Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
urban.spaceman

James Maddison

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

It’s a bit of a poor show from yanited to leak this to a journo on whatever level it’s intended. Their player is having a tough time from all perspectives and considering yesterday’s mental health messages from the game, it stacks up v poorly for me. 

 

I think it's all rubbish myself and should be taken with a pinch of salt like the Xhaka & £40m for Ndidi. 

 

It's all a bit convenient to reduce the cash fee and get rid of a bit of your rubbish at the same time. It would be like us offering Villa a deal for Grealish and getting rid of Slimani, Silva, James and Amartey and £20m. 

Posted
Just now, Gerard said:

 

I think it's all rubbish myself and should be taken with a pinch of salt like the Xhaka & £40m for Ndidi. 

 

It's all a bit convenient to reduce the cash fee and get rid of a bit of your rubbish at the same time. It would be like us offering Villa a deal for Grealish and getting rid of Slimani, Silva, James and Amartey and £20m. 

It is rubbish - yes. strange that we have a current thread on it and red cafe don’t !  Pretty well sums it up !

 

reputable journos don’t just make stuff up - they are fed a story from someone, be it an agent or a club or ’ITK source’. the journo would usually approach the club for comment before issuing the story. In this case, no one at yanited has dissed the story prior to its issue or immediately afterwards ....

Posted
1 hour ago, hackneyfox said:

Well I agree with all that apart from the last bit. If we’ve sold them Maguire for £80m then by what logic would we only want £80m for a better player who is more important to the way we play than Maguire was.

Glad you’re not doing Rudkins job.

You know what I mean, clearly. I didn't want to put a price tag on him that's all.

 

And yeah I'm glad I don't do Rudkin's job either, have you seen the amount of stick he gets on here when something goes wrong.

Posted
23 minutes ago, Gerard said:

 

I think it's all rubbish myself and should be taken with a pinch of salt like the Xhaka & £40m for Ndidi. 

 

It's all a bit convenient to reduce the cash fee and get rid of a bit of your rubbish at the same time. It would be like us offering Villa a deal for Grealish and getting rid of Slimani, Silva, James and Amartey and £20m. 

 

They make perfect sense as 'click-bait twofers'.

 

Let's see how many more of these 'hugely important player swapped for cash plus massively underperforming player their own fans are pissed off with' deals are touted. 

Posted

But the Sunday Mirror have reported United are ready to test the Foxes’ resolve with an offer including Lingard and £45m.

It is claimed United value Lingard at £40m, estimating the potential deal to be worth £85m.

However, several United fans clearly don’t agree with the valuation of Lingered.

 

One fan joked: “Might as well just offer them £45million and a packet of starburst.”

Another quipped: “You’re basically paying £45million for Maddison.”

A third tweeted: “Leicester will decline and renegotiate the offer to just £45million.”

A fourth said: “I reckon Leicester will just accept the £45million.”

Another wrote: “Leicester have asked if they can just have the £45m, thanks.”

Posted

We’d be really stupid not to keep him for at least one more season and play him in the CL.

 

Sell him in a year and a half for £120 million.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Swan Lesta said:

We’d be really stupid not to keep him for at least one more season and play him in the CL.

 

Sell him in a year and a half for £120 million.

Would he want to go to United in the Championship :P

Posted

If there's any truth to the story (I seriously doubt that there is) then it's purely as a way of letting Maddison know they're interested in the hopes he'll kick off in the Summer window.  They'll know there's no chance any of our starting XI get moved on this month.

Posted

Man U under the stewardship of Woodward really are an embarassment . If the owners weren’t so detached from the club surely they’d recognise that he’s an idiot and not fit for purpose 

Posted
2 hours ago, hackneyfox said:

You’re the older and more realistic brother of Fox82?

Hmmm how many fox 80s is they....  

 

 

Right announce your selfs 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Posted

We should have put something in the deal for Maguire as Man U have to pay 100mil plus the transfer fee for any future transfers from us like Liverpool did with barca for coutinho 

Posted
2 hours ago, Carl the Llama said:

If there's any truth to the story (I seriously doubt that there is) then it's purely as a way of letting Maddison know they're interested in the hopes he'll kick off in the Summer window.  They'll know there's no chance any of our starting XI get moved on this month.

Why wouldn’t they just speak with his agent ?

Posted

The quality level of the English press is deplorable !!

They go on Twitter & find some comment that some mindless twits have endorsed & then turn it into a story.

Pathetic !!

Posted

In what world do Man U value Maddison at 45 million? He won’t be going anywhere for less that 100 million. Let’s make it 130 if they want him in Jan.

 

Whats happened to Man U seriously? Their transfer policy these days is embarrassing.

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Suffolk exile said:

Do we really think City players would stil be tempted do go there seeing what has happened to Maguire? 

I think most footballers, if they are the confident type with a bit of ego thrown in, believe they are the player that will make the difference and return a club like United back to the top. A huge raise in salary also helps. So yes, unfortunately they will always be tempted.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...