 2021 Posted 26 January 2021 Yawn, Man City with another win in the bag already.
Recommended Posts