Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Tuna

Gylfi Sigurdsson

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, les-tah said:

Barnes hasnt played for us pre season. he clearly has shown hes not quite ready for us yet.

Haven't seen him play much at all, have to admit, but he's apparently highly-rated in both the press and a few on this forum..

As he signed a new four-year contract with the club recently - why not give him some form of opportunity to impress and take a 'risk' on him or James (with the latter having more playing time under his belt?).

 

Despite rating Sigurdsson as a good player in his position, I demand that he plays excellently at the inflated price reported, if we even have a very outside chance of getting him.

Hence, my point is really is that we shouldn't go in a bidding war over someone who is experienced but may not improve our squad over the supposedly highly-rated young talent within the club.

Posted
2 hours ago, Babylon said:

Would love to find a formation that got Mahrez, Sig, Nacho, Vardy and Slim on the pitch! (Almost impossible).

Sigurdsson Iheanacho Vardy Slimani Mahrez

 

                                Kante

 

              Fuchs Maguire Morgan Simpson

 

;)

Posted
Just now, HighPeakFox said:

Yes, trust the Daily Mail, that's my mantra.

Quotes in the article are from Koeman. Says deal is close.

Posted
25 minutes ago, Tuna said:

Going Everton, time to close thread.

As we were told around 4 bloody weeks ago! 

 

this is truly the most nonsensical thread and waste of time I can recall on FT (and there has been a lot of dross over the years!)

Posted
5 hours ago, mod hero said:

I've seen him play in a front 3 and also in CM for Iceland but he would be wasted playing in one of the wide positions in a 442

It's more for variety, change of pace during the game if we need it. Our attack grew incredibly stale last season. Teams began to play their lines deep and bottle up Mahrez with several defenders, which left us struggling to get shots on goal.

 

If a team gets comfortable defending against a player like Gylfi, he has the ability to be a threat elsewhere. He could move outside, or we could drop Nacho back to pair with him in a Vardy up top/one striker look, or half-a-dozen other things. For me, it is about evolving, getting one-dimensional players off the pitch, and planning to play a variety of ways to make it difficult to scheme for our attack in a way it simply wasn't last season.

 

For me, that looks like adding a credible AM threat, as we're discussing, Gylfi, Hazard, someone from the Spanish League, someone whonis a playmaker first, but who can play different roles in foreard position as well.

 

Then we need a CB who is an excellent defender, strong passer, and at least as comfortable as Maguire bringing the ball out, in that order. We'd instantly add 10% to our time of possession, which would obviously cut 10% from the other side. That would probably be worth an 10-12 points in the standings, we could still counterattack like madmen, but we'd add the ability to methodically move the ball up the field rather than sending a 50-50 ball into the opposing half. Shakey gets it, he knows we need that bad, and we're clearly looking. No more of this daring our backs to bring the ball out crap by simply playing in front of our MF. Far too easy for the other team.

Posted

So if this guy is going Everton and we have identified a need for a creative player in the middle and we're willing to spend big on this, who's our plan B. 

 

Or if we don't get him then just not bother and wait another year or two and see what happens.

 

It's odd that when we don't get our primary target we don't for an alternative and it costs us dearly.

 

This happened with Keane and we had massive defensive shortfall last season and Silva so Drinkwater had to play injured with Amarty in midfield.

 

Why don't the club learn on this? 

Posted
11 hours ago, Wymeswold fox said:

Haven't seen him play much at all, have to admit, but he's apparently highly-rated in both the press and a few on this forum..

As he signed a new four-year contract with the club recently - why not give him some form of opportunity to impress and take a 'risk' on him or James (with the latter having more playing time under his belt?).

 

Despite rating Sigurdsson as a good player in his position, I demand that he plays excellently at the inflated price reported, if we even have a very outside chance of getting him.

Hence, my point is really is that we shouldn't go in a bidding war over someone who is experienced but may not improve our squad over the supposedly highly-rated young talent within the club.

oh yeah hes very very highly rated but if he was ready and they thought he would play for us a few times this season im sure he would of seen pre season minutes!

Posted
8 minutes ago, LinekersApples said:

We never "wanted" GS.

 

We put a bid in that set the price for RM.

 

Rudkin and co are cleverer than you give them credit for :ph34r:

No shock here and seems very plauseable. Also explains a 40m bid and no attempt to follow it up.

 

That and we have fvcked it up for Everton lollol drop a 40m bomb then walk away lol do we have any known ties with Swansea?

Posted
Just now, Sublime_Coatsworth said:

It'd be fvckin hilarious if we stormed in at the 11th hour and snapped him up for £50m.

 

If only to piss off the entitled 'big club' Evington fans :D

I'd piss myself laughing.

Posted
43 minutes ago, daz*dsb said:

We should just offer £60m to rustle everyone's jimmies. 

Knowing full well Swansea will up the asking price up to £65m anyway. 

 

Soz Everton :wasyl:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...