RowlattsFox Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 We'd be screaming for a penalty there so i can see why that one was given.
Babylon Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 4 minutes ago, Jaspa said: Suppose they consider the chest down as a new phase of play then Could understand that if it were a few seconds. He barely got the chance to even get it under control.
Vacamion Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 Dean Smith will gain my full respect if he comes out post match and alleges that Jon Moss is a cheat who has obviously taken a bung I mean, Villa have never ever benefited from a dreadful bit of refereeing, have they?
st albans fox Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 1 minute ago, Bats8711 said: I'm genuinely asking - what does the rule book say about that situation? Like - yes obviously we was offside and then won the ball back, but at what point does the "phase" change? Does Mings need to fully "control", or just touch it? 1st game of the 15/16 season v Sunderland albrighton’s goal - the fourth offside when the cross comes in but once the defender attempts to control the ball the phase changes and the attacker is no longer considered offside. The Sunderland player got a toe to it and it was considered an attempt to control the ball rather than a deflection. Had it just deflected off him then Marc would have been offside ..... I think you’ll find that the excuse from PGMOL will be that mings attempts to control the ball and subsequently rodri is no longer offside
StanSP Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 The only think I can think of is that they thought Mings slipped and Rodri took the ball from it. But even then that's really no excuse for it. They've had an absolute howler with it. It's quite blatantly obvious that Rodri has tackled Mings and was about 10-15 yards (?) offside when the header is made. Ridiculous decision really. No doubt PGMOL will make a statement after the game saying it was wrong and apologies to Villa. When in reality, it's totally changed the outcome of this game. 1
Sunbury Fox Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 I think it was probably a pen but the offside goal being given is inexplicable. Man City's next 3 games are West Brom, Sheff U and Burnley so we need to keep winning to have a chance of staying in touch. 1
UniFox21 Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 2 minutes ago, Fox seen in Norwich said: Harsh pen but his arms not by his side so no argument really.. but harsh none the less His hand is by his head
Corky Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 You can tell the incompetence of the officials when Peter Walton disagrees with them. Dean Smith becomes the 522nd person to be sent off for abusing Jon Moss. 1
walkerleeds Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 4 minutes ago, worthosoriginals said: Clueless post. Get yer brain in gear, if your a leic fan, look who villa are playing, then look at the table. Mate, we've played 19 (nineteen) games out of a 38 game season. I think you need to get your brain into gear if you're getting worked up about other teams results this early. 1
worthosoriginals Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 3 minutes ago, Unabomber said: Wtf we don’t miss an opportunity to abuse Moss here come on man Thank you moss bros.
StanSP Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 Premier League say that Mings plays it deliberate, it means Rodri isn't offside any more. What absolute bollocks rule is that
Popular Post Ric Flair Posted 20 January 2021 Popular Post Posted 20 January 2021 If VAR was as all encompassing bent as some think it is in regard to ensuring we aren't anywhere near the title race then why did they overturn that penalty yesterday, not judge Vardy to have clipped Rudiger for Maddison's goal and rule out Werner's? One minute VAR is purely wanting Liverpool to win the league (last season) now it's Spurs early on, then Man Utd and now Man City? Come on, stop pulling pissers. It's just shit full stop. 4 4
turtmcfly Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 3 minutes ago, peach0000 said: I think he did. I don’t agree with the rule and think it’s something that needs looked at but the rules are the rules Not sure he cares whether the decision is correct. As long as he can pretend the game's run by a Knights Templar splinter group he's happy 3
Unabomber Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 Ah I knew it was too good to be true with Peter Walton
adejo92 Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 Love how the FA have had a word with Peter Walton and made him lie to cover their nonsense. You could tell he felt uncomfortable lying about the rules. "Clearly see he didn't affect play" ... that's not what you said less than 10 minutes ago.
Koke Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 Payback for the farcical "goal" they were awarded against Sheffield United last season, that essentially kept them up. 1
Arkie Bennett Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 How are BT going to cram an hour's worth of talking about Man U into the available 15 minutes before kick off? 2
filbertway Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 So you can just stand offside now and tackle a defender as soon as they go to play the ball 1
st albans fox Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 9 minutes ago, Leicesterpool said: It's certain they want to keep us out of the title race. oh dear ...... 3 minutes ago, StanSP said: Premier League say that Mings plays it deliberate, it means Rodri isn't offside any more. What absolute bollocks rule is that bollocks rule Stan but you didn’t complain when our fourth goal went in v sland ..... 3 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: If VAR was as all encompassing bent as some think it is in regard to ensuring we aren't anywhere near the title race then why did they overturn that penalty yesterday, not judge Vardy to have clipped Rudiger for Maddison's goal and rule out Werner's? One minute VAR is purely wanting Liverpool to win the league (last season) now it's Spurs early on, then Man Utd and now Man City? Come on, stop pulling pissers. It's just shit full stop. Exactly
oxford fox Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 One corrupt incident and one to go no doubt in the Man U game they don’t want us to get near it do they
Bats8711 Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 Just now, filbertway said: So you can just stand offside now and tackle a defender as soon as they go to play the ball 2
Dan Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 I don't get how that goal can possibly count. Mings has only started the new phase of play because of the initial player from the forward who was in an offside position. Therefore the offside player has influenced the play. If that goal counts by the letter of the law then the law is simply wrong.
StanSP Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 1 minute ago, adejo92 said: Love how the FA have had a word with Peter Walton and made him lie to cover their nonsense. You could tell he felt uncomfortable lying about the rules. "Clearly see he didn't affect play" ... that's not what you said less than 10 minutes ago. It is the rule - I remember something similar happening between Liverpool & Spurs a few seasons ago. It's a shit rule mind. Rodri is offside. Clearly. He's influenced Mings in to playing the ball and making a mistake because of his position.
Guest foxestalkisfullofidiots Posted 20 January 2021 Posted 20 January 2021 Rio is right, that many changes not even the players on the pitch are sure of the rules
Recommended Posts