Nod.E Posted 7 September 2019 Posted 7 September 2019 You just knew Mount would be the first sub. Maddison will be p*ssed.
Toddybad Posted 7 September 2019 Posted 7 September 2019 Could've won money on Mount getting on before Maddison, despite being half the player
UniFox21 Posted 7 September 2019 Posted 7 September 2019 1 minute ago, Sly said: Yes. You’d feel hard done by if it was against you. I don’t get Rashford either. If he wasn’t playing for Man U. I doubt he’d get in the squad. Its soft, basically identical to Kane's last 2 dives He's talented, but isnt showing it lately
Tuna Posted 7 September 2019 Posted 7 September 2019 You have to laugh. 4 games for Chelsea over the player whose made the most goal scoring chances in the premier league in the last 18 months (I can't be arsed to look up the correct stat but you know the one I mean).
orangecity23 Posted 7 September 2019 Posted 7 September 2019 Disgusting. He's going to leave Maddison on the bench for both games isn't he? While 4 prem appearances is all it takes for Mount to get a full cap.
nnfox Posted 7 September 2019 Posted 7 September 2019 Maddison will come on for Barkley. Sancho on for Rashford.
Eskay Posted 7 September 2019 Posted 7 September 2019 Typical top 6 bias. Chilwel and Madders will probably play 90 mins on Tuesday whilst the top 6 gang get 7 days rest for the next league games.
KingsX Posted 7 September 2019 Posted 7 September 2019 3 minutes ago, Sly said: I still have no idea what Barkley offers. He's on to make Bulgaria look decent. That having proved impossible, Southgate needs to sub him off.
oxtonfox Posted 7 September 2019 Posted 7 September 2019 Southgate becoming like previous national managers with preference for players from the so called big six.
UniFox21 Posted 7 September 2019 Posted 7 September 2019 Sterling? Rashford has done **** all? STG if the entire united team and other top 6 players get rests on tuesday for the other players
Sly Posted 7 September 2019 Posted 7 September 2019 I rate Mount. I’d like to see a 3 man midfield with Maddison, Henderson and Mount. Surely we’d be better: Pickford Trent AA Stones Maguire Chilwell Henderson Sancho Mount Maddison Sterling Kane
rachhere Posted 7 September 2019 Posted 7 September 2019 It's not just us being biased as well - quite a few supporters of other clubs ranting on Twitter that Madders hasn't been given chance yet.
oxtonfox Posted 7 September 2019 Posted 7 September 2019 another pen - thought Kane did an air shot then 🤭
LCFC FOX Posted 7 September 2019 Posted 7 September 2019 Southgate is overrated. Any manager can beat these kind of sides. When he’s played anyone half decent in a game that matters we play shite.
SouthStandUpperTier Posted 7 September 2019 Posted 7 September 2019 Kane is going to become England's all time leading scorer and 75% of them will be penalties.
Suzie the Fox Posted 7 September 2019 Posted 7 September 2019 Lol.. thanks Harry Kane. You just screwed my bet up if you score ... grrrrrrrr ****ing Spurs
HereBeFoxes Posted 7 September 2019 Posted 7 September 2019 Whatever else one might say Kane’s penalties are pretty much unstoppable.
UniFox21 Posted 7 September 2019 Posted 7 September 2019 Kane will be hailed as a hat-trick hero, but he's scored 2 penalties and a tap in
ALC Fox Posted 7 September 2019 Posted 7 September 2019 So Maddison tears up the Championship a full year before Mount does and created more goalscoring opportunities than any other PL player last leason, yet Mount jumps ahead of the queue. I might have my blue-tinted specs on re Maddison, and I've no doubt that Mount is the real deal as he's been hyped ever since he joined Derby on loan, but what is it about him exactly that means he's preferred ahead of Maddison? Can he play in more positions? Is it because he's more of a goal threat in terms of scoring them himself rather than assisting others? Or is it because he plays for Chelsea?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.