HoustonFox Posted 14 August 2016 Posted 14 August 2016 23 minutes ago, Wymeswold fox said: Saturday's game would be perfect for him, against pacey wingers and fast counter-attacking play. Totally agree, could have seen him coming on yesterday with his direct running and physical presence (that people often forget is a big part of what he "brings"). He's actually been pretty impactful when coming on as a sub this preseason and Marc hasn't been impressive so far. Hope we keep him.
W88DY Posted 14 August 2016 Posted 14 August 2016 3 minutes ago, dannythefox said: Everybody saying don't sell including me but the point people are missing is the lad wants to be starting every week. Id love him to stay but don't think it's going to happen. Every footballer wants to start every week and play every game but they have to earn their place in the squad and he`s not done that in my opinion. Good luck to him.
Old Fox Posted 14 August 2016 Posted 14 August 2016 4 minutes ago, W88DY said: Every footballer wants to start every week and play every game but they have to earn their place in the squad and he`s not done that in my opinion. Good luck to him. Be gutted when he goes....but I understand he just wants to play which in modern footballer terms is quite admirable imo
fuchsntf Posted 14 August 2016 Posted 14 August 2016 I want him to stay, he should stay... He gives us that turn of speed, he has saved us matches, he has won us matches... He might want 1st team football, but I am sure Ranieri could make a compromise, with Schlupp within the PL, and CL games, giving him some starters, because like it or not Ranieri will be needing to tinker, its the nature of being a PL title winner. Gray and Zap, will have also their chances, but neither will become yet, established 1st choice.We need to keep in mind , the importance of the squad, days of gone of a top 12-14. BBone of players doesnt mean 1st choice neither. Chilwell, Gray, Zapi, Armatey stars will rise, plus I see Shinji, Ulloa, and if he stays Schlupp, going that step further.
dylanlegend Posted 14 August 2016 Posted 14 August 2016 21 minutes ago, Kitchandro said: But he's not even as good as Ibe. And I don't rate Ibe. Yeh he is Ibe is sh*te
Bluearmyfox28 Posted 14 August 2016 Posted 14 August 2016 Could pave way for Slimani as we can alternate Musa on the wing now?
Foxes1 Posted 15 August 2016 Posted 15 August 2016 At least if he goes we will be in profit on our transfer dealings this window which I suspect this is what the owners want.
wardyfox86 Posted 15 August 2016 Posted 15 August 2016 4 minutes ago, Foxes1 said: At least if he goes we will be in profit on our transfer dealings this window which I suspect this is what the owners want. With the Prem money coming in I doubt they are worried about staying above the line in that department.
mozartfox Posted 15 August 2016 Posted 15 August 2016 29 minutes ago, Foxes1 said: At least if he goes we will be in profit on our transfer dealings this window which I suspect this is what the owners want. Why would they want this? I would have thought their primary aim is to have another successful year of sorts?
David Lowe Posted 15 August 2016 Posted 15 August 2016 14 minutes ago, mozartfox said: Why would they want this? I would have thought their primary aim is to have another successful year of sorts? Their primary aim is to make money. Obviously success will help them do this.
Mark 'expert' Lawrenson Posted 15 August 2016 Posted 15 August 2016 39 minutes ago, Foxes1 said: At least if he goes we will be in profit on our transfer dealings this window which I suspect this is what the owners want. I'd of disagreed with this completely before the last 3 or 4 weeks but we've not spent much at all with the money back in from Kante, but let's wait until the end of the transfer window and they'll be a clearer idea then. oh and they are still fantastic owners, what they've done for our club already is amazing!
WigstonWanderer Posted 15 August 2016 Posted 15 August 2016 Money will follow success. Selling to make a profit would be very shortsighted.
Countryfox Posted 15 August 2016 Posted 15 August 2016 29 minutes ago, David Lowe said: Their primary aim is to make money. Obviously success will help them do this. I think their primary aim is to build the club slowly as they have already stated and that is what they are doing... its fairly clear they are not short circuiting that because of our success last year ... the targets (players) they have gone for are still the ones they would have gone for whether we had finished 10th or top. A good policy and the right thing to do imo.
Viva Posted 15 August 2016 Posted 15 August 2016 1 hour ago, Foxes1 said: At least if he goes we will be in profit on our transfer dealings this window which I suspect this is what the owners want. Nice trolling. You got a few replies there.
Clever Fox Posted 15 August 2016 Posted 15 August 2016 Schlupp is a lot better than some on here give him credit for. All he needs is one to one Coaching to bring that talent to the fore. He was sadly missed on Saturday against Hull.
Guest CityFan 06 Posted 15 August 2016 Posted 15 August 2016 15 minutes ago, Clever Fox said: Schlupp is a lot better than some on here give him credit for. All he needs is one to one Coaching to bring that talent to the fore. He was sadly missed on Saturday against Hull. This 100%.
The Railway Man Posted 15 August 2016 Posted 15 August 2016 2 hours ago, Viva said: Nice trolling. You got a few replies there. A few weeks ago I would have agreed. However it does look like we intend to make a profit every summer on transfers, I don't really see how anyone can argue that anymore given we keep doing it.
Manwell Pablo Posted 15 August 2016 Posted 15 August 2016 On 8/14/2016 at 10:54, mozartfox said: He is under contract. The Club is bigger than him and we will need him. He should be told he must stay and knuckle down.. If he is replaced with Brady, then we have a serious recruitment problem. Are we really gonna need him? He's a car crash of a left back Fuchs and Chillwell both much more reliable, and we've got four wingers all ahead of him, not to mention a striker who can play his position if needed. So surplus to requirements it's untrue and 12 million is good value for someone who hasn't never held a place down here for any length of time in any position. One thing I will agree with you on is that Brady is not the answer should we get that extra cash in. On 8/14/2016 at 11:25, yorkie1999 said: Problem is, thats what we're going to have to tell his replacement. Not a very attracting way of having to recruit someone. Not necessarily, £12 extra million in the coffers, remembering we've spent next to nothing as well, we should be looking to land one or two big players who can actually compete for a place. Just seems like panic for panicing sake in here.
Viva Posted 15 August 2016 Posted 15 August 2016 9 minutes ago, The Railway Man said: A few weeks ago I would have agreed. However it does look like we intend to make a profit every summer on transfers, I don't really see how anyone can argue that anymore given we keep doing it. When was the last time we made a profit?
The Railway Man Posted 15 August 2016 Posted 15 August 2016 3 minutes ago, Viva said: When was the last time we made a profit? Last financial year.
Viva Posted 15 August 2016 Posted 15 August 2016 Just now, The Railway Man said: Last financial year. No we didn't. You do realise the comment was about transfer dealings, not company profit?
Claridge Posted 15 August 2016 Posted 15 August 2016 23 minutes ago, The Railway Man said: A few weeks ago I would have agreed. However it does look like we intend to make a profit every summer on transfers, I don't really see how anyone can argue that anymore given we keep doing it. Yea it's not as if they could of sold vardy for 20 million and saved 20 mill on wages. Do the maths
The Railway Man Posted 15 August 2016 Posted 15 August 2016 13 minutes ago, Viva said: When was the last time we made a profit? 9 minutes ago, Viva said: No we didn't. You do realise the comment was about transfer dealings, not company profit? Well obviously not given your original question (above) didn't say that. 8 minutes ago, Claridge said: Yea it's not as if they could of sold vardy for 20 million and saved 20 mill on wages. Do the maths They didn't need to when they were about to make 45 million selling Kante and Schulpp.
HankMarvin Posted 15 August 2016 Posted 15 August 2016 I don't think the 12 million is really significant though. the club is the richest it's ever been, the owners are billionaires, plus Cl money plus biggest ever prem money. plus Kante money. extra squad depth needed for extra games this doesn't make sense
ARCHER Posted 15 August 2016 Posted 15 August 2016 8 minutes ago, HankMarvin said: I don't think the 12 million is really significant though. the club is the richest it's ever been, the owners are billionaires, plus Cl money plus biggest ever prem money. plus Kante money. extra squad depth needed for extra games this doesn't make sense Only makes sense if we're going to bring in a worldy or if Jeff wants to go badly enough.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.