Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, The whole world smiles said:

As Leicester fans we need Liverpool to win this or at least draw but..... 

 

Having been at anfield the other week this 45 minutes has been a thing of beauty to watch!

I've got about 250 riding on us finishing within 33 points of them so for me the odd loss and a tight title race suits.

Posted

Maybe it is Man Utd nullyfying them well but why couldn't we get this luke warm version of Liverpool with no kind of tempo to them? This is like Liverpool light, a watered down version of the real thing.

Posted

Thought the new rules were accidental or not a handball would be called, it was handball so right decision. Also even though he was kicked he went over far to theatrically. Nice actually to think that the officials are aware of this falling over and not fooled by Klopp's fake outrage last time out

  • Like 2
Guest Manini
Posted (edited)

Souness saying that’s a foul is comedy gold. If that’s a foul he’d have been sent off within 5 minutes of every game he played! 
 

**** that, he’d have been banged up for assault! 

Edited by Manini
Posted

Would love some consistency on the contact that's allowed in football these days. 

Mane tap was deemed a foul, yet the Vertonghen tackle is deemed a fair challenge. 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, DerbyshireFox said:

Doesn’t matter anymore though with the new law. If it hits the hand accidentally or not, it’s disallowed 

Stupid though isn’t it. If we go with that then the United goal shouldn’t stand for the foul. Even though contact is minimal there’s still contact.

 

Not that I care to much, because I don’t care who wins, but VAR I don’t like it.

Posted
2 minutes ago, filbertway said:

Sorry that is never a foul by Lindelof. You've been absolutely brainwashed by diving if you genuinely think that contact was unfair.

Where's the dive?

 

Lindelof significantly kicks Origi's shin. Origi goes down. If someone does that on Vardy, we're baying for a free-kick.

Guest Markyblue
Posted

United win better for us, keeps ogs safe for another 10 games and upsets that cretin kloop.

Posted
Just now, Matt said:

Klopp suits Liverpool, always the victim.

 

Those new teeth were expensive.  He shouldn't grind them so much

  • Haha 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, SouthStandUpperTier said:

I'm all for VAR, but I have to admit the Premier League have made a right fudge of its implementation.

Shock! No consistency whatsoever and has just made the officials lazy. Atkinson should be seeing that as a foul without the aid of VAR

Guest Markyblue
Posted
Just now, KingsX said:

 

Those new teeth were expensive.  He shouldn't grind them so much

At least we know where shergars teeth went.

Posted (edited)

Btw, the issue with some of you is appreciating the difference with not overturning a call

 

thats what surprised me the most yesterday .... they overturned moss’s onfield  call 

 

EDIT: that’s a VAR thread post btw !

Edited by st albans fox
Posted
11 minutes ago, Fox92 said:

Stupid though isn’t it. If we go with that then the United goal shouldn’t stand for the foul. Even though contact is minimal there’s still contact.

 

Not that I care to much, because I don’t care who wins, but VAR I don’t like it.

Not really because the law isn't "contact = foul". I can see why a referee would look at that challenge and decide there wasn't really enough force to warrant giving a free kick, whereas under the new laws the Mane incident is basically the exact definition of handball.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...