FBS

[CrispinLA in Texas]

32 minutes ago, Collymore said:

At first glance this might make no business sense but what about paying a charity to have their name on our shirt? Yes, we'd be losing revenue in that area from a paying sponsor but we'd be further emaphasiing our ethical principles on a global scale.

 

Imagine walking around with Cancer Research or some other charity that resonates with every corner of the globe. To me that would be priceless and make me so proud. 

These so called Charities are just as dirty as the gambling industry, examples are the owner's of Man city, UAE and UNICEF who were used to spin a positive image of the Owners and UAE regarding using poor underage kids as call jockey's when the some American politican started a court case against them. These Charities are just as corrupt and dodgy as any other large organizations.

Edited 12 June 2021 by CrispinLA in Texas

[Collymore]

6 minutes ago, pmcla26 said:

In a normal world would be all for this, in this world unfortunately don’t think it’s really viable with the current financial landscape. 

Oh I totally understand that. It's a real shame. 

[dmayne7]

1 minute ago, CrispinLA in Texas said:

These so called Charities are just as dirty as the gambling industry, examples are the owner's of Man city, UAE and UNICEF who were used to spin a positive image of the Owners and UAE regarding using poor underage kids as call jockey's. These Charities are just as corrupt and dodgy as any other large organizations.

Some are yes but the vast majority are absolutely squeaky clean.

[Collymore]

2 minutes ago, CrispinLA in Texas said:

These so called Charities are just as the gambling industry, examples are the owner's of Man city, UAE and UNICEF who were used to spin a positive image of the Owners and UAE regarding using poor underage kids as call jockey's. These Charities are just as corrupt and dodgy as any other large organizations.

Sorry I'm struggling to understand what you've posted there but I think you're trying to say large charities, such as Cancer Research, are rife with corruption?

[urban.spaceman]

Doesn’t seems to be posted on the clubs socials yet but stumbled upon this on the official site:

 

FBS Becomes Principal Partner of Leicester City

 

In August 2021, FBS international trading company and Leicester City Football Club, 2021 FA Cup and Commuinity Shield winners, officially launched their partnership following the ceremonial signing of the three-year partnership agreement between FBS’ CEO Yulia Ivanova and Leicester City’s CEO Susan Whelan, which was held online due to the ongoing pandemic.

Yulia Ivanova, FBS Chief Executive Officer, said: “We are delighted and very proud to become a principle partner of Leicester City Football Club. Leicester City is a very talented and ambitious team, as we are. So together, we are excited for a very successful partnership. We believe that Leicester City will continue to excel on-and-off the pitch and to make their fans proud and FBS clients, as usual, will continue to get the best service, comfortable, and up-to-date trading solutions. We want to empower people to fulfill their dreams and enjoy their lives because FBS is always by your side.”

Susan Whelan, Leicester City Chief Executive Officer, said: “This three-year partnership is a marvellous new chapter in Leicester City’s history. We’re proud to collaborate with such an ambitious and fast-developing top trading company as FBS. Together, we have an opportunity to engage and inspire our fans and our communities – both locally and on a global scale. We’re looking forward to exciting times ahead together.”

FBS Becomes Principal Partner of Leicester City

FBS, an international trading company, signed a partnership agreement with Leicester City Football Club.

The partnership between one of the trading industry leaders and one of England’s top football clubs creates further opportunities for people globally. Any person, whether a fan, trader or investor, can benefit from generous promotions, joint events, and gifts, including the home game tickets and merchandise.

After 12 years in the market, FBS has grown its solid ecosystem of convenient and assessable investment and trading solutions. Their innovative and client-oriented approach to service, marked by more than 60 international awards, has already attracted over 17 million clients from almost all countries, including Thailand, England, India, Brazil, China. 

Leicester City have created a global community of fans spanning cultures and continents following their famous Premier League win in 2015/16 and FA Cup in in 2021, making the club an ideal fit for FBS. The partnership will enable the club to continue to improve and grow while enhancing the profile of both the Club and FBS around the world.

 

https://www.lcfc.com/news/2213506/fbs-becomes-principal-partner-of-leicester-city

[urban.spaceman]

Video posted at the link too.

[Out Foxed]

if only their logo was as innovative as their approach

[Guest safetosurfthisbeach]

Their website states that 73 per cent of traders lose money with them. It also possible to lose more than you staked. You'd have to be stupid to go anywhere near FBS.

 

[STUHILL]

How much they giving us? That's all I care about. We need a RW ffs 

[Beechey]

45 minutes ago, safetosurfthisbeach said:

Their website states that 73 per cent of traders lose money with them. It also possible to lose more than you staked. You'd have to be stupid to go anywhere near FBS.

 

That's not just FBS, consider if you're trading CFD's. They're very highly leveraged, so can go up or down very quickly. Because they're purchased on margin, you can lose more than is in your account.

 

In the UK, every brokerage that allows CFD trading will have a similar warning to that above:

 

Trading212

 

IBKR

 

 

The brokers aren't placing orders on your account...

Edited 12 August 2021 by Beechey

[lifted*fox]

1 hour ago, safetosurfthisbeach said:

Their website states that 73 per cent of traders lose money with them. It also possible to lose more than you staked. You'd have to be stupid to go anywhere near FBS.

 

 

standard stuff, really nothing to get upset about

 

you play the investment market, you may lose some money, especially with options

[LCFCCHRIS]

3 hours ago, Out Foxed said:

if only their logo was as innovative as their approach

Could be worse.. could be a shite betting company with chinese symbols slapped all over it

[Lesta Legend]

46 minutes ago, Beechey said:

That's not just FBS, consider if you're trading CFD's. They're very highly leveraged, so can go up or down very quickly. Because they're purchased on margin, you can lose more than is in your account.

 

In the UK, every brokerage that allows CFD trading will have a similar warning to that above:

 

Trading212

 

IBKR

 

 

The brokers aren't placing orders on your account...

Yup, execution only, the value of your investments can go up and down is standard warning in the SIPP and investment industry, standard with high risk. Usually high net worth and sophisticated investors who can afford to make losses. 

[lifted*fox]

19 minutes ago, Lesta Legend said:

Usually high net worth and sophisticated investors who can afford to make losses. 

 

dont forget retail investors like me, i love losing money too

[Ginger_Filbert]

Must be a bloody big deal to pay for all these transfers on top of the stadium plans 😅 

[StriderHiryu]

We still don’t know how much exactly the deal is worth but we might get an idea quite soon. If we sign a winger and only lose squad players we can probably assume the deal was worth a lot given we didn’t qualify for the Champions League. 

[Gav_LCFC14]

 

Websites updated, they must be paying us massive bucks.

[Fox in the North]

How much did King Power pay for sponsorship before? Seems the FBS deal should be useful as it’s clearly more than the rest of the pack (until Newcastle get their Saudi backing sorted of course)

[moore_94]

9 minutes ago, Fox in the North said:

How much did King Power pay for sponsorship before? Seems the FBS deal should be useful as it’s clearly more than the rest of the pack (until Newcastle get their Saudi backing sorted of course)

Pretty sure it was around the £4m area

[chapero82]

12 minutes ago, Fox in the North said:

How much did King Power pay for sponsorship before? Seems the FBS deal should be useful as it’s clearly more than the rest of the pack (until Newcastle get their Saudi backing sorted of course)

So much for not needing the champions league money  

[Nalis]

12 minutes ago, Fox in the North said:

How much did King Power pay for sponsorship before? Seems the FBS deal should be useful as it’s clearly more than the rest of the pack (until Newcastle get their Saudi backing sorted of course)

Liverpool getting less sponsorship than Spurs, bloody hell.

[VLC86]

The figure I heard on this deal was £30m. No idea how accurate that is or the frequency.

[KingsX]

Biggest of the "other 14" by a country mile at 18M/year, 50% more than Hammers, almost twice Everton.

 

Excuse me while I return to Susan Whelan's altar to worship anew.

 

Though I do wonder if any of that is contingent on being in Europe ...

[Izzy]

I can't imagine Rwanda get much of a ROI on the £10m they pay Arsenal for sleeve sponsorship

[KingsX]

1 hour ago, Izzy said:

I can't imagine Rwanda get much of a ROI on the £10m they pay Arsenal for sleeve sponsorship

 

I started to laugh and then took a minute to look up their GDP.  10 billion US$.  So well over a tenth of a percent of it goes to Kroenke and Co.

From a country where "almost 90 percent of the population lives on less than US$2 per day and half of its population lives on less than US$1 per day."