Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I love Peter Drury, but I’m quite sure he didn’t have to explain what a shots per goal stat meant lol 

  • Haha 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, UniFox21 said:

Caught out 3 times now with fullbacks too high up.

Exactly. If we play like this, may as well play Barnes and Under so we control the game from up too. We are either here nor there with this crappy formation and team selection. Guess this is Rodgers’ way of fitting Maddison in while trying to still provide width with Justin and Albrighton out wide relatively up top.

Posted

Can't help feel that 4-4-2 with Under and Barnes involved would have been the way to go here, Brendan. Under could turn the 6'7" fullback inside out. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Parafox said:

Amazon prime feed is shit. Crap picture all fuzzy and now it's buffering 

not Amazon's fault, it depends on how shite your ISP is, how far from the exchange you are if you have traditional ADSL, and how good your router and internal network are Im afraid...

Posted
5 minutes ago, Aus Fox said:

It’s not 5 at the back... pass it on

But it is though. The fullbacks might push on a bit but they are still defenders.

Posted

 

Youri seems a lot less involved and is not influencing our attacking play like he can do.

 

Just popping short passes.

 

I hope he can stamp his class on proceedings.

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, AjcW said:

I love Peter Drury, but I’m quite sure he didn’t have to explain what a shots per goal stat meant lol 

I can’t wait until he explains pass completion!!!

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, Flappit said:

Can't help feel that 4-4-2 with Under and Barnes involved would have been the way to go here, Brendan. Under could turn the 6'7" fullback inside out. 

He's set his stall out though, he's seen something in us seldom ever being beaten or even drawing at home to teams of this ilk playing 4-1-4-1 and decided he needs to change it. Just got to wait until he can no longer justify it, however annoying that is.

Posted
Just now, Dames said:

But it is though. The fullbacks might push on a bit but they are still defenders.

Watch the game and look at their positions, look how high up the field they are both playing. 
Clearly a back 3 not a back 5. 

Posted

You get the feeling that if we manage to win this it will be because we have the better players. Not because of the team selection /system. :dunno:

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...