Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Main details as things stand are 

️ Two West Ham bids rejected, latter reached £30m with add ons 

️ Player ready to leave Turf Moor to further international ambitions 

️ Leicester & Chelsea monitoring situation but neither club has been in thus far

 

lancs live

Posted
1 minute ago, happy85 said:

Main details as things stand are 

️ Two West Ham bids rejected, latter reached £30m with add ons 

️ Player ready to leave Turf Moor to further international ambitions 

️ Leicester & Chelsea monitoring situation but neither club has been in thus far

 

lancs live

We could just sit back and let West Ham find out the price before swooping in and snatching him.

Posted
4 hours ago, UniFox21 said:

Stop posting these on every damn thread 

👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀

Posted
5 minutes ago, Adster said:

👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀

Moron lol 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thing is Burnley have every right to set the asking price, just as we do when other clubs start sniffing around our players.

buying clubs of course have every right to laugh at their valuation and walk away, or pay the price if they are desperate to land their target. Much of what is put out to the media is simply a smokescreen to hide the serious negotiations and a way for all parties to say we did our best to strike the right deal. That and of course most of what is out there is simply bllx and click bait.

 

Posted

If we really want Tarks as well as Fofana then we should use Benko as part of the deal as he clearly isnt going to be in Rodgers plans but he could be a decent player for Burnley. £25m plus Benko wouldn't be a bad deal. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, jayfox26 said:

If we really want Tarks as well as Fofana then we should use Benko as part of the deal as he clearly isnt going to be in Rodgers plans but he could be a decent player for Burnley. £25m plus Benko wouldn't be a bad deal. 

How do you work that out?

Posted
41 minutes ago, South Shire Fox said:

How do you work that out?

If we had Soyuncu, Evans, Fofana and Tarkowski, Benko isnt going to play much is he? 

Posted
1 hour ago, jayfox26 said:

If we had Soyuncu, Evans, Fofana and Tarkowski, Benko isnt going to play much is he? 

His persistent injuries would tend to suggest that he's not much good to anyone so why would Burnley cut a deal? Nobody with any sense would take him at the moment which is very sad for the lad because there's enough evidence to suggest there's a good player in there somewhere. 

Posted
7 hours ago, volpeazzurro said:

His persistent injuries would tend to suggest that he's not much good to anyone so why would Burnley cut a deal? Nobody with any sense would take him at the moment which is very sad for the lad because there's enough evidence to suggest there's a good player in there somewhere. 

Yeh that is true. Is a shame, like you say he looks like he could have been a really good player. I think the long term plan when we signed him was him and Cags as our cb pairing which could have been really good had it not been for his injuries. 

  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, urban fox said:

Thing is Burnley have every right to set the asking price, just as we do when other clubs start sniffing around our players.

buying clubs of course have every right to laugh at their valuation and walk away, or pay the price if they are desperate to land their target. Much of what is put out to the media is simply a smokescreen to hide the serious negotiations and a way for all parties to say we did our best to strike the right deal. That and of course most of what is out there is simply bllx and click bait.

 

This is true to a degree when the "buying" club is a top 4 club with lots of money. To them it really (to a certain extent) doesn't matter if he's £35m or £50m if he is their target. The problem Burnley have is that we are the buying club and we cannot afford to "over pay" for a player no matter what really. We will turn our attention elsewhere and they could have a player now who really doesn't want to play for them and is pissed off that they didn't give him the chance to further his career......

 

That is unless Chelsea feel like having a punt! lol

Posted

Please W Ham get this over one the line and then bid for Vestagaard.

Posted
2 minutes ago, casablancas said:

Tbf I thought he looked pretty good when he came on. 

The fact he was not selected to start speaks volumes.

Posted
Just now, mozartfox said:

The fact he was not selected to start speaks volumes.

Nah I agree. But having watched the full 90 mins out of all sotons cb’s he looked the best. I mean it don’t say much lol  but it stands. I’d rather have Tawks 

Posted

There are better bloody options than this aging lump. Do we still have an actual scouting system or did Brendan sack then too for screwing up the 2nd half of last season?

  • Haha 3
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...