les-tah Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 LOCK THE THREAD.. MOVE ON. SPEND the 40 million from a worldie from overseason ha ha
Callabinho Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 You won't get £40million out of him that's for sure....there's better and younger options out there!
simon789us Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 If we really want him get a bid accepted talk to the guy see if he's interested if not move on
TJB-fox Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 23 minutes ago, Babylon said: Does make me laugh how bids by certain teams for certain players are met with distain and others aren't. Twitter was full of the usual lets laugh at Leicester stuff when it was reported we'd bid £40m for Sigurdsson. But rumours of United going for Dier at £50m / £60m, who frankly I think is a massively limited footballer. Or Man City for Walker at £40m - £60m for a bloody right back, nobody bats an eyelid. Have to disagree personally, two excellent footballers. English= higher price, man city = higher price, young (Dier) = higher price!
les-tah Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 in b4 the lock... but i hope we bit 50 knowing he ent coming here just to fcuck over everton
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 Everton really are the spunky trunks of this transfer window.
Babylon Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 7 minutes ago, TJB-fox said: Have to disagree personally, two excellent footballers. English= higher price, man city = higher price, young (Dier) = higher price! So they should be laughed at even more then, just like City do a bit more now for spending £50m on limited footballers in Sterling and Stones.
Arriba Los Zorros Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 On 11/07/2017 at 22:11, DJ Barry Hammond said: Did someone really just suggest Lallana as a £50 million player!?! Adam Lallana! Lallana > Sigurdsson IMO. About £10m better
Steve Earle Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 1 he didn't want to come here 2 it's silly money @ £40m+ 3 Deeney for £20M? Now you're talking...
murphy Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 5 minutes ago, Steve Earle said: 1 he didn't want to come here 2 it's silly money @ £40m+ 3 Deeney for £20M? Now you're talking... Two out of three ain't bad.
STUHILL Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 2 minutes ago, Steve Earle said: 1 he didn't want to come here 2 it's silly money @ £40m+ 3 Deeney for £20M? Now you're talking... Where does Deeney fit into our starting 11 if Iheanacho deal goes through? On the bench I'm guessing. We need a genuine creative midfielder/No.10 Don't think Deeney will come unless he is a starter and we crave some creativity, so unless Ulloa/Slimani leave, or we don't sign Iheanacho, then I would spend that £20m elsewhere
weller54 Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 We'll be back in for Deeney.. And this time we'll get him... 30m!
st albans fox Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 Until this deal goes through, our nett spend this window so far is higher than Everton's (and we've only bought two players!!) can everyone stop spunking over their spending BTW, he doesn't want to come here so why we have got to P93 is astonishing
Fox 4 Life Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 How many attacking midfielders do Everton need! A striker should be the priority
dpjfox Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 Hes pulled out of USA Tour so obviously set to move, likely to Everton imo
foxes21 Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 Imo we don't even need a player like Gylfi, if we sign Iheanacho. What we need is another proven, quality winger to seriously challenge Mahrez/Albrighton.
Al-aLondon-Foxile Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 6 minutes ago, st albans fox said: Until this deal goes through, our nett spend this window so far is higher than Everton's (and we've only bought two players!!) can everyone stop spunking over their spending BTW, he doesn't want to come here so why we have got to P93 is astonishing Probably because people feel they need to make a comment.....
TAFKA Castroneves Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 2 minutes ago, foxes21 said: Imo we don't even need a player like Gylfi, if we sign Iheanacho. What we need is another proven, quality winger to seriously challenge Mahrez/Albrighton. Agree with this, seemed a lot of money for a player i wasn't convinced we would be able to accomodate on the pitch to his full potential. I love pre-season, Swansea lost to Barnet with Siggy in the team = he wants out = the manager probably needs the money to rebuild a LOT of that side. It's not looking good for Swansea no matter what they do
Gerard Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 1 hour ago, woznotwos said: When you consider Chelsea are close to getting Tiemoue Bakayoko, 22, for £40m on a five-year deal from Monaco it makes me think Gylfi is overpriced . Matic anyone He's massively overpriced at £40m. He's 28 in less than two months and his career to date has been surplus at the only big club he has played for and playing at a mediocre PL club. Yes he would have improved us but he's terrible value at that money. When you consider probable future world class players like Coman and Dembele going to Bayern and Dortmund for £40m combined it looks ridiculous. At that price Everton are welcome to him. I'd much rather invest in players like Iheanacho and try and pick up the next generation rather than an already declining asset in Sigurdsson who we already know is a good but not great player.
STUHILL Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 1 minute ago, foxes21 said: Imo we don't even need a player like Gylfi, if we sign Iheanacho. What we need is another proven, quality winger to seriously challenge Mahrez/Albrighton. If Iheanacho is set on playing behind Vardy, then you are probably right, although Sigurdsson's set pieces would have been a huge asset to have. Even with Iheanacho and his ability to run at people, we will still lack someone who can get on the ball in midfield with creativity and flair and create things out of nothing, similar to what Mahrez has been able to do out wide. Even if Mahrez does stay, we will still need someone similar to avoid relying so heavily on him. If he does go, we will need a new winger and a creative CM/no.10 in my opinion. Be interesting to see how Shakey wants to set us up next season, whether he will stick with 4-4-1-1 and where he sees Iheanacho fitting in. Also, how highly we rate Lawrence in the number 10 role and whether he can have an impact there from the bench. I'd assume we are aiming higher if we were genuinely in for Sigurdsson.
Guest Chocolate Teapot Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 1 hour ago, Leicester_Loyal said: You were the one I was hoping would reply haha We may have been used to try and push the price up. It'll end up being like 45m + 5m in add ons I reckon, which is insane! Yep that's my thoughts exactly. we definitely spoke to Swansea and the player.
MPH Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 19 minutes ago, st albans fox said: Until this deal goes through, our nett spend this window so far is higher than Everton's (and we've only bought two players!!) can everyone stop spunking over their spending BTW, he doesn't want to come here so why we have got to P93 is astonishing That's an odd thing to say about net spending... they have sold ONE but look at the quality of players they are bringing in...
Jimbo Posted 13 July 2017 Posted 13 July 2017 daft to think Bayern got James Rodriguez for around 5 million less than the figures being thrown around for Sigurdson.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.