Sly Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 Just now, RonnieTodger said: Since we appointed BR, ours and Wolves styles make for honking games. I think Wolves play like this most weeks. They’re bot a great watch.
Jon the Hat Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 2 minutes ago, Angus Scott said: Just ask yourselves, would Nacho, Perez or Hamza be picked for any other team in the top ten of the Premier League? So why are they playing for us I think it’s because Vardy and Ndidi who would are injured. 3
Mark 'expert' Lawrenson Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 2 minutes ago, Angus Scott said: Just ask yourselves, would Nacho, Perez or Hamza be picked for any other team in the top ten of the Premier League? So why are they playing for us Because Vardy and Wilf are injured 1 1
Beechey Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 3 minutes ago, Angus Scott said: Just ask yourselves, would Nacho, Perez or Hamza be picked for any other team in the top ten of the Premier League? So why are they playing for us Because we have injuries 3
surrifox Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 My thoughts at half time are that it would be really disappointing if our proud unbeaten away run should be ended by such an unenterprising and lack lustre opposition 1
Carl the Llama Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 It's going to be delicious when Perez ghosts in at the back post to score the winner. 1
kingfox Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 Another cheap ball given away by Perez, our right side has been crap.
Alan Frost Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 29 minutes ago, Nod.E said: Why is Perez copping so much stick? He's getting stuck in, which is more than you can say of most of his appearances for us. Thats half the trouble.He's getting stuck in for Wolves.
murphy Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 1 minute ago, Carl the Llama said: It's going to be delicious when Perez ghosts in at the back post to score the winner. I'll take that bet!
Bourbon Fox Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 1 minute ago, matty98 said: Why does Perez get chance after chance when he's playing badly but Under gets 30 minute and if he doesn't set the world alight doesn't play for the next 3 games. Very odd. There's definitely something we're missing, Rodgers clearly isn't impressed with Under and I can't see why on the face of it 1
Unabomber Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 4 minutes ago, NaijaFox said: You mean he fouled a lot No I meant won the ball back. Don’t worry I did slag him off too no need to panic
Fox85 Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 3 mins gone and Perez has given the ball away 4 times already 2
Mark 'expert' Lawrenson Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 Come on City. One goal wins this.
Dahnsouff Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 Just now, kingfox said: Another cheap ball given away by Perez, our right side has been crap. He was passing to Riccy who stopped his run for some reason, do pay attention old chap
hebangsthedrums Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 6 minutes ago, jammie82uk said: VAR don’t give yellows, had the ref gave the penalty, then a yellow card could be given for the dive by the ref Ah didnt know that. Bit stupid really as dives are something easy (in theory) to pick up with the benefit of replays - would be an added disincentive too 2
Blanchflower78 Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 Spark required, looks like a sunday knockabout down the park.
hebangsthedrums Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 3 minutes ago, matty98 said: Why does Perez get chance after chance when he's playing badly but Under gets 30 minute and if he doesn't set the world alight doesn't play for the next 3 games. Very odd. One of them we 'invested' £30m in, so need to try and play him into form
Stephen Hughes Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 3 minutes ago, Carl the Llama said: It's going to be delicious when Perez ghosts in at the back post to score the winner. He’s ghosted everywhere else so far so could be right 1
Tielemans63 Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 Just now, Bourbon Fox said: There's definitely something we're missing, Rodgers clearly isn't impressed with Under and I can't see why on the face of it To be fair, I'm a massive fan of Brendan but I do think there's an element of trying to justify the £30m outlay. 1 1
Bazly Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 Second half summary. Wolves are improving and Perez is helping.
Carl the Llama Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 1 minute ago, weller54 said: Has Perez completed ONE pass in this game? His through ball led to Nacho's half-chance.
Babylon Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 3 minutes ago, Carl the Llama said: It's going to be delicious when Perez ghosts in at the back post to score the winner. Hope he does, doesn’t mean he’s not been gubbins so far.
youngvolki Posted 7 February 2021 Posted 7 February 2021 7 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said: Albrighton I would agree, but cannot see an argument for starting Under, not enough evidence indicating that we shoulda try Under over Perez to be honest the evidence is Perez offering nothing of worth to the offense, Under can't possibly add less than that . Can't judge him without finally being given a proper run of games, but from his cameos I've definetely seen more creativity and goal threat from him, albeit also more selfnishness but that is probably due to him getting little game time and wanting to show himself.
Recommended Posts