Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
happy85

David Brooks

By happy85, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

MGLCFC

MGLCFC

Posted
Posted

It could well go down to deadline day. Yes, Bournemouth have sold many of their big guns and don't need extra cash from the sale of Brooks, but if he wants to leave to play in the Premier League, then they have a decision to make. Keep an unhappy player or ask a realistic price.

MPH

MPH

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Brenfox said:

If he is unhappy & they don't want to lose him then why not a season long loan? Its not unheard of when a club gets relegated.

 

 

if we did that we’d want the option to buy..

TJB-fox

TJB-fox

Posted
Posted

50 million Jesus Christ. There’s inflated prices. Then there’s harry maguire inspired inflated prices. Then there’s that. 

The David brooks fan club on here will still be itching for us to pay it all upfront cash. 

Nicolo Barella

Nicolo Barella

Posted
Posted
On 12/09/2020 at 19:15, majaco said:

Bournemouth aren't short of fund right now.  With the sales of Ake , Wilson and Ramsdale , they have plenty of funds.  

Mind boggling that they've recouped about 70-80 million pounds from those three players, after getting relegated.

Finnegan

Finnegan

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Nicolo Barella said:

Mind boggling that they've recouped about 70-80 million pounds from those three players, after getting relegated.

 

Plus parachute payments 

majaco

majaco

Posted
Posted

Is Brooks now more of an asset than Maddison was when we bought him.  To me, there's not much in it.  Maybe premier league experience is in Brooks favour.  Both are excellent players.  They both offer class and creativity.  There has been inflation in transfer fees.  To me , that puts Brooks value at around 25 million.

Finnegan

Finnegan

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, majaco said:

Is Brooks now more of an asset than Maddison was when we bought him.  To me, there's not much in it.  Maybe premier league experience is in Brooks favour.  Both are excellent players.  They both offer class and creativity.  There has been inflation in transfer fees.  To me , that puts Brooks value at around 25 million.

 

I'd consider it pretty balanced to pay the same for Perez and Brooks. Perez had a bit more experience, Brooks has more promise really. He's probably already better than Perez. 30m is a fairly middle of the road fee for a young British attacker. 

 

50m is daft but Bournemouth know that, they're likely just posturing, trying to test how much United want him. 

 

That asking price will come down closer to the end of the window if there's still genuine interest from Premier League clubs. 

 

He seems like a decent enough professional to not throw his toys out over giving them a season in the Championship mind. 

Lesta Legend

Lesta Legend

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

 

I'd consider it pretty balanced to pay the same for Perez and Brooks. Perez had a bit more experience, Brooks has more promise really. He's probably already better than Perez. 30m is a fairly middle of the road fee for a young British attacker. 

 

50m is daft but Bournemouth know that, they're likely just posturing, trying to test how much United want him. 

 

That asking price will come down closer to the end of the window if there's still genuine interest from Premier League clubs. 

 

He seems like a decent enough professional to not throw his toys out over giving them a season in the Championship mind. 

Agree with this, their forum has a Balance of pay up or shut up (like we do) but a few believe the price they'd accept could be closer to £40 million. So £30 million with add-ons, if this isn't up £30 m up front the club may go for this. But he isn't a £50 million player and there is no way they'll get that from anyone. 

mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
Posted

They are looking at Leicester paying for their new ground. Move on - much much much much better value in Ligue 1.

  • Like 1
Finnegan

Finnegan

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Lesta Legend said:

Agree with this, their forum has a Balance of pay up or shut up (like we do) but a few believe the price they'd accept could be closer to £40 million. So £30 million with add-ons, if this isn't up £30 m up front the club may go for this. But he isn't a £50 million player and there is no way they'll get that from anyone. 

 

Yeah I mean we've said this before loads of times on here, a player is worth what he's worth to BOTH clubs. Bournemouth saying 50 is their way of saying "we don't really want to sell." That's their prerogative and totally fair. 

 

If we were willing to pay 50 for a winger, we'd have done it by now. We're obviously looking around to try and pick someone up for 20/30 odd. It's why we likely wanted Trincao on loan, so we could deal with the money at a later date. 

 

Looking at our transfer business so far this season it looks to me like we've probably ear marked about 60m (Chilwell + some prize money) that we're willing to spend on players. 

 

I'd say our list of priorities looks like it's:

 

1. Replace Chilwell 

2. Sign a CB

3. Sign a winger. 

 

Every time we check one of those off, we know how much we've got for the next. That's why it's taking us so long to settle on targets and why there seems to be two or three strong rumours (Tagliafico, Tarkowski, etc) at any given time because we're bartering around trying to get players in as cheap as possible. 

 

I'd be surprised if we don't tick all of those positions off before the end of the window but they're all gonna need to be in the 20/25 range. That'd be my educated guesswork off what we've seen so far. 

Edited by Finnegan
  • Like 3
CosbehFox

CosbehFox

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, Nicolo Barella said:

Tbf the vast majority of that is probably going to offset their huge losses

From what my Bournemouth work colleagues says the bankrolling Russian is claiming back some of the debt he’s ran up against the club 

  • Like 1
  • Popular Post
Deeg67

Deeg67

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

I don't know why we're bothering to look at domestic players at all, TBH.  We aren't the sort of club that can pay a 50% markup for players just because they're British or play domestically, not because they're actually better - leave that market for Chelsea and the Manchesters.

  • Like 6
SecretPro

SecretPro

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Deeg67 said:

I don't know why we're bothering to look at domestic players at all, TBH.  We aren't the sort of club that can pay a 50% markup for players just because they're British or play domestically, not because they're actually better - leave that market for Chelsea and the Manchesters.

100% this. Hugely expensive and not even good value. Waste of time and definitely a waste of money. Imagine paying £50m for Brooks when you compare it to what we spent of Ricardo, Youri and Maddison (I know he's British but prices since then have become even more ridiculous). 

  • Like 1
UniFox21

UniFox21

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, SecretPro said:

100% this. Hugely expensive and not even good value. Waste of time and definitely a waste of money. Imagine paying £50m for Brooks when you compare it to what we spent of Ricardo, Youri and Maddison (I know he's British but prices since then have become even more ridiculous). 

A great example is Watkins going for £33 million, by no means is he worth that and Werner was brought for just over £14mill more. 

moore_94

moore_94

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Out Foxed said:

berahino is being touted for 20 mill no? we should be looking at him with that price

Few years late for that price :ph34r:

Edited by moore_94
  • Haha 2
MrLuke

MrLuke

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Out Foxed said:

berahino is being touted for 20 mill no? we should be looking at him with that price

Really hope you mean Benrahma 😳

foxfan92

foxfan92

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, JamesfromlondonLCFC said:

nah bro the last 5 years been a dream is actually 2015

In that case in spite of odds at 5000 to 1, there is a certain bet I'd like to put some money on for me 

  • Haha 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...